Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-19-2011, 12:08 PM
 
608 posts, read 1,351,591 times
Reputation: 469

Advertisements

Most on modernizing?

Ok according to the 2012 and DOD budget page 3-6

Military Construction ($12.5 billion):
Includes funds to modernize DoD facilities
to support U.S. military and their families.
Includes construction to support the
beddown of new weapons systems, e.g.,
the F-35, F-22, MH-60, MV-22, E-2D, and
P-8A and the recapitalization of aging
facilities (worst first), to include schools,
dorms/barracks and medical facilities.
The FY 2012 Military Construction
investment funding is significantly less than the past 4 years.

$680 billion budget, military construction $12.5 billion.....yeah that's MOST
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-19-2011, 12:18 PM
 
608 posts, read 1,351,591 times
Reputation: 469
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
the military was cut in half (as far as personnel and equipment) during the 90's, yet spending still stayed about the same.....not exactlly good


we are spending right now, to fix the underspending and 'non-modernization' that was the 90's
Well, lets see....

According to the DOD..

Active Military personnel

1990 2.0 million
1999 1.4 million

(not quite half but ok, I give it to you)

2000 1.384 million
2007 1.383 million
2011 1.3 million

Wait a minute...what?

We spent $300 billion more each year, and had fewer soldiers!


Ok, if we got our numbers back up to 2 million soldiers I may buy it.

Reagan's HIGHEST budget was $580 billion still almost $200 billion less than Bush. We had only 2.1 million soldiers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,703,229 times
Reputation: 1962
You dont need bases in germany and japan and korea and leave IRAQ and Afghanistan etc.
Leave a few bases in the Uk and other small places and bring our troops home.
This will help with some of the debt, besides its not in the constitution to be the policemen of the world and we are broke.
If europe wants us to defend them from WW2 hitler who is DEAD we can start charging them money for every plane and bomb.
Build infustructure here and put those people to work here on projects if we are going to spend money on defense contracts. I would consider some kind of wall security on our borders would be a start. Or some kind of NASA funded miltiary Star wars program something if you talking about DEFENSE of OUR NATION. Leave the navy in the waters and the airforce ready at all times on our aircraft carriers! We can afford defense just not what we are doing now.
Before IRAQ and other wars we had plently of money for defense its not like everyone is just going to be unemployeed.

Ron Paul 2012
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,960 posts, read 19,641,588 times
Reputation: 9690
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrgy View Post
Well, lets see....

According to the DOD..

Active Military personnel

1990 2.0 million
1999 1.4 million

(not quite half but ok, I give it to you)

2000 1.384 million
2007 1.383 million
2011 1.3 million

Wait a minute...what?

We spent $300 billion more each year, and had fewer soldiers!


Ok, if we got our numbers back up to 2 million soldiers I may buy it.

Reagan's HIGHEST budget was $580 billion still almost $200 billion less than Bush. We had only 2.1 million soldiers.
your forgetting a main thing....inflation

when I joined the military in 1981 a private made 570 a month...today a private is making over 1400 a month....I retired as a First Sergeant in 2005/6( after getting injured in Iraq)....in 1983 an E8 made 1900 a month...today it 4900

Last edited by workingclasshero; 07-19-2011 at 12:42 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
38,760 posts, read 22,576,587 times
Reputation: 14216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
Good post, I do not know what your political affiliation is but I am on board with your suggestion of cutting down to the 450 billion average. That is some real savings and in 10 years it would knock off 2.3 trillion off the deficit. Hey you {R}s that say you are conservative where you at?
We got caught flat footed in WWII because we allowed our military to become and after thought, and we had to play catch up. The only way we were able to rebuild so fast was because we demanded the entire nation get behind our rebuilding of the military, fat chance of doing that today.

I'm not saying we need to always be in a state of war, but we need to continue to modernize our military. I hate war, but we cannot know where out next enemy will come from, or what form the threat will be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,387,918 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
We got caught flat footed in WWII because we allowed our military to become and after thought, and we had to play catch up. The only way we were able to rebuild so fast was because we demanded the entire nation get behind our rebuilding of the military, fat chance of doing that today.

I'm not saying we need to always be in a state of war, but we need to continue to modernize our military. I hate war, but we cannot know where out next enemy will come from, or what form the threat will be.
If we adopted a non interventionist foreign policy and ended both of our occupations I think 450 billion would be more then efficient to keep us on top militarily. But I am not hard headed lets make it 500 billion which would put a huge dent in the debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 09:28 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,820,953 times
Reputation: 5692
Good god that is a lot of money.

Does it include all the defense contractors?


I say $400 B would be PLENTY. Noone is even close to our power. If we want to build it up for some reason, we can RAISE TAXES. If something really goes down, we'll pay for it. We always have.

W thought he could do this while cutting taxes, and launching wars that did not have much support (Iraq).

I do agree with the guy upthread who says axing the military staff in the recession would not help, but come on, the private sector can pick them up, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2011, 10:43 PM
 
199 posts, read 217,363 times
Reputation: 163
Not going to happen.

Once US establishes a base in a country, US generally doesn't leave.

Germany, Japan, South Korea, Diego Garcia, Oman, Bahrain, Guam, plus many others. Big giant bases like Kandahar isn't just going to be left there for Talibans to take over, they are long long term projects.

Joe Biden even said US isn't leaving in 2014, Gates said US will stay in Afghanistan indefinitely.

Empire and imperialism cost money, even if it mean domestic citizens starve or die because of lack of health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-20-2011, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,960 posts, read 19,641,588 times
Reputation: 9690
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrgy View Post
.........What is most interesting is Reagan......... The military budget goes from 440 billion in 1980 to a high of 580 billion in 1985 and then drops back down to 523 billion.

Bush's father takes a 523 Billion budget, fights a war halfway across the world with it, and manages to leave office 4 years later with a military budget of 435 billion. .........Every Republican president has Lowered the military budget, every president that is except for one….
Little Bushy inherited a military budget of 412 billion. Clinton’s last budget allocated the least amount of money the Federal Government has ever spent on the military, since the end of WWII.



By the end of Bush’s term Bush leaves office spending the MOST amount of money ever on the military 718 billion. He defies history and his own party, and that is just in the military. He did the same thing in every major category in the budget. Before Bush, the highest the military budget had ever been was under Reagan…580 billion, and I remember everyone complaining that was too high, and Reagan even admitted it.


That is what Obama got. Obama received a military budget that was the highest ever in recorded human history on top of an economy that was already in collapse, an unemployment rate of 7.7% and a rising debt. Obama has cut the military budget down from 717 billion down to 676 billion and it is still going down but it is nowhere near earlier levels set by Reagan, Nixon and Eisenhower of an average of 450 billion.

shortend for eye sake
....
Quote:
Little Bushy inherited a military budget of 412 billion.
which would be the same as 551 billion in 2011 dollars

your little number thing is nice...but its like saying an actor in 1930 got paid only 50k...in 2011 dollars it would be 500k

bush1's 523 billion dollar budget....903 billion in todays dollars

here is a calc for you (ps you need to cut some of the zero's off for calculations)CPI Inflation Calculator

the 440 billion of 1980 (carters last year)...would be 1.2 trillion in todays' dollars
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top