New Jersey Picture Thread (Morristown, Sussex: town, near, farm)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
not here in burlington county!! More farms then any county in NJ
Well thats good to hear, but here every patch of grass MUST be built on! I like to see progression too but when it becomes too much it's not good. Of course we can ONLY build on what has never been built upon, yet can't go back to renovate the old that has been ruined. Why is that? Old towns need to get built back to liveable again, leave the areas that are untouched, untouched.
.....while humans consume all the resources wherever they are and then move on. ...
Well thats good to hear, but here every patch of grass MUST be built on! I like to see progression too but when it becomes too much it's not good. Of course we can ONLY build on what has never been built upon, yet can't go back to renovate the old that has been ruined. Why is that? Old towns need to get built back to liveable again, leave the areas that are untouched, untouched.
.....while humans consume all the resources wherever they are and then move on. ...
Location: Splitting time between Dayton, NJ and Needmore, PA
1,184 posts, read 4,047,792 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjd72
Of course we can ONLY build on what has never been built upon, yet can't go back to renovate the old that has been ruined. Why is that? Old towns need to get built back to liveable again, leave the areas that are untouched, untouched.
I'd love to see rehabilitation of the old, tired parts of the state too. The "problem" is there are so many steps that need to be taken by a developer which require upfront outlays that it becomes cost prohibitive with no guarantee they will be able to make even a small profit. Thus, it's always going to be easier for the developer to use undeveloped land then to go into established locations and take all the necessary steps to reclaim the property.
While most of these areas could be bulldozed rather quickly, keep in mind the fact that many of the structures still have people living in them. That means developers would have to do at least a title search to confirm there are no liens on the property and then an assessment of each house to determine "fair market value." Here the issue is, how can the developer square up paying fair market value for something they are going to bulldoze to make way for new.
Also, keep in mind that some of the houses and buildings that appear to be old and run down may be designated historical. This means the developer then needs to work closely with historians and architects to restore the facades to their original form, generally speaking. Inside, they can do what they want as long as they meet the UCC for the scope of work being done.
To keep this a photograph thread, here are several photos I took of the Hoagland-Clark House here in South Brunswick. It dates from the 1770's. Currently it is on the Preservation New Jersey's Top 10 Endangered Historic Sites. Surrounding it are 1970's-esque split level homes that were built on the farmland in the area. Personally, I'm glad this one is being saved and that the new owner is going to restore it to its original beauty.
I'm going to start shooting some jersey pics to upload. i've always fancied the old churches in New Jersey!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.