Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:09 AM
 
4,278 posts, read 5,182,764 times
Reputation: 2375

Advertisements

Many people feel Liberals force change through the courts rather than the ballot box. There is a ring of truth to this and a sad state of affairs.

 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:39 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,917,798 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Ah, so it would make sense to simply legalize gay marriage at a federal level, giving equal rights, and be done with it. Or are you one of those people that think we can only deal with one issue at a time?
Well, of course, I am "one of those people".....our government has proven itself inept on every level of dealing with any amount of issues in any amount of time.

And, maybe, yes it should just be changed so homosexuals **** and get over it. But we know it isn't that easy because the Christian nutjobs are just as absurd when it comes to fighting the issue. BUT that doesn't mean you buck what has been a social norm in society for 200+ years for an extreme voting minority. It's simply something that can be brought to the table once the SERIOUS injustices in this country are dealt with.

Like another poster said...

Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
Many people feel Liberals force change through the courts rather than the ballot box. There is a ring of truth to this and a sad state of affairs.
Homosexuals are exhibit A when it comes to this...
 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:52 AM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,438,277 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Another state making a travesty out of the institution of marriage.

Thankfully, the majority of U.S. states exercise common sense and decency by not kowtowing to the fringe gay "marriage" movement.

They would impress the heck out of Harrier by removing state sanction for marriage - placing it into private hands where it belongs.

Government needs to get out of the marriage business.
What's sad it's not even the government it's the loony left wing judges. In this case one female judge in on county.
 
Old 10-19-2013, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,229,657 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
What's sad it's not even the government it's the loony left wing judges. In this case one female judge in on county.
Yeah, that and the state and federal constitution.
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:19 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,453,584 times
Reputation: 5047
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
Many people feel Liberals force change through the courts rather than the ballot box. There is a ring of truth to this and a sad state of affairs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
Homosexuals are exhibit A when it comes to this...
Absolutely. Rarely has any position been so eloquently and succinctly stated.

..... except .....

Sometimes social change - even when totally justified by any moral, ethical, "Christian" standard - just will not happen via the ballot box due to people's ignorant fears and prejudices.

As an example, I give you Brown v. the Board of Education, the unanimous Supreme Court decision stating that separate but equal schools for blacks and whites were inherently unequal.

Would the desegregation of public schools have happened if left to the ballot box? Probably, with time, and in most states ... but perhaps not all, even today. It was a clear injustice whose remedy was blocked long before it came to the ballot box because of the aforementioned fears and prejudices.

Gay marriage is another issue of fairness and equality that is opposed largely in fear and prejudice. It may happen via the ballot box in many states (several have done so already), but if it takes a court decision, so be it.
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:34 AM
 
18,836 posts, read 37,392,821 times
Reputation: 26469
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
New Jersey court to allow same-sex marriages

Way to go New Jersey! Which state will be next?
I have always felt Nevada was missing the boat here...on cashing in on these DINK couples! With many friends like that as well. Gay Couples More Educated, Higher-Income Than Heterosexual Couples - US News and World Report

Nevada should have joined this boat years ago, and advertised the state as a Mecca for same sex couples, and welcomed these folks, (and their cash) to have extravagant weddings in Veags or Reno...think over the top, Libarace style bashes....or even just small, elegant weddings. The state needs the influx of economic capital. Shunning these couples, who want to race to the chapel, unlike heterosexual couples who are now shunning marriage, these same sex couples are getting married in droves. It has been a stupid move to not embrace this...it was going to happen anyway....and now, Nevada is slow to get the gravy train...no doubt, due to the high amount of LDS folks in Nevada, and proximity to Utah.
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,057 posts, read 19,326,501 times
Reputation: 6922
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Yeah, that and the state and federal constitution.
Yeah, it seems a lot of people have forgotten that 7th grade civics lesson on the role of the courts in "checks and balances."
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:39 AM
 
Location: The Mitten.
2,539 posts, read 3,108,092 times
Reputation: 8997
Well done, New Jersey. I sincerely hope Michigan won't be too far behind. I suspect our gov'nor doesn't care that much one way or the other, but he is easily swayed by teaparty interests in Mich, such as they are.
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:45 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,229,657 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasper12 View Post
I have always felt Nevada was missing the boat here...on cashing in on these DINK couples! With many friends like that as well. Gay Couples More Educated, Higher-Income Than Heterosexual Couples - US News and World Report

Nevada should have joined this boat years ago, and advertised the state as a Mecca for same sex couples, and welcomed these folks, (and their cash) to have extravagant weddings in Veags or Reno...think over the top, Libarace style bashes....or even just small, elegant weddings. The state needs the influx of economic capital. Shunning these couples, who want to race to the chapel, unlike heterosexual couples who are now shunning marriage, these same sex couples are getting married in droves. It has been a stupid move to not embrace this...it was going to happen anyway....and now, Nevada is slow to get the gravy train...no doubt, due to the high amount of LDS folks in Nevada, and proximity to Utah.
Just look a Massachusetts.
Quote:
In Massachusetts, the Williams Institute estimated that marriage equality added $111 million to the state's economy in the first five years after legalizing same-sex marriages in 2004. That's thanks to wedding spending by same-sex couples who live there, in addition to an influx of same-sex couples coming from elsewhere to say "I do."
And New York.
Quote:
In New York the city's comptroller's office estimated that the economic impact of marriage equality would add $142 million to New York City's economy from wedding-related purchases and tourism revenue in the three years after its law passed in 2011, and another $184 million in spending to the state's economy.
And the federal government.
Quote:
If same-sex marriage rights were granted nationwide, same-sex weddings would generate a net $1 billion each year for the Federal budget over the next 10 years, according to a 2004 report by Congressional Budget Office. That's after taking into account lower income and estate tax revenues as well as increased spending for health-care benefits and Social Security
The gay marriage windfall - May. 10, 2012
 
Old 10-19-2013, 07:50 AM
 
624 posts, read 940,553 times
Reputation: 977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
So people who cry about liberties being withheld from them will be allowed to actively participate in oppressing other people and refusing them liberty?

Is that what you were trying to say? Maybe you need to "speak into the mic" more.

*taps you on the brain*

HELLLOOOOOOOO
Dude...what I'm saying is you're paranoid. It's good to look at the big picture, but you're doing so through a distorted lens.

These issues aren't connected in any significant way, except that if you are genuinely concerned about erosions of Liberty, the progress of SSM should be comforting, not disturbing.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top