Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-02-2008, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Lost in Montana *recalculating*...
19,743 posts, read 22,654,259 times
Reputation: 24902

Advertisements

Nope, not much wasted space at all (unless you coun't the open greatroom), no hallways to speak of, no enormous closets or huge bathrooms...

Very efficient design when using a woodstove though.. The family room / loft upstairs was 14x20 and was kept nice and cozy in the winter when that wood heat would rise..

I'd build it again with minor mods for sure..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-02-2008, 01:10 PM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,792,832 times
Reputation: 6677
Quote:
I'd say smaller (and smarter) is definately the way to go.
That's what I love about my little house. Its only 1500 feet on one level, but the front room and kitchen are huge for a house this size. Instead of squeezing in the maximum number of bedrooms and baths, the area was given to real "living" space which makes the house feel as big as many 3000+ square foot homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 02:18 PM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,370,975 times
Reputation: 2651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Let's assume for the moment that our hypothetical family can "live in" 1500 sq ft but, would be much happier and more comfortable in 3000 sq ft. Would you support government restrictions to require / mandate this family live in the 1500 sq ft home v building a 3000 sq ft?
Why do you keep trying to make this about the evil gummint instead of about efficiency?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 02:20 PM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,370,975 times
Reputation: 2651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
You can easily fit twice the small homes in the same land that may be sub-divided for larger homes.
Another way in which larger homes are less eco friendly - they use up the same amount of a finite resource that could be used to house more people. This forces even more land to be taken away from other uses for housing - uses that can include farming, lumber production, habitat preservation and watershed protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,254,467 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean98125 View Post
Why do you keep trying to make this about the evil gummint instead of about efficiency?
Efficiency is subjective number one.

Then, the balance between needs and wants versus efficiency
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 06:17 PM
 
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,689 posts, read 10,416,361 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean98125 View Post
Another way in which larger homes are less eco friendly - they use up the same amount of a finite resource that could be used to house more people. This forces even more land to be taken away from other uses for housing - uses that can include farming, lumber production, habitat preservation and watershed protection.
Is wood finite? hm.... last I saw trees regrow, and logging companies are required to replant once they clear an area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 06:38 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,356 posts, read 26,489,954 times
Reputation: 11350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
Is wood finite? hm.... last I saw trees regrow, and logging companies are required to replant once they clear an area.
The way I read it it sounded like he was referring to land being finite, and if less land were wasted for homes, it could be used for other purposes including timber production...

And, just to comment, while most logging companies may plant trees after cutting trees, the trees they plant frequently aren't generally what kind they cut (but rather, the cheapest they can get or fast growing trees that will be more profitable sooner). This leads to a lack of biodiversity in forests and damages habitat among other things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 06:42 PM
 
3,459 posts, read 5,792,832 times
Reputation: 6677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
Is wood finite? hm.... last I saw trees regrow, and logging companies are required to replant once they clear an area.
Nice way to try to twist his words Noahma
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 06:51 PM
 
Location: Northglenn, Colorado
3,689 posts, read 10,416,361 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlinggirl View Post
Nice way to try to twist his words Noahma
I did not twist his words, just answered quickly and did not read fully. I am not worried about running out of land anytime soon. I have driven to almost every corner of our country, and there is Plenty of land.


(I am quickly trying to get our House ready for 37 people to celebrate America)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-03-2008, 07:00 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,356 posts, read 26,489,954 times
Reputation: 11350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahma View Post
I did not twist his words, just answered quickly and did not read fully. I am not worried about running out of land anytime soon. I have driven to almost every corner of our country, and there is Plenty of land.


(I am quickly trying to get our House ready for 37 people to celebrate America)
We are already a net importer of food and our population could double in the next century. A fairly large portion of land, particularly in many Western states, is government held/public land. Land is certainly a finite resource. With each new development, frequently land that could be farmed or used to preserve wildlife/plants/etc. is lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top