Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NO THEY DIDNT, this is why Elijah Cumming and what he said mattered. They didnt agree and AL Jazeera in total said 3 different groups claimed responsibility. Just because they got one right doesnt mean they knew from the start which one of the 3 was telling the truth.
well atleast you admit that.
We were supposed to believe it was because of a video... yea.
NO THEY DIDNT, this is why Elijah Cumming and what he said mattered. They didnt agree and AL Jazeera in total said 3 different groups claimed responsibility. Just because they got one right doesnt mean they knew from the start which one of the 3 was telling the truth.
well atleast you admit that.
US Intelligence screwed up..royally screwed up and missed a planned attack on their own base.
The CIA had warned on Sept. 10, 2012, one day before the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, of the possibility of a jihadist attack.
Warned about an attack in Cairo linked to the video.
Quote:
Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were determined to conceal amidst the heated and closely contested 2012 presidential campaign. If they could convince the American people that both the Cairo and Benghazi events were spontaneous, then they could not be accused of failing to prevent the violent outbreaks that occurred.
The CIA was the agency that claimed the attack in Benghazi started as a spontaneous event.
Quote:
The Obama administration did not heed the warning of the intelligence community, nor have the good sense to fortify defenses in a “high-risk” outpost such as the consulate in Benghazi.
Every part of this story reveals the glaring failures of Mr. Obama’s foreign policy: The pro-jihadist rally in Cairo exposed the president as having badly miscalculated from the start of his term. There, in the very place where on June 4, 2009, he had proclaimed “a new beginning” for America and the Muslim world, terrorists now spewed hatred on the United States and celebrated Osama bin Laden as their champion and hero. And they also continued to threaten imminent violence.
NO THEY DIDNT, this is why Elijah Cumming and what he said mattered. They didnt agree and AL Jazeera in total said 3 different groups claimed responsibility. Just because they got one right doesnt mean they knew from the start which one of the 3 was telling the truth.
well atleast you admit that.
Yes, says the man who publicly thinks this investigation is one big smear campaign.
We agree on that, but address the content of my post.
I'll address something. The Obama administration tried to hide it being a terrorist attack as Obama ran around campaigning for the 2012 election.
Osama Bin Laden is dead and Al-quaeda leadership is decimated and on the run. Do you feel safer now?
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,556 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan
Yes, says the man who publicly thinks this investigation is one big smear campaign.
It is, Republicans have gone form blaming Susan Rice(and then attacking the Administration for not hiring enough people of color in the cabinet), to attacking the President, to attacking Secretary Clinton.
No where in any of this have republicans gone after the CIA even after Peter King got on TV and said David Petreaus lied.
Really? You accepted MSNBC's version and claim you tend to take the time to investigate LOLOL
MSNBC's version of what? The source I've read the most over the Benghazi emails is Hayes in the Weekly Standard. However, I also took the time to read the source material his reporting was based on.
It is, Republicans have gone form blaming Susan Rice(and then attacking the Administration for not hiring enough people of color in the cabinet), to attacking the President, to attacking Secretary Clinton.
No where in any of this have republicans gone after the CIA even after Peter King got on TV and said David Petreaus lied.
And neither have the Democrats on that investigative committee.
You're only looking at one side here.
Cummings already came to the conclusion that were was no coverup, no lies, no misleading and this is all a big smear campaign against the Dems and Obama.
Is that objective and impartial ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
