Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2012, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,852,890 times
Reputation: 6438

Advertisements

John Boehner’s push to redefine rape - Salon.com

"It shouldn't be shocking: The goal is no abortions for rape survivors. Because the goal is no abortions, for anyone."

 
Old 08-21-2012, 01:45 PM
 
5,906 posts, read 5,742,936 times
Reputation: 4570
Because they feel women should suffer, simply for being female.

Every sperm is sacred.

Every fertilized egg is sacred.

A female's life is worth less than a male's.**


Their statements continually express the overwhelming desire to denigrate, demean, and diminish women in this society.


**Edit: Proven by the attempts to either humiliate a female seeking abortion (unnecessary vaginal ultrasounds and other coercive tactics), suspecting miscarriages as self-inflicted, disbelieving rape victims' honesty. Men are not subject to these actions or any male-appropriate countermeasures. Men have autonomy of their bodies. An entire political party wants to control the bodies of a single gender, ergo to rule over them.

Last edited by rayneinspain; 08-21-2012 at 01:53 PM..
 
Old 08-21-2012, 01:53 PM
 
19,023 posts, read 25,998,527 times
Reputation: 7366
Evidently Akin is a fools fool, and H3 is not the same law it had been as Stupak-Pitts. I am a conserv and I disagree with H3 as written.

That Akin guy must be into voo doo.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:23 PM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,488 posts, read 11,308,593 times
Reputation: 9005
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayneinspain View Post
Because they feel women should suffer, simply for being female.

Every sperm is sacred.

Every fertilized egg is sacred.

A female's life is worth less than a male's.**


Their statements continually express the overwhelming desire to denigrate, demean, and diminish women in this society.


**Edit: Proven by the attempts to either humiliate a female seeking abortion (unnecessary vaginal ultrasounds and other coercive tactics), suspecting miscarriages as self-inflicted, disbelieving rape victims' honesty. Men are not subject to these actions or any male-appropriate countermeasures. Men have autonomy of their bodies. An entire political party wants to control the bodies of a single gender, ergo to rule over them.
So, what measures do you see coming from the republican party to control women who are past childbearing age?

Fyi, I do not expect to hear back from you because I know you won't have an answer ergo your whole tirade is an unhinged lie.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Texas
1,767 posts, read 2,351,988 times
Reputation: 634
.

Why is it that liberals never talk about ridding society of the evil rapists and other criminals.


.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,852,890 times
Reputation: 6438
Why is it that conservatives try and change the subject.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:49 PM
 
5,906 posts, read 5,742,936 times
Reputation: 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by king's highway View Post
.

Why is it that liberals never talk about ridding society of the evil rapists and other criminals.


.
I think you've missed quite a few threads.

This liberal thinks that rape should be punishable, at the very least, by life in prison.

I don't believe they ever stop.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,891,716 times
Reputation: 12950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
So, what measures do you see coming from the republican party to control women who are past childbearing age?

Fyi, I do not expect to hear back from you because I know you won't have an answer ergo your whole tirade is an unhinged lie.
Well, for one, it seems like there's a popular push among certain male politicans on the right to create a litmus test to define what constitutes a "legitimate" rape. I'm sure that makes women who have been raped feel absolutely full of freedom and accurate representation.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 02:59 PM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,409,393 times
Reputation: 7803
Republicans are for preserving the unborn and killing as many of the already born as possible.
 
Old 08-21-2012, 03:02 PM
 
5,906 posts, read 5,742,936 times
Reputation: 4570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Joshua View Post
So, what measures do you see coming from the republican party to control women who are past childbearing age?
Rape. Birth control (even when used for non-contraceptive means).

I have a daughter, late teens. Regardless, I have a vested interest whether or not I choose to have more children, or even if I were post-menopausal. I am female, and that's all that counts...not whether or not I wish to procreate.

Age makes no difference with regard to women's issues.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top