Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2009, 05:21 AM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,591,550 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

Wind power has seen historic growth and the blessing of President Obama - but it's far from recession-proof.

The American Wind Energy Association reported Tuesday that the amount of electricity generated by wind turbines grew by 50 percent last year and 55 new manufacturing facilities were built to make turbine components.

Washington Times - Wind power needs federal assistance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2009, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,726,169 times
Reputation: 6745
This isn't really new news... Wind has been getting handouts since it's inception. In fact it can't support it's own existence without goverment support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2009, 07:32 AM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,439 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
This isn't really new news... Wind has been getting handouts since it's inception. In fact it can't support it's own existence without goverment support.
Not according to the artice. Just tax breaks. Name an energy industry that doesn't have those. Since this is a growth industry they may also be trying to prevent the job losses that are impending in what has up to now been a source of new jobs. Last week there were 78,000 jobs lost, by some accounts. We're hitting the steep part of the slope that started last October. What's being proposed doesn't seem that different from what's being done in many other industries.

Quote:
Congress already has provided tax breaks for wind energy, but the industry maintains those credits aren't worth much if there is no taxable income.
Lawmakers in the House are considering, instead, government grants to cover 30 percent of upfront costs of wind-energy investments. A draft Senate version has no such provision, although it would provide a 30 percent investment tax credit for renewable energy, including wind power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2009, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Washington DC
5,922 posts, read 8,065,889 times
Reputation: 954
Wow if you look at the free ride coal has on pollution, nuclear has in direct subsidies over its entire life, and include the cost of our military presence in the Middle East in the price of oil, the ~$500 million in tax credits that wind receives a year seem pretty modest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2009, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,726,169 times
Reputation: 6745
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thread killer.................evidence has proved you wrong time and time again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2009, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Harrisonville
1,843 posts, read 2,370,439 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thread killer.................evidence has proved you wrong time and time again

As if!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2009, 01:11 AM
 
3,853 posts, read 12,866,277 times
Reputation: 2529
I say cut subsidies to coal industries, make them more accountable for the mess they create. That'll drive up the price of coal so lower cost alternatives can take dominance - geothermal, wind, solar. Cheaper than unsubsidized coal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2009, 09:10 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
4,176 posts, read 10,687,536 times
Reputation: 9646
Hmph - I say, cut subsidies to EVERYONE, give me back my tax dollars to invest in the technology I choose, and let the technology stand or fail on its own. As could have happened in the ethanol craze, the marketplace, if unaltered by fanatical lobbyists and government sponsered nannyism, will fail and eliminate a poor idea - or an idea that has outlasted its viability - far more quickly and cheaply than has occurred under the superficial umbrella of fiscal protectionism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2009, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
4,530 posts, read 8,865,904 times
Reputation: 7602
I have been working on new designs for Wind Power for several years now. I DO NOT think the future of wind is going to be in huge Wind Farms that generate electricity to add to the existing ELECTRIC GRID.

When I was a kid growing up on a farm in Eastern Colorado the R.E.A (Rural Electrification Association) brought power lines to the family farm in the 1950's. Until about 1956 our family depended on a Wind Generator for electricity. Of course at that time the only thing we used electricity for was a Radio, a few light bulbs and an electric fan.

With the new battery technology we have now smaller (15 KWH) Wind Generator can pay for themselves even without tax credits etc. In some states tax credits and buybacks by utility companies can make small generators profitable. Ironically New Jersey has some of the best tax incentives for development.

One thing I would like to see is new thinking in other uses for windpower other than generating electricity. There are other ways to use that power.

GL2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2009, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Nebraska
4,176 posts, read 10,687,536 times
Reputation: 9646
Hey, Gunluvver, I'm in! Totally agree. I just wish that there was less regulation about where and how it could happen - i.e., in our state, I would love to put up turbines on my hill to power my house AND my little town - but no, I have to let them put the towers up and plug them into the grid. Sure I'd profit some (maybe - gotta think long-term here) but it wouldn't help my town AT ALL because they couldn't share in it and use it for their own progress and development! What's the point of THAT? Not to mention that the town itself is not allowed to put up their own... really stinks.

Keep working on it... I'd love to hear what you come up with!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top