Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:37 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,809,303 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

The Obama administration is celebrating the unemployment rate dropping to 7.6% in March... and hoping people don't notice it's because more than 600,000 people have quit looking for work altogether.

In U.S. Labor Dept statistics, only people actually looking for work, get counted as "unemployed". So when huge numbers of people give up looking for work altogether and drop out (as happened last month), that actually makes the "unemployment" number look BETTER.

88,000 jobs were created in March - barely enough to keep up with population growth. So, it's just as hard to find a job now, as it was last month, with no improvement.

------------------------------------------------------------

Record 89,967,000 Not in Labor Force; Another 663,000 Drop Out In March | CNS News

Record 89,967,000 Not in Labor Force; Another 663,000 Drop Out In March

April 5, 2013
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - A record 89,967,000 Americans were not in the labor force in March, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That is an increase of 663,000 from the 89,304,000 Americans who were not in the labor force in February.

Since President Barack Obama was first inaugurated in January 2009, 9,460,000 people have dropped out of the labor force.

The BLS counts a person as not in the civilian labor force if they are at least 16 years old, are not in the military or an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home, and have not actively looked for a job in the last four weeks. The department counts a person as in the civilian labor force if they are at least 16, are not in the military or an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home, and either do have a job or have actively looked for one in the last four weeks.

The number of people that BLS considers "in the labor force" affects the unemployment rate--which is the percentage of people "in the labor force" who are unable to find a job during the month. If someone previously considered "not in the labor force" were to go out and search for a job and not find one, they would have to be counted as in the labor force for that period--and thus would increase the unemployment rate.

To the degree that Americans choose to simply drop out of the labor force rather than search unsuccessful for a job they decrease the unemployment rate.

In keeping with the increase in the number of people not in the labor force, the labor force participation rate decreased from 63.5 percent in February to 63.3 percent in March. The labor force participation rate is the percentage of Americans in the civilian population over age 16 who did not have a job or seek a job during the month.

In January 2009, when Obama was first inaugurated, there were 80,507,000 people not in the labor force compared to the 89,967,000 who were not in the labor force in March.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,711,619 times
Reputation: 9177
Yep.

Unemployment is 1979 level.

When Jimmah Cartah was prez.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:42 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,852,783 times
Reputation: 6509
Just more Obama math
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:47 AM
 
Location: On Top
12,373 posts, read 13,223,414 times
Reputation: 4027
Gotta love how the right includes people retiring in the numbers "giving up looking"! You realize baby boomers are retiring in huge numbers right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:50 AM
 
17,290 posts, read 29,466,745 times
Reputation: 8691
So people are "giving up looking huh?"

Too good to find any kind of work they can get, so they prefer to not work at all?


And where do they go? If they're able bodied they can't get gov assistance. If not retired they won't have social security and pension.

They all moving in together?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:51 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,852,783 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Gotta love how the right includes people retiring in the numbers "giving up looking"! You realize baby boomers are retiring in huge numbers right?
Actually boomers are working longer into life than any previous generation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/bo...n-booming.html

The stock and housing crash of the last 5 years really did a number on 401k plans requiring boomers to work even more.

In summation, your wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,342,445 times
Reputation: 11416
Since the "job creators" aren't creating, cut their tax breaks/incentives.
It's apparently not working.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:53 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,852,783 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
So people are "giving up looking huh?"

Too good to find any kind of work they can get, so they prefer to not work at all?


And where do they go? If they're able bodied they can't get gov assistance. If not retired they won't have social security and pension.

They all moving in together?
They are going on ssdi at an alarming rate.
Disabled America: 5.4 Million Join Social Security Disability Insurance Rolls Under Obama - Investors.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,894,577 times
Reputation: 20675
Why do people look to government to create jobs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:55 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,135 posts, read 16,242,226 times
Reputation: 28390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
The BLS counts a person as not in the civilian labor force if they are at least 16 years old, are not in the military or an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home, and have not actively looked for a job in the last four weeks. The department counts a person as in the civilian labor force if they are at least 16, are not in the military or an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home, and either do have a job or have actively looked for one in the last four weeks.
So my 16 year old daughter whose job, as far as I am concerned, is to go to school is counted in the numbers of those not participating or giving up? They need to add full-time student exemption to the definition of the work force. Or up the age to 18.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top