Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Wuhan lab does not make vaccines. "Big Pharma" does not create viruses.
Your pedanticness is to be expected as a resulting of the complacency conditioned into the general population by big pharma, their willing politicians and a compliant media.
All your really need to understand is that the link between the virus origins, and commercial entities tinkering with viruses to aid vaccine devolpment, are intentionally downplayed.
What should be the story of the century, has been effectively silenced by dull nobodies who aren't sharp enough to see the serious danger posed by this secretive and profit/ego driven industry, unless it's the lead story.
The mRNA vaccines do not contain the full viral genome.
Your post just demonstrates you have gone deep down the conspiracy rabbit hole.
It's no conspiracy to suggest that viral engineering is related to vaccine development.
That you would dance on a pinhead around this issue, is a sign of skillful manipulation by others..... you have literally been trained to not see danger, by an appeal to your sense of a superior intellect.
The skillful manipulators have weaponised conspiracy theories/ists, to hide obvious danger, in plain sight.
"Occam's razor is pretty easy to understand. It says that other things being equal, simpler explanations are generally better than more complex ones. It is used everyday by scientists to choose between competing theories."
That argues against complicated conspiracies.
I believe that is based on the laws of thermodynamics that involves the law of entropy.
In any natural process entropy must increase. Randomness would increase and not decrease. The more the system is the more unnatural the process is the less likely the event is to occur. Very complicated conspiracies are less likely to occur.
"Occam's razor is pretty easy to understand. It says that other things being equal, simpler explanations are generally better than more complex ones. It is used everyday by scientists to choose between competing theories."
That argues against complicated conspiracies.
I believe that is based on the laws of thermodynamics that involves the law of entropy.
In any natural process entropy must increase. Randomness would increase and not decrease. The more the system is the more unnatural the process is the less likely the event is to occur. Very complicated conspiracies are less likely to occur.
Yes. An accident is the most likely scenario, imo.
What follows is just human nature playing out, against a backdrop of commercial sensitivity.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
