Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-01-2012, 06:19 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,549,158 times
Reputation: 957

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by srsmn View Post
Drop me headfirst into the ocean with a cinder block tied around my legs before you ever make me live anywhere in Joisey...
Its a Jersey thing :P haha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2012, 07:13 AM
 
27,340 posts, read 44,509,814 times
Reputation: 32669
Quote:
Originally Posted by srsmn View Post
Yeah, I'm sure THAT's why they did it....
Versus your much better theory?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2012, 08:13 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,653 posts, read 5,987,680 times
Reputation: 2331
Quote:
Originally Posted by srsmn View Post
Drop me headfirst into the ocean with a cinder block tied around my legs before you ever make me live anywhere in Joisey...
Joisey? Are you Buggs Bunny?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2012, 08:30 AM
 
Location: St. Louis, MO
4,009 posts, read 6,905,689 times
Reputation: 4613
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyle19125 View Post
Versus your much better theory?
My theory is that they'll be focusing on different population boundaries with different criteria each year.

For instance- it's hard for a small town of 10,000 people to stand up against a city of 1 million in a contest of 'best places' if you're trying to compare amenities and accessibility. Next year, we'll probably see cities of 100,000+ be the focus of the list.

Instead of doing 10 lists with all different population guidelines (and henceforth somewhat different criteria) they're just doing 1 mega list every year within a distinct population boundary.

Makes it simpler for them, I don't think it has anything to do with comparing the list between years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2012, 08:31 AM
 
4,794 posts, read 12,435,052 times
Reputation: 8404
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobwilliam77 View Post
America's best small cities (pop. 50,000 to 300,000).

Best Places to Live 2012 - Yahoo! Finance
15. Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ
Hasn't the Jersey devil been spotted in that area?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2012, 08:54 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,549,158 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by glamatomic View Post
My theory is that they'll be focusing on different population boundaries with different criteria each year.

For instance- it's hard for a small town of 10,000 people to stand up against a city of 1 million in a contest of 'best places' if you're trying to compare amenities and accessibility. Next year, we'll probably see cities of 100,000+ be the focus of the list.

Instead of doing 10 lists with all different population guidelines (and henceforth somewhat different criteria) they're just doing 1 mega list every year within a distinct population boundary.

Makes it simpler for them, I don't think it has anything to do with comparing the list between years
Regardless though its wonderful to see the hidden gem known as Carmel, Indiana be ranked as #1
Carmel is one of the best suburbs in the nation. You can get alot of Bang for your Buck in Carmel and Indianapolis for that matter. The Dollar goes further in Indy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2012, 06:23 AM
 
Location: Nesconset, NY
2,202 posts, read 4,356,405 times
Reputation: 2160
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacobwilliam77 View Post
America's best small cities (pop. 50,000 to 300,000).

Best Places to Live 2012 - Yahoo! Finance

1. Carmel, IN
2. McKinney, TX
3. Eden Prairie, MN
4. Newton, MA
5. Redmond, WA
6. Irvine, CA
7. Reston, VA
8. Columbia/Ellicott City, MD
9. Overland Park, KS
10. Chapel Hill, NC
11. Woodbury, MN
12. Fishers, IN
13. Allen, TX
14. Eagan, MN
15. Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ
16. Castle Rock, CO
17. Centreville, VA
18. South Jordan, UT
19. Lakeville, MN
20. Waldorf, MD

I think it would be intersting to learn of the impact it has on a community to be listed in a "Best Places" list and to read about "what are they like now".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2012, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,549,158 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIGuy1202 View Post
I think it would be intersting to learn of the impact it has on a community to be listed in a "Best Places" list and to read about "what are they like now".
Well Carmel and Fishers are the fastest growing suburbs in Indiana and the midwest.
Hamilton County gained 50% population in the past 10 years and nearly 100,000 people. which was 40% of the Indianapolis metro area's growth. the other half was in the western Suburbs and South Suburbs. Marion County/Indianapolis gained 10%.

So give it 5 years and well see if Carmel or Fishers can crack the 100,000 population barrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2012, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,678 posts, read 7,468,141 times
Reputation: 5400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broadrippleguy View Post
Well Carmel and Fishers are the fastest growing suburbs in Indiana and the midwest.
Also false. For example:

Fishers, Indiana: pop 2000: 37,835; pop 2010: 76,794; percent growth: 103%
Carmel, Indiana: pop 2000: 37,733; pop 2010: 79,191; percent growth: 109.9%
North Liberty, Iowa: pop 2000: 5,367; pop 2010: 13,374; percent growth: 149.2%
Waukee, Iowa: pop 2000: 5,126; pop 2010: 13,790; percent growth: 169.0%

There's more to the Midwest than just Indiana.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2012, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,892 posts, read 5,549,158 times
Reputation: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maintainschaos View Post
Also false. For example:

Fishers, Indiana: pop 2000: 37,835; pop 2010: 76,794; percent growth: 103%
Carmel, Indiana: pop 2000: 37,733; pop 2010: 79,191; percent growth: 109.9%
North Liberty, Iowa: pop 2000: 5,367; pop 2010: 13,374; percent growth: 149.2%
Waukee, Iowa: pop 2000: 5,126; pop 2010: 13,790; percent growth: 169.0%

There's more to the Midwest than just Indiana.
those arent suburbs. and even if they are they are under 25,000 so they shouldnt be counted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top