Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2008, 04:00 AM
 
19 posts, read 39,143 times
Reputation: 39

Advertisements

What do you think? I think the assassination was planned out by a murkey underground of right wing anti-Castro Cubans and their supporters although I can't prove it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2008, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,792,931 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOB_DARLING View Post
What do you think? I think the assassination was planned out by a murkey underground of right wing anti-Castro Cubans and their supporters although I can't prove it.

Oswald did it by himself and for his own screwball reasons. Read "Case Closed".

The simplest explanations are generally the valid ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2008, 11:16 AM
 
14,994 posts, read 23,935,215 times
Reputation: 26540
I say no and have never seen any valid evidence to conclude likewise. All the grassy knoll, magic bullet, sound recordings, etc counter-theories and counter-evidence have been explained and dismissed except to the hardcore consipracy guys and to those that simply do not know better.

It's like the 9/11 conspiracy theorists - there is some kind of pychological need in people to explain an otherwise senseless act with complex theories, as if to justify it with an important all-consuming act that can offer some kind of closure and satisfaction and comfort to people.

The truth is just too simple and senseless to people - a phycologically disturbed ex-marine (where he was a qualified marksman) with ambigous and confused personal political agendas took out a president from a raised position with a bolt-action rifle.

Last edited by Dd714; 09-01-2008 at 11:27 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2008, 11:18 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,286 posts, read 87,533,280 times
Reputation: 55564
when democrats rise up strange things happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2008, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Iowa
3,320 posts, read 4,140,557 times
Reputation: 4617
I like the theory where LBJ, J Edgar Hoover, Nixon and others had a meeting in Dallas the night before and arranged the whole thing. I dont believe it, but it was good entertainment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2008, 12:21 PM
 
78,642 posts, read 60,823,449 times
Reputation: 49960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huckleberry3911948 View Post
when democrats rise up strange things happen.
So you are saying JFK is a zombie?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2008, 12:31 PM
 
9,618 posts, read 27,376,444 times
Reputation: 5382
I don't know how vast the conspiracy was, but I still don't think Oswald acted alone, nor do I think Jack Ruby shot Oswald out of "patriotism".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,645,871 times
Reputation: 10622
There is absolutely no way that Oswald, who failed his marksmanship test on more than one occasion when he joined the Marines, could possibly have a) made a pinpoint shot at a moving vehicle, and b) been standing downstairs at street level no more than two minutes later.

Also, there is a regulation that a President's limo must be moving at a certain speed. Kennedy's was not. The whole thing was a setup, and when Oswald said (on television) that he was only a patsy, he was telling the truth.

John Kennedy had come to the conclusion that our involvement in Vietnam was an unholy mess, and he had resolved to do something about getting us out of there. For this, certain special interests wanted him out of the way. (For that matter, Kennedy had been asserting himself more and more as his term went on--he was no longer the inexperienced rookie by 1963. A horrible loss for our country, that he didn't get a chance to run for another term in 1964).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,792,931 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred314X View Post
There is absolutely no way that Oswald, who failed his marksmanship test on more than one occasion when he joined the Marines, could possibly have a) made a pinpoint shot at a moving vehicle, and b) been standing downstairs at street level no more than two minutes later.

Also, there is a regulation that a President's limo must be moving at a certain speed. Kennedy's was not. The whole thing was a setup, and when Oswald said (on television) that he was only a patsy, he was telling the truth.

John Kennedy had come to the conclusion that our involvement in Vietnam was an unholy mess, and he had resolved to do something about getting us out of there. For this, certain special interests wanted him out of the way. (For that matter, Kennedy had been asserting himself more and more as his term went on--he was no longer the inexperienced rookie by 1963. A horrible loss for our country, that he didn't get a chance to run for another term in 1964).

Oswald was a proficient marksman. And the shots were easy anyway.

There are so many lies about this that have become "common knowledge" that reasonable discussion is difficult. If you haven't read "Case Closed" then you can't talk about this with credibility.

I'd like to know who the "interests" were that would kill a president to keep a minor war going.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2008, 03:51 PM
 
9,618 posts, read 27,376,444 times
Reputation: 5382
I read " Case Closed" and it was well written but didn't convince me.
I don't think Vietnam had anything to do with JFK's murder. Something more along the lines of rogue CIA with Mafia...JFK was elected with heavy mob support, particularly Sam Giancana, and it was well known that they were exceedingly angry after he turned on them and went after them via his brother Bobby the Attorney General.
Sure, Oswald was capable. I just don't see him as having the motivation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top