Why does Diane Keaton have wrinkles in real life but not in commercials for anti-aging skincare products? (hairstyles, fashion)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You know that woman is twisted . Did she not run over her own dog a few years back and laughed or giggled about it when asked about it ? Not someone I would put much stock in at all .So I dont believe Dianne k does not have any wrinkles when in fact she does .ugh
Hasn't Diane Keaton made enough money from her film career that she shouldn't need to get involved in falsely advertising beauty products?
Lols , in Hollywood you can never have enough money.
Most beauty product consumers know the best products come from dermatologists and aren't sold on infomercials, department stores or local cosmetics isle, but buy into commercial propaganda anyway.
It's not the point that Diane Keaton has wrinkles. At age 68 it's not surprising that people who age naturally will have them, and frankly it's quite refreshing to see a normally aging celebrity. It's that L'Oreal is using her face to sell anti-wrinkle cream and they have retouched her pictures to minimize her wrinkles way more than their cream can ever do. It's not the cream minimizing her wrinkles it's the photography. It is deceptive and in this case, to the extreme.
You know that woman is twisted . Did she not run over her own dog a few years back and laughed or giggled about it when asked about it ? Not someone I would put much stock in at all .So I dont believe Dianne k does not have any wrinkles when in fact she does .ugh
She also considers Woody Allen a paragon of virtue, too!
It's not the point that Diane Keaton has wrinkles. At age 68 it's not surprising that people who age naturally will have them, and frankly it's quite refreshing to see a normally aging celebrity. It's that L'Oreal is using her face to sell anti-wrinkle cream and they have retouched her pictures to minimize her wrinkles way more than their cream can ever do. It's not the cream minimizing her wrinkles it's the photography. It is deceptive and in this case, to the extreme.
It's infuriating
All these ads do is convey to women and men, that women with wrinkles are not beautiful.
That's why I like Jamie Lee Curtis, she did a photo spread some years back, all natural, she would not let them Photoshop her body at all. And I love that she doesn't color her hair!
I believe that was in More magazine -- she was the cover, in all perfection. On the inside they started it from beginning to end -- and how it took three hours to make her up and strap her in.... and then the airbrushing.
It's sad -- I can remember when mascara ads showed women in mascara and not in loads of fake lashes and mascara. In fact -- I was incredibly disappointed in mascara because I used to have lashes like the ads... I thought it was my fault. I tried new mascara, I tried expensive mascara... nothing worked.
I had to really look at the ads to see it wasn't me.
Sort of the thing with clothing, too -- I just hate when I see perfectly lovely women hate themselves over clothing not fitting. Women can really beat themselves up over it.
It's not YOU, it's the CLOTHING.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
