Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-20-2011, 06:32 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
352 posts, read 1,003,693 times
Reputation: 249

Advertisements

Why are the United States, Canada, European Union and Russia opposed to Palestine's bid to acheive statehood? I've been reading the online newspapers reading about how these states are opposed to Palestine's bid in the UN, but the newspapers don't explain the background and why they're opposed. Does Palestinian statehood encroach or compromise Israeli territory, sovereignty, or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-21-2011, 01:27 AM
 
43,620 posts, read 44,355,249 times
Reputation: 20541
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostSecularist View Post
Why are the United States, Canada, European Union and Russia opposed to Palestine's bid to acheive statehood? I've been reading the online newspapers reading about how these states are opposed to Palestine's bid in the UN, but the newspapers don't explain the background and why they're opposed. Does Palestinian statehood encroach or compromise Israeli territory, sovereignty, or something?
One of the issues is Jerusalem which Israel has declared as its undivided capital. The Palestinians also want to make part of Jerusalem their capital.
Another issue is that missile attacks from the Hamas controlled Gaza area continue periodically on Israeli civilian targets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 01:31 AM
 
13,186 posts, read 14,973,712 times
Reputation: 4555
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostSecularist View Post
Why are the United States, Canada, European Union and Russia opposed to Palestine's bid to acheive statehood? I've been reading the online newspapers reading about how these states are opposed to Palestine's bid in the UN, but the newspapers don't explain the background and why they're opposed. Does Palestinian statehood encroach or compromise Israeli territory, sovereignty, or something?
Our foreign policy in the Middle East is owned and controlled by right wing Neocons or right wing pro-Israeli Likudniks. Are you naive to think for one moment fairness, or higher principles play a part in US decision making?

Why does the World even care what the US thinks? It's been obvious for Decades we are not an honest broker. Politicians on both sides are tripping over themselves trying to prove how pro Israel and anti-Paletianian they are.

Move on World. The USA is corrupt and on a downward spiral.

And don't put Russia an the EU in the same basket as the US when it comes to Palestine. If not for the US, the Palestinians would have had their stolen land returned to the long ago.

Last edited by padcrasher; 09-21-2011 at 01:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 01:50 AM
 
Location: A Hot, Serious Place.
107 posts, read 67,776 times
Reputation: 119
Ask John Hagee.

Also, watch 'The Israel Lobby':
Quote:
Is one allowed to question that reality, or is the pro-Israel lobby so strong, financially and politically, that the relationship with Israel is taboo and therefore unmentionable? And what happens to those who dare expose the unmentionable? In March 2006 the American political scientists John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago) and Steve Walt (Harvard) published the controversial article 'The Israel Lobby and US foreign policy'. In it they state that it is not, or no longer, expedient for the US to support and protect present-day Israel. Together with the power shifts in Congress and the increasing doubts about the current Middle-East policy, this could become the fuse in the powder keg. Backlight talks to the people concerned in this 'new realism' debate. The documentary sheds light on both parties involved in the discussion: those who wish to maintain the strong tie between the US and Israel (Neocon Richard Perle, the Lebanese Christian Brigitte Gabriel and evangelist John Hagee, the lobby club AIPAC), and those who were critical of it and not infrequently became 'victims' of the lobby. Member of Congress Earl Hilliard from Alabama advocated a rapprochement with the Arab world and was promptly ousted by a political adversary who had the support of Aipac money.

The historian Tony Judt, who tried to maintain that Israel was becoming a belligerent and intolerant ethno-state, driven by religion, found a lecture canceled at the last minute. And the Human Rights Watch Director Kenneth Roth was personally attacked after he had criticized the violence Israel had used in the mini-war against Lebanon last summer. Finally the question arises in how far the pro-Israel lobby ultimately determines the military and political importance of Israel itself. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (Colin Powell's ex chief-of-staff) explains in how far the lobby's influence affects the decision-making structure in the White House. Member of Congress and Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich is asked in how far today's politicians can stay out of reach of the long arm of the pro-Israel lobby. The lobby, Congress, the White House and Israel itself seem to have ended up in a suffocating embrace: will it ever change and how could it?
DOCUMENTARY (as seen on Democracy Now):
:: Download The Israeli Lobby for Free. Watch The Israeli Lobby Online with Other Documentary Films and Free Movies. ::

Personally, I don't see why we're in the middle of two warring countries on the other side of the Earth.
Except for oil, no small thing I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 02:03 AM
 
Location: Ohio
3,437 posts, read 6,072,515 times
Reputation: 2700
There are NO "Palestinians". Where was all the talk when that area belong to other ARAB nations?

I think the US should pull out of that area(as well as Europe and SE Asia) and let things progress however they go. Those people have been at war with each other for the entirety of recorded history.

Israel will have to put them in their place ... again, they will feel comfortable just prior to the stone age.

The US has been holding back Israel for too long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 05:05 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,849,529 times
Reputation: 4585
Very dangerous to Israel and the Middle East. This issue being politicized by 2 leading GOP candidates, shows they have no understanding of the issues or don't care.

FACT CHECK: GOP candidates overreach on Israel - Houston Chronicle (http://www.chron.com/news/article/FACT-CHECK-GOP-candidates-overreach-on-Israel-2180935.php - broken link)

http://nymag.com/news/politics/israel-2011-9/

Last edited by florida.bob; 09-21-2011 at 05:13 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 05:32 AM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,730,816 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher
If not for the US, the Palestinians would have had their stolen land returned to the long ago.
If the Arabs and Jews in 1948 would have fought each other, then none of these threads would exist. If the bordering countries simply supplied arms, then again we would not be having these threads. The Arabs could have stated their independence and named it whatever. Instead the surrounding Arab nations crossed the border of the mandate and attacked the Jews from multiple sides. They told the Arabs living in the mandate to leave and that they would be able to return once all the Jews were dead. Thus the Arabs never had the chance to declare themselves thanks to the bordering Arab nations. In 1949 when the Armistance lines were drawn, the Arabs could have had a state at that point. Instead Gaza and Judea/Samaria were annexed by Egypt & Jordan. The US gov't had no part of this. We are at this juncture because the Arabs of the mandate still want it all.Gaza and Judea/Samaria were taken from Egypt & Jordan and not from any independant Palestinian country. The Palestinians could have worked out a deal over the past 40ish years with the Israelis. But each and everytime they came near a resolution the Arab leaderships added more items to their wish list.

If for some reason you think Israel could be undone, Then Belarus also needs to undone. The Jews could not move back to Poland because the Russians made everything east of bialastok into another country. Thus any returnees had no land to return too since it was in another country and all deed records were destroyed.

Thus the Arabs fought people in 1948 that had no where to go and now the Israelis are fighting Arabs who are not wanted in any other Arab country and also have no where to go. But the main difference here is that the Palestinians wont settle for some over nothing, while the Israelis did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 09:48 AM
 
13,648 posts, read 20,769,591 times
Reputation: 7650
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostSecularist View Post
Why are the United States, Canada, European Union and Russia opposed to Palestine's bid to acheive statehood? I've been reading the online newspapers reading about how these states are opposed to Palestine's bid in the UN, but the newspapers don't explain the background and why they're opposed. Does Palestinian statehood encroach or compromise Israeli territory, sovereignty, or something?
Because the Palestinians is still obligated to negotiate statehood vis-a-vis the Oslo Accords.

If the Palestinians had accepted UN Resolution 181 way back in 1947, they would have the very state they are now demanding. Indeed it would be bigger than anything they can hope to get now.

Furthermore, Palestine will ultimately encompass the West Bank and Gaza. Until 1967, these chunks of land were controlled by Jordan and Egypt respectively. Why the hell did they not establish Palestine when they had the chance?

I do not mean to imply Israel is blameless in all of this. Far from it. But this move is reckless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 09:52 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,864,597 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Our foreign policy in the Middle East is owned and controlled by right wing Neocons or right wing pro-Israeli Likudniks. Are you naive to think for one moment fairness, or higher principles play a part in US decision making?

Why does the World even care what the US thinks? It's been obvious for Decades we are not an honest broker. Politicians on both sides are tripping over themselves trying to prove how pro Israel and anti-Paletianian they are.

Move on World. The USA is corrupt and on a downward spiral.

And don't put Russia an the EU in the same basket as the US when it comes to Palestine. If not for the US, the Palestinians would have had their stolen land returned to the long ago.
Your 'explanation' does NOTHING to explain why the EU,Canada and Russia oppose Palestinian statehood....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-21-2011, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Fairfax, VA
3,826 posts, read 3,386,268 times
Reputation: 3694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trackwatch View Post
There are NO "Palestinians". Where was all the talk when that area belong to other ARAB nations?

I think the US should pull out of that area(as well as Europe and SE Asia) and let things progress however they go. Those people have been at war with each other for the entirety of recorded history.

Israel will have to put them in their place ... again, they will feel comfortable just prior to the stone age.

The US has been holding back Israel for too long.

The arabs did not even care about this part of the desert until the jews came along and developed it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top