Articles of Impeachment for Obama (Congress, lawyer, activist, weapon)

[bluesjuke]

Former Justice Department Lawyer writes the Articles;

» Congress Delivered Articles of Impeachment for tyrant Obama Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

[ovcatto]

You should...oh what's the point.

[bluesjuke]

Maybe you should read it.
It's pretty clear.
Contains only what the guy wrote, not AJ.

[Watchman57]

Activist Post: 10 Reasons Obama is Just As Bad or Worse Than Bush

[newonecoming2]

"31. Crowning the President with unilateral authority to commence war under the banner of anticipatory self-defense, prevention of civilian slaughters, gender discrimination, subjugation of ethnic or religious minorities, or otherwise would empower the President to initiate war without limit, threatening the very existence of the Republic. Although a benevolent Chief Executive might resist abuse of an unlimited war power, the principle, if ever accepted by Congress, would lie around like a loaded weapon ready for use by any successor craving absolute power." From the link.

It is the death of the Republic and the birth of the Empire. All hail Emperor Obama.

[bluesjuke]

36. Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 clarifies Presidential authority to undertake military action as follows:
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by bluesjuke

36. Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 clarifies Presidential authority to undertake military action as follows:
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

Or this new one....(4) Because I want to.

[ovcatto]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

Or this new one....(4) Because I want to.

Considering the 225 the U.S. has involved itself in foreign conflicts absent a declaration of war since 1790, I think you are probably right.

[Arus]

alex jones.. .whoopee ... yeah. credible...not

[bluesjuke]

The info is on many sites, I googled it and linked it.
This is not from Alex Jones, it is printed on his site among others. There is not commentary from him on the link either. whoopee!!!!!!!!! I had posted these Articles in part but it was deleted by Mods as I did not put a link to it and "too many sentences".
I had to find a link so I did.

Here was the original post;
Articles of Impeachment against Obama


It is widespread on the Net, choose your site.