Courtesy of a newspaper that is so subjective in terms of gentrification that it has been labeling Ridgewood a hotspot for young professionals since 1985...
IF YOU'RE THINKING OF LIVING IN RIDGEWOOD - NYTimes.com
"But the recent designation of parts of this blue-collar neighborhood in Queens as a Federal historic district is prompting changes. Tenants are buying their own homes and young professionals are moving into the community."
And Bushwick itself has been spoken about as a new hotspot for hipsters/and artists since the late 90s even when there population might have been 5-10 people...
CHeck out this article:
Close-Up On: Ridgewood, Queens - Page 1 - NYC Life - New York - Village Voice
It already concedes to the fact that Bushwick and Williamsburg had been taken over by hipsters by 2002!!! These are the articles that you look for and that as I've mentioned previously cannot be trusted since they come from subjective sources that have agendas and motives clear as day...
You probably wait for the next article to come out about Bushwick hand and foot to post on here and continue your agenda... it's really ridiculous and the fact that you feel the need to do so, kinda speaks volumes about how you really feel about the neighborhood... You don't see people in Williamsburg, or Park Slope, LES, Astoria, LIC, posting constant articles (from the TIMES no less... lol) to convince people of what is occuring... Because the reality is that it has occured over there where significant progress has been made...
You, on the other hand are obsessed with creating this hype that most hipsters that move here realize as soon as they move in here... it is what it is... just hype... If we use the same statistics to judge all the other neighborhoods in the city we'd believe that Brownsville, Mott Haven, Morrisania, East New York, etc. then are all areas that are experiencing the same gentrification that Bushwick is experiencing cause they have the same numbers... the same drop-offs in crime... the same passing rates, etc.
What's the reality? Times are not as dangerous nowadays... We know that... That's why 7 billion on this earth are selling their souls to try and live in this city... However, that being said, what's the reality among these neighborhoods that have had a significant drop off in crime since the 90s... they are still crime-plagued and for most of these areas that have been spoken about as hot spots for hipsters/artists, they have seen a surge in the overall crime rate and/or murder rate... Areas like South Williamsburg (90th precinct), Bushwick (83rd precinct)... Mott Haven (40th precinct) a little ridiculous for me giving the statistics but I just go by what the times reports since it is so factual
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://pics3.city-data.com/forum/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
have all had increased either in violent crime or overall crime... These neighborhoods are not any better than they were five years ago... they remain high-crime dangerous areas to live in for everyone and not just the Black youth though unfortunately they are the biggest targets... Fact is, the only reason why the crime numbers affecting the hipsters was so low, was because their numbers weren't all that large in any of these neighborhoods... Doesn't mean they weren't getting targetted at the same rate as anyone else... If Black and Hispanic folk are 90% of the population and hipsters are 10%... who do you think is gonna show up more as being a victim of crime...
Look, once again, I am not against anyone moving anywhere but as someone looking from the outside, in, without any agendas or real estate motivations, it is really annoying to see all these articles promoting areas that people know are dangerous and yet without any hesitation or research choose to move here solely based on the hype promoted by articles that by no means are objective...