Picture of Lesbians Kissing in Urban Outfitters Mag (boycott, school, compared)

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by roysoldboy

Do you really think doc is wrong for saying that it isn't nearly as prevalent as the queers and the media would have us think?

No...i'm saying he's wrong for complaining that it's being "pushed" on anyone when it isn't.

[Whyfor]

Originally Posted by Oleg Bach

Homosexuality does exist...but NOT to the extent that media portrays it...It is NOT the norm...to display it as the norm...is a lie...


Keep your personal life private....

Considering that this is one picture in what is likely a 50+ page magazine, I would dare to say that they are in fact underrepresenting the ratio of gay to straight that exists in "the real world".

I would also point out that something can be "normal", yet only exist in a minority of the population. There are so many examples to choose from outside of the whole homosexuality "debate" that I don't understand why that's such a hard concept to grasp.

[gallowsCalibrator]

Originally Posted by twinArmageddons

I know that it's only a simple google search away, but I still can't help but be dissapointed by the lack of tongue.

True.

Time to look up some SolKat to satisfy my craving for homosexual sloppy makeouts.

Originally Posted by twinArmageddons

THen again, after seeing the real deal, even google search isn't as hot.

You make me blush, good sir.

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator

I am not 0kay with this picture. I demand copious amounts of tongue, less clothing, and more groping.

Yea, really. I was hoping for something FAR more salacious than what i got. In fact, i'm p*ssed that the OP posted something so tame.

[trlhiker]

Originally Posted by theredsnowman

Studies indicate that individuals who are afraid to accept their own homosexuality are extremely hostile toward homosexuals.

Agreed and more often than not, they are usually republicans.

[twinArmageddons]

Originally Posted by renault

I'm tired of companies using homosexuality as a gimmick to spark interest in their dying business.

>Urban outfitters
>Dying business



Anyways, showing a picture of two people engaging in seemingly homosexual activity to sell a product is no different than showing a picture of two people enganging in seemingly heterosexual activity to sell a product.

Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator

You make me blush, good sir.

Oh, fun past experiences.

I'm a very lucky man.

[doctrain]

Originally Posted by Whyfor

the spectacle some seem to be trying to make it into.

YOu got that right. The media is turning it into a spectacle so we see it everywhere, hoping that this flooding the market with these images will convince us that it is an ordinary, everyday occurrence and just start giving it a shrug. Its an old brainwashing tactic. Works well on youth.

[twinArmageddons]

Originally Posted by doctrain

YOu got that right. The media is turning it into a spectacle so we see it everywhere, hoping that this flooding the market with these images will convince us that it is an ordinary, everyday occurrence and just start giving it a shrug. Its an old brainwashing tactic. Works well on youth.

A few pics every now and again=flooding the market.

Gotcha.

Anyways, it is a normal, every day occurence for me.

What with being married to a pansexual woman with preferences that shift more towards females than males, and my own rather "trappy" tastes myself.

[seattlerain]

Originally Posted by doctrain

YOu got that right. The media is turning it into a spectacle so we see it everywhere, hoping that this flooding the market with these images will convince us that it is an ordinary, everyday occurrence and just start giving it a shrug. Its an old brainwashing tactic. Works well on youth.

What is wrong with a business using any image it wants to use?

[doctrain]

Originally Posted by seattlerain

What is wrong with a business using any image it wants to use?

And what is wrong with people choosing not to shop at a business?