Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bolded portions of your post are certainly personal attacks. I've had it with your patronizing me and insulting me and the personal attacks. I HEAR your high estimation of yourself. But I'm not impressed; I've known lots of legal secretaries.
I've never claimed to be any sort of "legal eagle." Nor have I claimed to be an expert, but you continue to exaggerate these things for some strange reason. It certainly appears that I've struck a nerve with you...your post is totally full of obvious contempt for me on a personal level. You're discussing ME and MY background, and what you THINK MY knowledge is. You've done nothing in your post but be critical of me and make negative assumptions about me and brag about yourself and how knowledgeable you are.
Didn't anybody ever tell you that not everything you read or hear is true? Have you ever been paid to investigate anything, a legal case, or get paid as an investigative journalist, or anything? There seems to be a creative element missing in your thinking based on your posts.
p.s. This forum is NOT my world and it's NOT my work. It is ENTERTAINMENT. I'm not going to approach every thread I find interesting as if it's a "job" and do the same kind of "research" here which I would do in my work. I come here for entertainment; not to "prove" anything to anyone. However, maybe CD is something other than just entertainment for you and you have the time on your hands to pursue everything with passion.
I've yet to see one - ONE - poster agree with you.
Let's see :
You: joined April 2012, 6-1/2 months 3,736 posts.
Me: joined August 2011, 13-1/3 months 2,921 posts.
You may want to find other ways to entertain yourself.
BTW, you are very entertaining - in a strange sort of way.
Dana Milbank picked up on the same problem: inadequate diplomatic security is the direct result of Republican budget cuts.
For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department's
Worldwide Security Protection program -- well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration's request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration's request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans' proposed cuts to her department would be "detrimental to America's national security" -- a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan's budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Once again facts have crashed the Republicans' parade. This is a great rebuttal the President can use against Romney who will no doubt try to exploit the embassy attack in the foreign policy debate.
Once again facts have crashed the Republicans' parade. This is a great rebuttal the President can use against Romney who will no doubt try to exploit the embassy attack in the foreign policy debate.
4 people dead and all you are worried about is your getting revenge for your tarnished party ?
Don't you ****s get it? Obama denied giving them any real protection. Has nothing to do with some appropriation. As if spending restraints ever stopped this bastard before.
Dana Milbank picked up on the same problem: inadequate diplomatic security is the direct result of Republican budget cuts.
For fiscal 2013, the GOP-controlled House proposed spending $1.934 billion for the State Department's Worldwide Security Protection program -- well below the $2.15 billion requested by the Obama administration. House Republicans cut the administration's request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012. (Negotiations with the Democrat-controlled Senate restored about $88 million of the administration's request.) Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans' proposed cuts to her department would be "detrimental to America's national security" -- a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan's budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
This is unreal. Madcow and the rest of the liberal idiots didnt want to talk about this story. But when they think they have a way to go after the GOP on it, they suddently still dont want to talk about it but will talk about it in context of GOP only.
A Romney State Dept would make sure they get security needed OR get our people out of there. YOUR Administration DID NOT DO THIS SO FOUR AMERICANS ARE DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get it you stupid ****ers?!!!!!?!?!?!
A Romney State Dept would make sure they get security needed OR get our people out of there. YOUR Administration DID NOT DO THIS SO FOUR AMERICANS ARE DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Get it you stupid ****ers?!!!!!?!?!?!
First off, you have to proof for your belief that Romney would have done any different if those cuts are what the House came back with.
First off, you have to proof for your belief that Romney would have done any different if those cuts are what the House came back with.
Secondly, you need to cam down.
He has been going on like that for a month now
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
: 
