Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2013, 06:02 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,401,146 times
Reputation: 4212

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Having said that would you agree that the government shouldn't interfere with the firearms rights of law abiding citizens to try and prevent that once in a lifetime situation?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
You are allowed to own firearms.

There's the question once again just in case you decide to attempt to actually answer it at some point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2013, 06:20 AM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,285 posts, read 10,859,260 times
Reputation: 10010
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Schools seem to be turning into prison like places.
And the "evolution" continues.

Drug sniffing dogs walking the hallways, locker checks for weapons/drugs, metal detectors at doors and now armed guards patrolling the halls.

And you want to send your 5 year old off to a place like this every day for the next 13 years ?
I'd prefer to send my children to a place that has armed guards to protect them than to send them to a "gun-free" hunting preserve for the criminally insane.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
I don't want my kids to be surrounded by guns at school. But I am facing reality that the gun nuts have created a dangerous society. I'm afraid that arming our schools is the only way to keep them safe.
The "gun nuts" haven't created the danger of society. First of all, society is dangerous by definition. When you take many people of different cultures and backgrounds and put them all together, there is going to be tension.

Second, what has contributed far more to society's danger than the 2nd Amendment ever has is the catch and release prison for profit system that the United States has embraced. Under this system, which makes the mistaken assumption that violent offenders can be rehabilitated, there is no true deterrent for someone who wishes to commit a violent act.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 08:41 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,262,481 times
Reputation: 3412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemical_Brothers View Post
Didn't a lot of NRA supporters want armed teachers. That's not quite the same as security guards
And that was my point. Far right conservatives on this board were cheering about the idea of arming teachers, but now, because the Obama administration announced they plan to expand and enhance an EXISTING grant program to put 1,000 more law enforcement officers (school resource officers) in schools--they think the administration has either changed their position on guns OR that it's the end of the world. Our school currently has a school resource officer through a federal grant awarded to our sheriff's department.

You have to laugh--the loonies on both sides either make this board painful to read, or highly entertaining, depending on the day.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2487509.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 08:42 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,262,481 times
Reputation: 3412
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
What? I called you out or something? Well, if I did, it must have hit to close to home....
You quoted me, you were wrong, and now you're deflecting. Typical for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,380 posts, read 26,599,643 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
There's the question once again just in case you decide to attempt to actually answer it at some point.
I agree that you have the right to own a fire arm but that right comes with restrictions, so no I don't believe you have an unqualified right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 10:05 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 85,027,307 times
Reputation: 27720
All those "gun free zone" signs need to come down now.

New sign: "armed guards on the premise"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,380 posts, read 26,599,643 times
Reputation: 15709
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
I'd prefer to send my children to a place that has armed guards to protect them than to send them to a "gun-free" hunting preserve for the criminally insane.
How far do you go with that, what happens when kids leave the school for other activities, do we need armed guard escorts at football games, boy scouts. Seems like an overreaction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 11:12 AM
 
10,092 posts, read 8,262,481 times
Reputation: 3412
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
All those "gun free zone" signs need to come down now.

New sign: "armed guards on the premise"
If your school/community doesn't want a school resource officer, they don't have to get one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 11:18 AM
 
46,673 posts, read 27,527,689 times
Reputation: 11299
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
You quoted me, you were wrong, and now you're deflecting. Typical for you.
How was I deflecting? You have still to provide your spin....oh thats right, you cannot prove what you say because it is BS....

Figures coming from a leftist....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2013, 11:30 AM
 
46,673 posts, read 27,527,689 times
Reputation: 11299
Quote:
Originally Posted by mb1547 View Post
And that was my point. Far right conservatives on this board were cheering about the idea of arming teachers, but now, because the Obama administration announced they plan to expand and enhance an EXISTING grant program to put 1,000 more law enforcement officers (school resource officers) in schools--they think the administration has either changed their position on guns OR that it's the end of the world. Our school currently has a school resource officer through a federal grant awarded to our sheriff's department.

You have to laugh--the loonies on both sides either make this board painful to read, or highly entertaining, depending on the day.
Obama On Guns: School Police Should Be Funded By Federal Government, But Not Required
BS, there were lefties all over this board stating cops or armed teachers was a bad idea, then low and behold, obama says...well maybe....and now the left is in lock step spinning saying they wanted this the entire time....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top