Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well some of the donations may be more about helping people get reelected then actually thinking it will lead to instant change. Sort of like the bogus Obama appeals for organizing for action money.
Yeah, but they're not necessarily telling people that the money will be used for elections. They're telling people that it will be used to get rid of the ACA, which will not happen.
You're paying lawyers to fight something ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court. Good move.
When has the Supreme Court ruled that a tax increase passed in the Senate, and not the House, was Constitutional, despite the Constitution saying otherwise..
Are you that ignorant about the Constitution? I dont give a crap about the money.. some things in life are more important...
When has the Supreme Court ruled that a tax increase passed in the Senate, and not the House, was Constitutional, despite the Constitution saying otherwise..
Are you that ignorant about the Constitution? I dont give a crap about the money.. some things in life are more important...
Good luck with this.
Good grief. You're so eager for others not to have health care you're paying your own efforts in an effort to prevent it. Winner.
Yeah, but they're not necessarily telling people that the money will be used for elections. They're telling people that it will be used to get rid of the ACA, which will not happen.
Where did you get that the money is being used for elections? I dont see that anywhere on the site.. Are you just making things up again?
Are you that ignorant about the Constitution? I dont give a crap about the money.. some things in life are more important...
The final arbiter of Constitutionality is the Supreme Court-- They ruled it Constitutional. I don't think I am the one who is ignorant of the Constitution. Maybe you're SELECTIVELY ignorant of the constitution?
The final arbiter of Constitutionality is the Supreme Court-- They ruled it Constitutional. I don't think I am the one who is ignorant of the Constitution. Maybe you're SELECTIVELY ignorant of the constitution?
You still havent answered the question,
When did the Supreme Court rule a tax increase passed in the Senate, but not the House, was constitutional?
Did you even read the Constitution where it says ALL tax increases must pass the House FIRST?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
