Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: No Polls
NA 0 0%
NA 0 0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2016, 03:59 PM
 
28,682 posts, read 18,816,352 times
Reputation: 30998

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
So are you suggesting if Africans, especially black Africans (don't forget, there is that whole part north of the Sahara which also has Africans) came over voluntarily, that then there would be no problem assimilating and not worry about 'identity'?

I wonder oppressed people like the Jews were able to keep their identity over 1000's of years? Pogroms, inquisitions, forced ghettos, etc, yet somehow although their past was destroyed many, many times, they kept their traditions, and verbal history.

Don't tell me that black slaves had it more difficult than Jews. Why was there not an oral history kept? The slave owners did not have to know about that.
Except in Spain for a time, there was no particular effort to remove Judaism from Jews. Kill Jews, yes. Remove their Jewishness and make them something else, no.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2016, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,121 posts, read 41,309,818 times
Reputation: 45198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph_Kirk View Post
As I said earlier:

The groups of Africans transferred to the Americas, held as slaves or freed at some point after slavery, whose ancestors lived in a Jim Crow social oppression for another century after that, have come to form a fairly distinct people-group with a culture an heritage that is not the same as other Americans and is at least as distinctive as the difference between Mexicans and Spaniards.

That's not merely a variation in skin color.
True that.

Pike County, OH: As Black as We Wish to Be - State of the Re:Union
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 04:42 PM
 
Location: California
1,191 posts, read 1,585,764 times
Reputation: 1775
The question its self is problematic. In the 80's when the term came about "African American" was term coined by Jesse Jackson to match the new American multi-cultural push of the time. It replaced Black, which itself had replaced Negro. However, the meaning of African American has changed over the years. And that is because the context has changed. Our society is global now.

Against this backdrop the term African American now describes an ethnic group. It refers to the people of African decent who come from the United States. Why the change? Because Jamaicans, Nigerians, and people from many other countries are also Black. But they want to be recognized for their own uniqueness. Personally, I don't get to caught up in either term. But I can see where both have their unique contexts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 04:53 PM
Status: "119 N/A" (set 29 days ago)
 
12,964 posts, read 13,689,434 times
Reputation: 9695
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
And amazingly, it that was only 40 years after women got the right to vote. Black males had that right decades before a female of any color of skin. Yet no one says what you did about blacks of women.
It was 1964 (100 years after slavery ended) when my father was legally able to sit down and eat a baloney sandwich in the break room beside a white man. Voting could still get a black person fired or killed in those days in some parts of America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 06:13 PM
 
28,682 posts, read 18,816,352 times
Reputation: 30998
Quote:
Originally Posted by thriftylefty View Post
It was 1964 (100 years after slavery ended) when my father was legally able to sit down and eat a baloney sandwich in the break room beside a white man. Voting could still get a black person fired or killed in those days in some parts of America.
Oh, heck, the last day I had to sit in segregated movie seating in Oklahoma was July 20, 1969. Schools weren't desegregated where I was until 1967. In '65, rather than desegregate the municipal swimming pool--they simply destroyed it. The filled it in, leaving only a private club pool that could remain segregated. It wasn't until 1973 that they later built another municipal pool...in a predominantly black area of town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 06:39 PM
 
4,862 posts, read 7,967,802 times
Reputation: 5768
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
So are you suggesting if Africans, especially black Africans (don't forget, there is that whole part north of the Sahara which also has Africans) came over voluntarily, that then there would be no problem assimilating and not worry about 'identity'?

I wonder oppressed people like the Jews were able to keep their identity over 1000's of years? Pogroms, inquisitions, forced ghettos, etc, yet somehow although their past was destroyed many, many times, they kept their traditions, and verbal history.

Don't tell me that black slaves had it more difficult than Jews. Why was there not an oral history kept? The slave owners did not have to know about that.
How do you know a person is Jewish if they don't tell you? Start there and take a real view of the society and history. Slavery and Jim Crow destroyed the Black family. Yet people think generational damage can be healed overnight. Pick yourself up by your bootstraps.. Research Black Wall Street on you tube.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 08:43 PM
 
2,129 posts, read 1,779,115 times
Reputation: 8758
Quote:
Originally Posted by calipoppy View Post
You could be Japanese American and not speak Japanese or Irish American and never been to Ireland.
African American is simply a label of ethnic origin.


I personally prefer black but I use African American when I speak about the collective. However, one of my biggest pet peeves is that some people have begun to call ALL black people African American even if the people are Afro-Canadian, Afro Latino, etc.
I won't speak to the term "Afro-Latino" but if you live in Canada, African American is still accurate. It is the North AMERICAN continent after all.

This isn't America, or rather its is only a small part of North America. It is the United States of America. "America" or "Americas" still refers to the continent(s), not just this one country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 08:48 PM
 
2,129 posts, read 1,779,115 times
Reputation: 8758
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
So are you suggesting if Africans, especially black Africans (don't forget, there is that whole part north of the Sahara which also has Africans) came over voluntarily, that then there would be no problem assimilating and not worry about 'identity'?

I wonder oppressed people like the Jews were able to keep their identity over 1000's of years? Pogroms, inquisitions, forced ghettos, etc, yet somehow although their past was destroyed many, many times, they kept their traditions, and verbal history.

Don't tell me that black slaves had it more difficult than Jews. Why was there not an oral history kept? The slave owners did not have to know about that.
That is EXACTLY what I am telling you - YES, as a matter of fact, 400 years of total and abject slavery was a lot worse than the institutionalized ethnic hatred directed against the Jews during most of the same time frame. We didn't have Jews being sold at auction, routinely raped by their owners, whipped for looking at a "white" woman, or killed for having learned to read or teaching other slaves to read.

I'll give you the Holocaust, but let's not forget the 3 million non-Jews who were also killed in the concentration camps.

I guarantee you there would be VERY few slaves in the post-Columbian world who wouldn't have eagerly traded places with a Jewish person just about anywhere in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 08:53 PM
 
2,294 posts, read 2,781,463 times
Reputation: 3852
As a reminder, the topic is the term African American vs Black. Not which race was more or less oppressed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2016, 09:29 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,932,466 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltheEndofTime View Post
Well until black Americans are treated equally then we cannot just rug sweep and forget. We are still treated like second-class citizens being brutalized by police with impunity. My blackness affects how so many other people view and treat me and it affects how I experience and view the world.

It is very condescending for you as a non-black person to try to tell a black person how he or she should view themselves.
As a person who has physical scars as the result of discrimination, yes, I know a bit about it. My parents were refugees, and I am an immigrant. We were not liked, being called many derogatory names. Yeah, I've lived discrimination, so I think I can make some comments. Was it systemic? Yes, throughout my childhood it certainly was. And for a time being, into adulthood. On the other hand, no, my children are not affected by it.

Are there areas were people of color, and not just black, are not yet fully viewed as equals? You bet there is. But there I'd venture to say that in most of the US that is not the case. Nobody gives a rat's behind what color one's skin is in the Pacific North West, much of the western states, and most of the North East. Even in what was the deep south that is changing, North Carolina certainly comes to mind.

I don't view myself as that son of a refugee, and I don't view myself as that person who often suffered physical harm because of where I came from. That was then, those people were ignorant, some still are, but I refuse to let them define anything negative about me. My children were owed that.

A part of the larger conversation needs to be the number of blacks in particular, and the general population also, that is in prison. The US incarceration rate is arguably the highest in the world, and certainly the highest by far in the free world. That needs to change, and we need to stop stigmatizing young people for incidental use of drugs, especially marijuana. Portugal's system works there, and there is no reason it can't work here.

So, yes, I recognize there are some problems. It is ineffective to lump all issues together as if they all carried the same weight, and it is really ineffective to amplify smaller issues. That just dilutes the effect of highlighting those that must be dealt with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top