Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2015, 03:14 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
3,681 posts, read 9,883,096 times
Reputation: 3016

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by airics View Post
savings 65 a month… i paid a hair under a grand installed so… 65x12= 780 saved AND
i took my single speed pump and put it on craigslist and got $175 in a day.. so.. 965. in a year..
Most people don't run their pump as long in the winter as in the summer. Same is true for the cooler months of spring and fall. Less run time equals less savings. Two to three years is correct for most people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2015, 09:32 AM
 
15,883 posts, read 14,564,333 times
Reputation: 12009
You're going way farther than I was. I was just responding to Airics' statement about wanting to run his AC off of solar. I just wanted the metrics on that. The answer seems to be that with a biggish PV system, at peak solar output, it comes close, but doesn't quite make it. Off peak the gap is greater. And, of course, at night, the PV is useless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
It is actually more complicated than all that. Los Angeles claims that incremental KWHs at peak times are worth $0.45 each. If so then adding 5KWs is worth around $2.25 an hour at peak times. So 4 hours a day at peak times you get $270 per month during the high summer. And that is on top of a smaller payment the rest of the time.

But that argument has a hole in it as well. Solar PV does not peak when energy usage does but a few hours before. So solar is down substantially when the demand peaks.

So in the southwest household solar is good for offsetting some, though not all, of the peak engineer need. And there is going to need to be a complex calculation of what that power is actually worth. I would in fact expect litigation or legislation.

Further complicating things is the homeowner commits when he opts to install PV solar. And there are a whole range of outcomes. If you jump early you may make money but a lot less than if you jump later driven by the efficiency and cost of the installation. Complicating further the tax credit drops heavily at the end of 2016 and may well not be extended with the presently hostile Congress. it could however come charging back if the Congress changes in 2016.

At this point it would appear reasonable to wait and jump in during 2016. Take advantage of both another year of progress and the tax credit. If not then you wait until 2017 if the tax credit is reinstated or perhaps 2020 or 2021 if it is not.

And you consider all the good advice from Scoop et al to drive energy usage down...which is cheaper and more cost effective than the arrays.

So not now. Maybe next year. If not another year or two...or five or six depending on how the politics and technology runs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2015, 09:46 AM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,850,283 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
You're going way farther than I was. I was just responding to Airics' statement about wanting to run his AC off of solar. I just wanted the metrics on that. The answer seems to be that with a biggish PV system, at peak solar output, it comes close, but doesn't quite make it. Off peak the gap is greater. And, of course, at night, the PV is useless.
Wrong model. Basically you exchange the power you generate to the utility for an equal amount. So even if your system cannot hold the required peak to support your home you can still end up with a zero power bill by supplying power to the utility at non peak times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Nevada > Las Vegas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top