Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-12-2018, 07:18 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,970,495 times
Reputation: 27279

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hey_guy View Post
What a non sequiter
I know what a non sequitur is but how does my post qualify as such?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-13-2018, 08:02 AM
 
2,844 posts, read 2,978,513 times
Reputation: 3529
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
I know what a non sequitur is but how does my post qualify as such?
my head is spinning at trying to exclude atlanta from "deep south"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 02:47 PM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,970,495 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by hey_guy View Post
my head is spinning at trying to exclude atlanta from "deep south"
If you consider all of Georgia as the Deep South then sure, but this ignores the fundamental differences between the coastal plain South, which was heavily reliant on agriculture and thus slave labor, and the Piedmont/Appalachia which was mostly characterized by poor Scots-Irish farming families with very little in the way of large-scale agriculture. Atlanta's origins comprise another narrative altogether as it was founded by the state of Georgia as an economic venture, namely, a rail hub. It never had many slaves to begin with and after it was burned during the Civil War, it quickly turned to a more industrial-based economy in light of the postbellum "New South" economic model championed by Henry Lee Grady.

In a broad sense Atlanta can be called the Deep South; being situated in the Piedmont, it became a critical commercial hub linking the cotton-producing coastal plain region not just with the Upper South but with large Midwestern markets, and it also attracted African Americans going all the way back to Reconstruction and the early 20th century. But in a strict physiographic and historical sense, Atlanta lies outside of the Deep South.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 05:39 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,679 posts, read 2,903,386 times
Reputation: 2162
Absolutely. Absolutely.

Thought it was common knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 07:34 AM
 
3,866 posts, read 4,280,054 times
Reputation: 4532
I am from ENC....definitely the "Deep South" culturally. One caveat though versus true "deep south" states, there is a significant connection to the mid-atlantic/northeast (I-95) given the proximity, it is especially apparent in the African American community as a result of the great migration and family ties. One summer in Brooklyn, Philly or DC with relatives....you'd swear to God everybody thought they were born and raised there. And the ties between Northeastern NC and Tidewater area are just as strong. That said, in my opinion, there is a slight cultural separation between "down" east NC and parts of eastern NC closer to Tidewater area. Both are ag-based environments but downeast NC through eastern SC is definitely ag-based throw back deep south as it gets.

As you can tell, I still adore that area from Grenville, Kinston, New Bern, Jacksonville down through Whiteville, Burgaw, to the Pee Dee River, Florence, Conway, etc...coastal plains.....some of the best southern food you'll find anywhere.

Last edited by Big Aristotle; 07-14-2018 at 07:50 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Research Triangle Area, NC
6,380 posts, read 5,498,068 times
Reputation: 10041
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozmoe571 View Post
Oh, please! Putting out a false opinion like this without any facts to support it only shows how wrong you are. The most recent U.S. Census data continues to show that Orange and Durham counties have continued to grow their population this decade and have some of the strongest growth rates in the state despite your "deep gloom" claim. Durham is the sixth most populated county with a growth rate of 13 percent, not far behind Mecklenburg and Wake's strong growth rates. And Orange is ready to pass Randolph County for 20th most populated in the state, needing only fewer than 500 new residents to do so as it grows 6 percent versus Randolph's anemic less than 1 percent. (Source: http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-counties/nc/)

Meanwhile, most of Eastern North Carolina's growth has been stagnant or declining this decade, with several losing thousands of residents. Look at Lenoir County (59,495 in 2010 vs. 56,883 in 2017), Bertie (21,282 in 2010 vs. 19,224 in 2017), Northampton (22,099 in 2010 vs. 19,862 in 2017), Halifax (54,691 in 2010 vs. 51,310 in 2017) and Edgecombe (56,552 in 2010 vs. 52,747 in 2017) as examples. (Source: https://www.cleveland.com/datacentra...nationall.html)

You may have a "deep gloom" about how well the progressive politics are faring in Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Durham, but you're ignoring the reality that businesses and population are booming there, especially compared to eastern NC. The "anti-business" mindset you claim is somehow bringing in new business construction to these downtowns that most other municipalities in eastern NC would kill to have, and plans for improving regional transit make both areas look even more promising. You have a diversified economy in the cities with education, health, research and other sectors going strong. At the same time, housing prices keep rising as many people flock to the cities with their fine assortment of parks, cultural attractions, artistic events and other amenities you'd be hard pressed to find in much of Eastern North Carolina.

Sorry if you don't like Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Durham. But don't claim they're "constraining freedom" and anti-business when the truth shows it is the opposite. I do think it's unfair to compare it with Eastern North Carolina, which has its own set of challenges as do other areas that I would agree comprise part of the "Deep South." But you shouldn't denigrate a successful part of the state when discussing this topic at hand, unless you want to weaken your argument.
Hey now....don't you go using logic and facts to nullify Backwoods' rambling nonsensical rant!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 10:02 AM
 
873 posts, read 1,017,487 times
Reputation: 1903
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarHeelNick View Post
Hey now....don't you go using logic and facts to nullify Backwoods' rambling nonsensical rant!
Ha ha ha! My apologies for bringing that into the discussion. Thanks for the clarification!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 12:57 PM
 
Location: North Caroline
467 posts, read 428,243 times
Reputation: 813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
If you consider all of Georgia as the Deep South then sure, but this ignores the fundamental differences between the coastal plain South, which was heavily reliant on agriculture and thus slave labor, and the Piedmont/Appalachia which was mostly characterized by poor Scots-Irish farming families with very little in the way of large-scale agriculture. Atlanta's origins comprise another narrative altogether as it was founded by the state of Georgia as an economic venture, namely, a rail hub. It never had many slaves to begin with and after it was burned during the Civil War, it quickly turned to a more industrial-based economy in light of the postbellum "New South" economic model championed by Henry Lee Grady.

In a broad sense Atlanta can be called the Deep South; being situated in the Piedmont, it became a critical commercial hub linking the cotton-producing coastal plain region not just with the Upper South but with large Midwestern markets, and it also attracted African Americans going all the way back to Reconstruction and the early 20th century. But in a strict physiographic and historical sense, Atlanta lies outside of the Deep South.
I think this is a great perspective on Atlanta's position as a Piedmont city within Georgia, a predominantly Deep South state. It would be hard to claim that Atlanta is not influenced by the Deep South, but I think its primary identity is derived from historically being a rail and logistical hub as Mutiny mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 02:54 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,679 posts, read 2,903,386 times
Reputation: 2162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Aristotle View Post
I am from ENC....definitely the "Deep South" culturally. One caveat though versus true "deep south" states, there is a significant connection to the mid-atlantic/northeast (I-95) given the proximity, it is especially apparent in the African American community as a result of the great migration and family ties. One summer in Brooklyn, Philly or DC with relatives....you'd swear to God everybody thought they were born and raised there. And the ties between Northeastern NC and Tidewater area are just as strong. That said, in my opinion, there is a slight cultural separation between "down" east NC and parts of eastern NC closer to Tidewater area. Both are ag-based environments but downeast NC through eastern SC is definitely ag-based throw back deep south as it gets.

As you can tell, I still adore that area from Grenville, Kinston, New Bern, Jacksonville down through Whiteville, Burgaw, to the Pee Dee River, Florence, Conway, etc...coastal plains.....some of the best southern food you'll find anywhere.
Good post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2018, 10:03 PM
 
2,844 posts, read 2,978,513 times
Reputation: 3529
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarHeelTerritory View Post
I think this is a great perspective on Atlanta's position as a Piedmont city within Georgia, a predominantly Deep South state. It would be hard to claim that Atlanta is not influenced by the Deep South, but I think its primary identity is derived from historically being a rail and logistical hub as Mutiny mentioned.
its a long comment that just boiled down to "didnt have farms"

it was important in the civil war for the confederacy

sherman razed it

it had slaves

what else do you want for deep south
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top