Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-24-2022, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Needham, MA
8,545 posts, read 14,025,464 times
Reputation: 7939

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
I remember about 10 or so years ago it was appealing to buy a bigger home in a far out place because the home was cheaper. Billerica and other north shore towns come to mind. Traffic wasn't as horrific as it was 10 years ago as it is today so people with families seemed more willing to make the long commute to have a nice big home that they didn't break the bank for. Today there doesn't seem to be a whole lot appealing about paying 1.3+ million for a big home with a 1.5 hour commute. Might as well buy a smaller home closer to the city with a less soul crushing commute.

But maybe hybrid and WFH is still making these kind of homes attractive?
If anything buying further out to get a bigger home on a bigger piece of property has become wildly popular over the last couple of years much more so than it would have been 10 years ago. This is because of two things . . .

1. The new prevalence of WFH. Most people don't have to commute in 5 days/week anymore. Many people don't go into the office at all anymore. So, commuting has become less of a factor in some people's buying decision.

2. After being stuck inside of our houses for a year, many people decide that they wanted to be better able to entertain themselves at home or that they needed more space in their house because they now WFH. Maybe they wanted space for a home office. Maybe they wanted a bigger backyard for a pool. Perhaps, they decided they wanted their house to have a home theater or a home gym or an outdoor kitchen or a big patio with a firepit and an outdoor TV and a bar.

COVID definitely changed the way people live and therefore changed what they're looking for in a home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-24-2022, 09:42 AM
 
16,395 posts, read 8,198,277 times
Reputation: 11378
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePRU View Post
If anything buying further out to get a bigger home on a bigger piece of property has become wildly popular over the last couple of years much more so than it would have been 10 years ago. This is because of two things . . .

1. The new prevalence of WFH. Most people don't have to commute in 5 days/week anymore. Many people don't go into the office at all anymore. So, commuting has become less of a factor in some people's buying decision.

2. After being stuck inside of our houses for a year, many people decide that they wanted to be better able to entertain themselves at home or that they needed more space in their house because they now WFH. Maybe they wanted space for a home office. Maybe they wanted a bigger backyard for a pool. Perhaps, they decided they wanted their house to have a home theater or a home gym or an outdoor kitchen or a big patio with a firepit and an outdoor TV and a bar.

COVID definitely changed the way people live and therefore changed what they're looking for in a home.
I would have thought this as well...you're a real estate agent and I'm not so i'm sure you have more of an idea. I guess I thought I'd see MORE people moving out of suburbs close to the city but I'm not seeing that. They are still paying way more than I ever would have thought for small homes with a not so bad commute. I guess MA is just very popular in general...whether it be a big home in the sticks or a smaller home not so much in the sticks. The suburbs close to Boston are just out of reach for many regardless of home size.

I know I have heard home buyers complain about the price increase of homes in 'the sticks'. I've even seen it discussed on this forum in that people are disappointed in how much prices have gone up in places like Foxboro, Hanover, Medway etc. I guess what I'm saying is people used to look to certain towns for 'deals' on a nice family home that wasn't too too far from the city but those deals are now gone for most people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 10:30 AM
 
849 posts, read 554,706 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonMike7 View Post
Has Billerica really come around? I spend some time there and always got the feel it was sort of a townie town. It was always dubbed "Somerville with trees", except Somerville eventually gentrified. Nutting Lake area still doesn't have a great rep and if you go off the beaten path into some of those neighborhoods, there are still a lot of distressed looking properties with a car or two on blocks in the yard. Is it really turning around?

I did work in the area for 10+ years and always felt if i needed to live in the area, I would choose Burlington or even Tewksbury over living in the 'rica. However as someone who did put an offer in Tewksbury over 10+ years ago, i'm glad it didn't get accepted. Tewksbury seems to have gone from a quiet town into having a ton of development, especially along Rt 38. Traffic through town at commute times can be miserable.
Billerica is a big town with 41k residents. There is a relatively big diversity in terms of income and social status. (However, the racial diversity is still low.)
From North Billerica to Pinehurst is quite some distance (by New England standard) and there are very different types of neighborhoods in between.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 10:52 AM
 
2,066 posts, read 1,073,498 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtPleasantDream View Post
Billerica is a big town with 41k residents. There is a relatively big diversity in terms of income and social status. (However, the racial diversity is still low.)
From North Billerica to Pinehurst is quite some distance (by New England standard) and there are very different types of neighborhoods in between.
I heard Brockton and Lawrence are great if racial diversity is an absolute must have...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 11:13 AM
 
849 posts, read 554,706 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestieWhitie View Post
I heard Brockton and Lawrence are great if racial diversity is an absolute must have...
Lawrence is 80% Hispanic, so it is as low as Billerica.

Lexington has a very high racial diversity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 11:33 AM
 
145 posts, read 189,347 times
Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by msRB311 View Post
I would have thought this as well...you're a real estate agent and I'm not so i'm sure you have more of an idea. I guess I thought I'd see MORE people moving out of suburbs close to the city but I'm not seeing that. They are still paying way more than I ever would have thought for small homes with a not so bad commute. I guess MA is just very popular in general...whether it be a big home in the sticks or a smaller home not so much in the sticks. The suburbs close to Boston are just out of reach for many regardless of home size.

I know I have heard home buyers complain about the price increase of homes in 'the sticks'. I've even seen it discussed on this forum in that people are disappointed in how much prices have gone up in places like Foxboro, Hanover, Medway etc. I guess what I'm saying is people used to look to certain towns for 'deals' on a nice family home that wasn't too too far from the city but those deals are now gone for most people.
I was gonna say, despite the rise of WFH, it looks to me like prices have shot up even more in towns with close proximity to Boston and Cambridge. Prices in Cambridge itself – even rougher parts like Central Square – and Somerville, not to mention Watertown, Waltham, Medford, Melrose. I haven't run any broad analysis but just my impression from keeping an eye on the market. And of course the top tier suburbs with good proximity like Brookline, Newton, Belmont, Arlington, Winchester, and Lexington also continue to get even more insane.

Last edited by thinkingotherthings; 10-24-2022 at 11:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 11:49 AM
 
16,395 posts, read 8,198,277 times
Reputation: 11378
Default re

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkingotherthings View Post
I was gonna say, despite the rise of WFH, it looks to me like prices have shot up even more in towns with close proximity to Boston and Cambridge. Prices in Cambridge itself – even rougher parts like Central Square – and Somerville, not to mention Watertown, Waltham, Medford, Melrose. I haven't run any broad analysis but just my impression from keeping an eye on the market.
Yeah. I think the problem is that traffic is just so horrific that even people who only commute in twice a week still don't want to have to deal with it. I think at one point people thought they could stomach the bad commute if it was less than 5 days a week but maybe not. Dealing with it once a week can be that bad for some people. It's really sad how much traffic seems to drive the real estate market but it does. Taking the train is no better. These are all reasons why I would have thought there'd be more of a push for WFH to continue...but seems like hybrid is where it's at. And of course there are people who can't WFH at all and never could.

The real estate market just blows in this area. People pay insane amounts for the 'burbs close to Boston but it's not like you get a much better deal moving further out. You still are going to pay a lot and get a crappy commute.

I am fortunate to not to be looking and probably never will again lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 11:56 AM
 
Location: Suburban Boston Lifer
181 posts, read 124,568 times
Reputation: 124
socioeconomic diversity is true diversity.

racial diversity in lexington without socioeconomic diversity is not true diversity.

it is what it is
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 12:01 PM
 
849 posts, read 554,706 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by bricka View Post
socioeconomic diversity is true diversity.

racial diversity in lexington without socioeconomic diversity is not true diversity.

it is what it is
yes, and that is why I used "racial diversity" to begin with .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2022, 12:02 PM
 
2,066 posts, read 1,073,498 times
Reputation: 1681
Quote:
Originally Posted by bricka View Post
socioeconomic diversity is true diversity.

racial diversity in lexington without socioeconomic diversity is not true diversity.

it is what it is
Let's be honest though, seven figure buyers who go out of their way signaling their virtue are definitely not looking for socioeconomic diversity. They might want a black neighbor but that neighbor must have a PhD and a million or three in the bank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top