Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-07-2013, 01:48 AM
 
Location: Australia
1,057 posts, read 1,700,807 times
Reputation: 1709

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
It's irrelevant whether anybody ever died from it. You don't die from a broken arm. It's still a medical condition.
It is possible to die from a broken bone actually.


Quote:
Pregnancy is a medical condition and pregnancy is covered as well as any complications that result from pregnancy. I didn't say pregnancy wasn't a medical condition, I said the desire not to become pregnant isn't a medical condition.
Pregnancy is a medical condition, therefore contraception is preventative medical treatment.



Quote:
If you're getting the pill for some other reason then it isn't birth control and would be covered as medication for whatever condition it has been prescribed for. At that point preventing pregnancy is merely a side effect.
Why exactly shouldn't the pill be prescribed purely for contraceptive purposes? Women pay into insurance too.

I bet people like you would be the first ones to complain if women weren't able to afford birth control, got pregnant, pushed out babies they never wanted and couldn't afford and then went on public assistance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-07-2013, 01:51 AM
 
Location: California
37,218 posts, read 42,537,829 times
Reputation: 35084
ED is just natures way of telling you not to have sex so just don't have sex and shut up about it. But if we are gonig to allow more men to have sex that would ordinarily be able to via drugs we sure as hell better cover the back end too...so to speak...and keep all that sperm from doing something it wouldn't otherwise be doing.

Silly arguement, I don't think one should have anything to do with the other and I'm half joking...but ED isn't something anyone else but the individual should be paying for since it's not an illness, disease or injury. Way less impact on health and society than pregnancy too. Sometimes you just have to face facts, and the facts are that BC pills benifit everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:08 AM
 
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
11,222 posts, read 16,539,941 times
Reputation: 13536
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
It's irrelevant whether anybody ever died from it. You don't die from a broken arm. It's still a medical condition.

11,696 Americans die every year from fractures.

Deaths from Fractures - RightDiagnosis.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:33 AM
 
Location: Liberal Coast
4,280 posts, read 6,122,185 times
Reputation: 3925
Quote:
Originally Posted by tazzled View Post
Source: Medical Uses of the Birth Control Pill

And this is just for the pill.

But none of these health issues matter, right? A woman should just pay her $15-95/month (depending on health plans) and shut up.
The pill does not usually treat those illnesses. All it does is mask the symptoms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:35 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,493,454 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by StabbyAbby View Post
It is possible to die from a broken bone actually.
Don't be pedantic. A condition not being fatal doesn't mean it isn't a condition.

Quote:
Pregnancy is a medical condition, therefore contraception is preventative medical treatment.
Starvation is a medical condition. Therefore food is a preventative medical treatment. Illegitimate reasoning.

Quote:
Why exactly shouldn't the pill be prescribed purely for contraceptive purposes?
I already answered that question. Because "I don't want to get pregnant" isn't a medical condition.

Similarly, "I don't want to get an STD" doesn't make prophylactics covered for men. Nor should it.

Not wanting to face the consequences of engaging in sex, which is a voluntary activity, does not make preventing those consequences into healthcare. It is not a medical insurance company's responsibility to subsidize anybody's sex life.

Now if those pills are being used to treat an actual health problem, then by all means they should be covered by medical insurance.

Quote:
Women pay into insurance too.
Who cares if women pay into insurance too? That's not relevant in any way. It is the nature of the product or service that determines what is covered, not the gender of the person paying the premiums.

Quote:
I bet people like you would be the first ones to complain if women weren't able to afford birth control, got pregnant, pushed out babies they never wanted and couldn't afford and then went on public assistance.
It's irrelevant what "people like me" would complain about. That's an entirely different subject.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:38 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,493,454 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnatomicflux View Post
11,696 Americans die every year from fractures.

Deaths from Fractures - RightDiagnosis.com
Okay, how many people a year die from ingrown hair follicles?

Picking on the example chosen doesn't change the point. Things do not have to be fatal to be medical conditions. Saying "nobody died from that" doesn't mean it isn't a medical condition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:48 AM
 
Location: Australia
1,057 posts, read 1,700,807 times
Reputation: 1709
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
Okay, how many people a year die from ingrown hair follicles?

Picking on the example chosen doesn't change the point. Things do not have to be fatal to be medical conditions. Saying "nobody died from that" doesn't mean it isn't a medical condition.
Ingrown hairs don't negatively effect the rest of society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:49 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,493,454 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
ED is just natures way of telling you not to have sex so just don't have sex and shut up about it. But if we are gonig to allow more men to have sex that would ordinarily be able to via drugs we sure as hell better cover the back end too...so to speak...and keep all that sperm from doing something it wouldn't otherwise be doing.

Silly arguement, I don't think one should have anything to do with the other and I'm half joking...but ED isn't something anyone else but the individual should be paying for since it's not an illness, disease or injury. Way less impact on health and society than pregnancy too. Sometimes you just have to face facts, and the facts are that BC pills benifit everyone.
Interesting that you should say one thing shouldn't be covered because it isn't an illness, disease, or injury and then say BC pills should be covered when they aren't an illness, disease, or injury. You kind of defeated yourself with your own argument there.

In fact, your argument means that pregnancy itself should not be covered. Only complications which might arise from it. Pregnancy is not an illness, disease, or injury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:50 AM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,493,454 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by StabbyAbby View Post
Ingrown hairs don't negatively effect the rest of society.
So? Now something must negatively affect the rest of society to be considered a medical condition? Ever heard of "moving the goalpost"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-07-2013, 02:52 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,418,596 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
ED is just natures way of telling you not to have sex so just don't have sex and shut up about it. But if we are gonig to allow more men to have sex that would ordinarily be able to via drugs we sure as hell better cover the back end too...so to speak...and keep all that sperm from doing something it wouldn't otherwise be doing.

Silly arguement, I don't think one should have anything to do with the other and I'm half joking...but ED isn't something anyone else but the individual should be paying for since it's not an illness, disease or injury. Way less impact on health and society than pregnancy too. Sometimes you just have to face facts, and the facts are that BC pills benifit everyone.
I'm old.
I benefit from ED drugs.
Just sayin'.

Attachment 108294
Lucky women, wrong no matter what the choice.

Cost to society for raising unplanned/unwanted children: poverty, behavior, crime, abuse, etc.
Some people obviously think it's worth the cost.

Last edited by chielgirl; 03-07-2013 at 03:00 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top