Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2016, 05:53 AM
 
54 posts, read 57,127 times
Reputation: 112

Advertisements

I was looking at a chart of the results of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Average. Most years it reached a new high. I could just hear the financial media complaining that the stock market at that date was too high and complain that there was no reason why stocks were doing so well. People listened, bailed out and tried to get back in at the bottom. (Most missed it). Then after a correction, the market again reached new high and the financial media raised the alarm and said that the stock market could not hold these record highs.

This was happening in the 1970s, 80s, 90s, 00s, and today. Why do people keep listening to this noise? The over all trend in the stock market is always up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2016, 06:13 AM
 
8,005 posts, read 7,291,119 times
Reputation: 18180
Oh, boy. Now you've done it. We have an entire bitter culture here who have been predicting/wishing that the up trend reverses forever so they can hide in a house built of high interest rate CDs and fortified with precious metals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 07:53 AM
 
107,307 posts, read 109,675,104 times
Reputation: 80681
the last 2 quarters had very good earnings reports .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
2,914 posts, read 2,702,351 times
Reputation: 2450
Quote:
Every time the stock market reaches a new high, the pundits say it is too expensive
Market Watch has stock market doom and gloom articles posted on a weekly basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2016, 09:23 AM
 
107,307 posts, read 109,675,104 times
Reputation: 80681
i rarely see a day without some gloom on market watch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2016, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,145 posts, read 7,637,039 times
Reputation: 9937
OP can listen to me.
I avoid giving advice.
that's my advice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2016, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Florida
6,660 posts, read 7,406,310 times
Reputation: 8225
I think you have it wrong. The market does what ever it does for the day. Then the media reach into their basket of explanations (only one basket, not one for lows and one for highs) and pull out today's explanation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2016, 06:32 PM
 
919 posts, read 852,506 times
Reputation: 1071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money Guru View Post
I was looking at a chart of the results of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Average. Most years it reached a new high. I could just hear the financial media complaining that the stock market at that date was too high and complain that there was no reason why stocks were doing so well. People listened, bailed out and tried to get back in at the bottom. (Most missed it). Then after a correction, the market again reached new high and the financial media raised the alarm and said that the stock market could not hold these record highs.

This was happening in the 1970s, 80s, 90s, 00s, and today. Why do people keep listening to this noise? The over all trend in the stock market is always up.
There are two groups of people who are worried about the market hitting new highs.

The dumb group just sees new highs being made almost every day and panics thinking this can't go on. Of course it can, if the fundamentals like earnings, and macro events (e.g. no major terrorist incidents) are OK.

The smart group is worried because irrespective of the absolute level, the market IS overvalued based on metrics like the Shiller CAPE ratio (even after adjusting for various factors.) They are right. But what does that predict? That there could be a sharp brief correction, or stocks could wander around not making much money over the years, or growth could take off again making valuations reasonable. Who knows!

Keep in mind S&P is at something like 25x and earnings have been declining. So even ignoring all the financial media, it is not a bad idea to have a little bit of cash on the sidelines, just in case.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 06:18 AM
 
54 posts, read 57,127 times
Reputation: 112
In late 2012 and early 2013 the PE Ratio was also high and the market started moving up into what became a huge bull market. If you got bogged down with the outdated idea what the PE Ratio should be in late 2012, you would have lost the 40% increase in the stock market from 2012 to today. How is it any different today than early 2013 when the market was at an all time high?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 01:14 PM
 
919 posts, read 852,506 times
Reputation: 1071
Quote:
Originally Posted by Money Guru View Post
In late 2012 and early 2013 the PE Ratio was also high and the market started moving up into what became a huge bull market. If you got bogged down with the outdated idea what the PE Ratio should be in late 2012, you would have lost the 40% increase in the stock market from 2012 to today. How is it any different today than early 2013 when the market was at an all time high?
PE ratio is an indicator, not a predictor. I clearly said we don't know what the market will do. So one example of 2012-2013 to now proves nothing.

P/E reached 50 in 1999. You could argue with me the same thing if I said in 1998 that the market was overvalued. Bubbles can keep expanding for a long time. Nonetheless, you'd have been better off not investing in the 1999 market.

In the end, difference of opinion is what makes horse racing. And a stock market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top