Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2013, 06:55 PM
 
6,908 posts, read 7,676,971 times
Reputation: 2595

Advertisements

Which one will have the arena first?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2013, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Northern California
979 posts, read 2,096,247 times
Reputation: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
No.... just.... no.

They have enough trouble trying to keep the Kings. Sacramento is a one-town team.
That may be the case but Sacramento holds two of the NBA's longest sellout streaks in history. It wasn't until the Maloofs began to stick it to the city and its fans by running the team poorly, sabotaging the arena deal that they initially agreed with. You can't blame the fans for not turning out. The Kings have a dedicated fan base in Sacramento. With new owners and a winning product, fans will return.

Unfortunately, the team has been sold to a Seattle group by the Maloofs. So this may will be the last season of professional basketball. If the Kings leave, who is to say Sacramento can't support a NHL team?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 11:23 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,925,693 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistola916 View Post

Unfortunately, the team has been sold to a Seattle group by the Maloofs. So this may will be the last season of professional basketball. If the Kings leave, who is to say Sacramento can't support a NHL team?
Because there's Quebec, Seattle, Toronto (2nd), Kansas City, Portland, Houston, Hartford, Hamilton, Milwaukee, and ... probably Atlanta again? Although I seriously doubt the last one, Sacramento would have to get in line regardless of whether or not they could support a hockey team, which personally I NEVER see happening as long as San Jose is there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 10:21 AM
 
127 posts, read 192,666 times
Reputation: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetsNHL View Post
Which one will have the arena first?
KC is built. QC will be built before Seattle. However, they will be looking for the long-term fit. Key Arena and the Colisee are both suitable as temporary arenas. The Colisee is a better hockey building and with the shorter wait time to the new arena opening, this would present the easier transition. Seattle has a higher risk/reward and would probably be better suited to expansion (though it could definitely prove tempting for a relocation).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 10:26 AM
 
127 posts, read 192,666 times
Reputation: 107
Sacramento doesn't deserve to lose the Kings. That was a great market for a long time, but that market doesn't fit the NHL. Maybe a very small notch ahead of Louisville in terms of hockey culture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,406 posts, read 8,998,042 times
Reputation: 8507
This thread can be pretty amusing. Lots of assumptions, generalizations and baseless comments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Northern California
979 posts, read 2,096,247 times
Reputation: 765
Quote:
Originally Posted by wherespankakehouse? View Post
Sacramento doesn't deserve to lose the Kings. That was a great market for a long time, but that market doesn't fit the NHL. Maybe a very small notch ahead of Louisville in terms of hockey culture.
Yes, because Phoenix, Atlanta, Tampa, Florida (Panthers) are hockey heavyweights.

Honestly, the NHL should put teams in cold weather cities. I can see Seattle and/or Portland being a great hockey market. Even Salt Lake City, but they may not have the population to support two professional franchises.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2013, 05:44 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,925,693 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistola916 View Post
Yes, because Phoenix, Atlanta, Tampa, Florida (Panthers) are hockey heavyweights.

Honestly, the NHL should put teams in cold weather cities. I can see Seattle and/or Portland being a great hockey market. Even Salt Lake City, but they may not have the population to support two professional franchises.
Let's not start with this again....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 08:57 AM
 
127 posts, read 192,666 times
Reputation: 107
Quote:
Originally Posted by pistola916 View Post
Yes, because Phoenix, Atlanta, Tampa, Florida (Panthers) are hockey heavyweights.

All of these cities, including Dallas, San Jose, and even Raleigh and Nashville offered considerable upside compared to what Sacramento would bring with a team already in San Jose. The average NBA ticket price is $51 to the NHL's $61. As far as I can tell, there is not so much as a CHL or ECHL team based in Sacramento. Yes, it could happen if a billionaire looking for a hobby wants to take up the cause. But there are clearly a half dozen better options to any ownership group looking to make profit.

I think the AHL could benefit from a greater western base of teams and I think Sac-town would be a nice fit. As an NBA market, they supported the Kings through years of futility. Such markets should be in high demand for a handful of NBA teams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2013, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,343,933 times
Reputation: 5480
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJG View Post
No, Seattle IS seeking a team.

It's part of a plan to get NHL along with the Sacramento Kings.
It would be Great for Vancouver to have a PNW Rival with Seattle plus under a 3 hour drive to either city so it means fans of both teams could make it and Vancouver fans would go to watch what ever team Seattle gets and if you get a team we (Vancouver fans ) will come down to games and support your team
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Hockey

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top