Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-30-2013, 10:57 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
I'll address something. The Obama administration tried to hide it being a terrorist attack as Obama ran around campaigning for the 2012 election.

Osama Bin Laden is dead and Al-quaeda is on the run.
bin laden is dead and al-quaeda is at its lowest point in decades, he never claimed it was gone, and LOL @ "tried to hide it being a terrorist attack". Really ? did he claim they died in a car crash on the way to Tripoli ???

Ansar al-Sharia is also not a part of Al-quaeda.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:00 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,423,692 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
bin laden is dead and al-quaeda is at its lowest point in decades, he never claimed it was gone, and LOL @ "tried to hide it being a terrorist attack". Really ? did he claim they died in a car crash on the way to Tripoli ???

Ansar al-Sharia is also not a part of Al-quaeda.
Wow, you are totally desperate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:01 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And neither have the Democrats on that investigative committee.
You're only looking at one side here.

Cummings already came to the conclusion that were was no coverup, no lies, no misleading and this is all a big smear campaign against the Dems and Obama.

Is that objective and impartial ?
I never claimed to be impartial, but republicans did and they surely are not. What they have done is a mockery .

As for Cumming own conclusion,we did not learn anything new from the previous round of hearing other than that Republican aides cut and pasted emails and then sent them to news organizations.

and There is no cover up, again, President Obama did not get on TV and claim they died in a car accident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:02 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by eRayP View Post
Wow, you are totally desperate.
So refute what i said then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I never claimed to be impartial, but republicans did and they surely are not. What they have done is a mockery .

As for Cumming own conclusion,we did not learn anything new from the previous round of hearing other than that Republican aides cut and pasted emails and then sent them to news organizations.

and There is no cover up, again, President Obama did not get on TV and claim they died in a car accident.
I watched/listened to the hearings and those modified emails were not part of it.

Maybe you need to go and read the transcripts of the hearings because what you are posting didn't happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:13 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I watched/listened to the hearings and those modified emails were not part of it.

Maybe you need to go and read the transcripts of the hearings because what you are posting didn't happen.
The emails were not apart of the hearing, but they were requested during such. Thats how they became public.

should have made that more clear. The bigger point of my comment, which you skipped over, is that we didnt learn anything new that pointed to a cover up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:25 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,495,383 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
What does that have to do with this thread topic? You're hijacking this which is a direct violation of the TOS. Oh yeah, you're the guy that thinks Chris Matthews is fair and balanced. Never mind, carry on. LOLOLOLOLOL
The information upon which the OP started this discussion and offered comments is about as off the wall as the question I asked. It's my response and I obviously thought it was appropriate. It illustrates what I belive is the idiocy of such fishing expeditions which people now cite seriously.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:25 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,423,692 times
Reputation: 1179
We are witnessing a disturbing pattern. President Obama always puts the best interest, well-being, and rights of our enemies above providing protection and justice for the American people.

Benghazi: The Obama administration paid lip service expressing its regrets that 4 Americans died. As a matter of fact, U.S. assets in the area ready to come to the defense of Ambassador Stevens were ordered to stand down by someone of power in the Obama administration. They have lied and done everything in their power to cover up what happened in Benghazi, and to stonewall anyone trying to find out the truth.

The Ft Hood shooting: Sgt. Lunsford, shot 7 times in the Ft. Hood terrorist attack, is stuck with paying his own medical bills. The shooter, Nidal Hasan, has been paid $278,000 while awaiting trial. Because the Obama administration insists on classifying the shooting as "workplace violence" rather than a "terrorist attack," Sgt. Lunsford and other shooting victims are denied combat-related pay. They are not eligible for Purple Heart retirement or medical benefits.

Fort Hood was unquestionably a terrorist attack. Before shooting, Hasan yelled, "Allahu Akbar!" Once again, our enemy, Hasan, is well-taken care of by the Obama administration, while Sgt. Lunsford and fellow great American gets the shaft.

Boston marathon: Lives were brutality changed forever: loved ones gone (dead), limbs blown off, and hundreds severely injured. Upon arresting an Islamic terrorist for the bombing, Obama's Justice Department immediately ran to make sure Tsarnaev was read his Miranda rights and provided with high-powered elite attorneys, again paid for by us taxpayers. Tsarnaev stopped talking. Why would Obama provide cover for Tsarnaev to not answer questions vital to the safety of the American people?

Gitmo: Another example of Obama's obsession with coddling our enemies while putting Americans at risk is Obama's desire to close Guantánamo Bay. Guantánamo detainees are the worst of the worst, caught on the battlefield trying to kill Americans.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/..._above_us.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:26 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,495,383 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
What involvement did the RNC have with Benghazi emails ?
Or is this purely "revenge" schoolyard tactics ?
If the RNC had no involvement it should have no objection to turning-over emails in any such request. Deny the request and they're guilty. See how silly all of that in the OP sounds?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2013, 11:27 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by gomexico View Post
If the RNC had no involvement it should have no objection to turning-over emails in any such request. Deny the request and they're guilty. See how silly all of that in the OP sounds?
And who is asking for RNC emails ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top