Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-21-2008, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
1,577 posts, read 2,668,192 times
Reputation: 416

Advertisements

Instead of a snippet, where is the entire speech?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-21-2008, 08:19 AM
 
2,215 posts, read 3,624,995 times
Reputation: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by LNTT_Vacationer View Post
I think when this is over he has a bright future as a cult leader. . . a Sun Myung Moon of the 2000's.

I agree soooo much. He has surely suckered and scammed so many people.

Nothing should be above his pay grade, heck he only raked in 4.2 million last year on a 150k Senator salary and is such a great scholar you know!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,063,102 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Instead of a snippet, where is the entire speech?
Go find it yourself. I'm sure there is a transcript available - afterall he was in the Ill senate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Charlotte
12,642 posts, read 15,643,480 times
Reputation: 1680
Default Sen. Barack Obama, on “When does a baby get human rights?”

"The humble man Kneels before God" - Indiana Jones

Good! We need a Presidential Candidate who realizes that some decisions are beyond his scope of determination. We have endless attorneys, doctors, scientists, citizens and the Supreme Court who can and have spent countless hours doing the best they can to determine the best answer to this question.

In the end they have all done the best they can, and it's above everyone's pay grade. The expectation that he should draw a line in the sand is silly, and exposes the naivety of those who expect him to do so, when done without proper weight to the overall issue.

This opinion piece would have more credibility had it expressed a truer sense of understanding regarding the Senator's stance on the Bill mentioned in Illinois Legislature.


"2001 and 2002: OBAMA JOINED MORE THAN 40% OF THE ILLINOIS SENATE—INCLUDING NUMEROUS REPUBLICANS—IN OPPOSING “BORN ALIVE” BILLS
Obama Voted Against Two Born Alive Bills, With Almost a Quarter of the Senate, Saying They Would Be Struck Down. In 2002, Obama voted against a bill to create the Induced Birth Infant Liability Act to provide that if a child is born alive after an induced labor abortion or other abortion, a parent or public guardian of the child may recover damages for costs of care to preserve and protect the life, health, and safety of the child, punitive damages, and costs and attorney’s fees against a hospital, health care facility, or health care provider who harms or neglects the child or fails to provide medical care to the child after it is born. Obama voted against a bill to amend the Statute on Statutes, to define “born-alive infant” to include “every infant member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.” Further defines “born alive” to mean “the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother of an infant, at any stage of development, who after that expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut and regardless of whether of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.” Obama predicted the bills would be struck down by a federal court were they to become law. Obama said, “Whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or other elements of the Constitution, we’re saying they are persons entitled to the kinds of protections provided to a child, a 9-month-old child delivered to term…That determination then essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.” [92nd GA, SB 1661, 4/4/02, 3R P; 31-11-10 (BO: N); 92nd GA, SB 1662, 4/4/02, 3R P; 30-12-10 (BO: N); Sun-Times, 3/31/01]"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 09:07 AM
 
1,555 posts, read 1,984,345 times
Reputation: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paka View Post
Yea, like "don't ask me" it is too hard a decision for ME to make is what I want to hear for the fruitcake running for President...sure helps me feel warm and fuzzy all over.
You don't get it. What he was saying was more akin with "it's not my place - OR ANY Presidential candidate's place - to make that decision." When does life begin? That is a highly philosophical and ultimately PERSONAL decision. That is the whole idea behind pro-CHOICE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 09:32 AM
 
1,555 posts, read 1,984,345 times
Reputation: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
It's certainly not above his pay grade to deny basic medical care to "born alive" babies. He can answer that question, can't he?
Can you read? Are you able to understand anything that is not blasted on Fox News? He does NOT oppose medical care to born alive babies. That is the most idiotic assertion I have ever heard.

When that bill was in the Illinois Senate and Obama voted on it, it was in a form that clearly undermined Roe v. Wade. ALSO opposing the bill at that stage were Pro-choice republicans and the best doctors in the state. The federal version of this bill was a very different animal and he has always said that he would have voted for that. PLUS, Illinois law already requires medical care in the event that babies are born alive during abortions

Now enough of this ridiculous slander. Can't you come up with anything about Obama that isn't based on lies?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,063,102 times
Reputation: 7118
Can YOU read the very simple document that came out of obama's committee proving that they inserted the very same federal language protecting Roe, and THEN voted down the complete bill?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 10:30 AM
 
1,555 posts, read 1,984,345 times
Reputation: 257
Default nope

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Can YOU read the very simple document that came out of obama's committee proving that they inserted the very same federal language protecting Roe, and THEN voted down the complete bill?
That's not true. The Illinois Senate bill did not have the very same Federal language. While the differences between the Federal and State versions were just a few words, those few words amounted to significantly different definitions. The state versions gave full legal rights to fetuses that were not yet viable. And, specifically, the State version did not include a part that clarified that "legal rights of a person" did not extend to fetuses that were not born yet. Thus, it was viewed to be a possible threat to Roe v. Wade (which is why SOOO many people - including the best doctors - voted against it.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 45,063,102 times
Reputation: 7118
You are incorrect. The language was the same, taken from the federal bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-21-2008, 10:38 AM
 
Location: southern california
61,254 posts, read 87,672,823 times
Reputation: 55570
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
‘Pay grade’ unartful dodge - BostonHerald.com



Words, barry, just "words". I just don't get it. He knew this subject would be coming up - and that's the best he could do? He is his own worst enemy.

Don't get me wrong - I loved it when he said that.
why is the job of commander and chief being pushed so very hard.
hard right is a one trick pony find somebody and declare war on them.
then whoever is in office no matter how incompetent is our savior.
can we stop doing this please? wars cost money.
lots of john wayne talk while emelda marcos spending.
marlboro man at the mall with a fist full of credit cards?

Last edited by Huckleberry3911948; 08-21-2008 at 12:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top