Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What the hell are "ingorant" people? Oh, I get it, you mean black folks like you-know-who, who didn't stay tricked by that weak-tailed ****** Barack Obama. Please explain, for the benefit of all us "ingorant" people, why everyone who disagrees with you is a race hater, but how you are not one for making such knee-jerk assumptions?
I was never planning to vote for that radical leftist empty-suit Obama anyway but I just ran across this and it scared the hell out of me. This IDIOT plans on unilaterally disarming the nation. Probably to fund his ridiculous socialist proposals. God I hope that the American people aren't stupid enough to elect this kook.
You just don't want Obama to be president because he's not some fat,ugly,white fart.It's obvious.
No, Obama is a woefully inexperienced socialist who would raise taxes through the roof to get as many people dependent on the government dole so as to keep them voting for Democrats. Not to mention the fact that he wants to eviscerate the military, spend billions to fight a non-existent threat (global warming), and is incredibly ant-gun. In other words, Obama is a clueless jackass who isn't qualified to run a Salvation Army soup kitchen.
No, Obama is a woefully inexperienced socialist who would raise taxes through the roof to get as many people dependent on the government dole so as to keep them voting for Democrats. Not to mention the fact that he wants to eviscerate the military, spend billions to fight a non-existent threat (global warming), and is incredibly ant-gun. In other words, Obama is a clueless jackass who isn't qualified to run a Salvation Army soup kitchen.
Aren't all politicians socialists?
I'm curious, why does Warren Buffet believe taxes on "his class" are too low?
Does the percentage the US spends on the military budget concern you? Should it be higher or lower? Does Senator Obama's plan conflict with Donald Rumsfeld's plan, and if so is it correct now or wrong if Senator Obama continues along that path?
Was the hole in the ozone layer a non-existent threat or is global warming along those same lines?
I'm curious, why does Warren Buffet believe taxes on "his class" are too low?
Does the percentage the US spends on the military budget concern you? Should it be higher or lower? Does Senator Obama's plan conflict with Donald Rumsfeld's plan, and if so is it correct now or wrong if Senator Obama continues along that path?
Was the hole in the ozone layer a non-existent threat or is global warming along those same lines?
1) Warren Buffett is a radical leftist.
Quote:
[SIZE=3]The wealthy already pay a disproportionately high amount of taxes. The top one percent of earners paid 39.4 percent of all federal income taxes in 2005. The top five percent pay almost 60 percent of federal taxes. Golodryga did, however, make time to compare Buffett to Robin Hood, complete with an on-screen graphic, and harass other billionaires over the salaries of their receptionists.
2) Military spending as a percentage of GDP is as low as it's been in over 40 years.
3) Donald Rumsfeld is a private citizen so why you're bringing him up is beyond me. Obama doesn't have a plan beyond jeopardizing our national security with drastic defense budget cuts and his incredibly naive foreign policy.
4) This site is a an excellent compilation of scientists and studies which prove that this global warming insanity is the biggest, and most expensive, fraud attempted in modern history.
I suggest you watch the video that I posted in the first part of this thread. Game...set...match.
President Bush, and Donald Rumsfeld, have been the real threats to our national security. During Rumsfeld’s tenure as Secretary of Defense, we saw the greatest reduction of our armed forces and dismantling of military installations since the end of World War II; and at a time when our reserves and National Guard units are stretched to the breaking point leaving the nation unmanned and unprepared to meet our global commitments and provide for the national defense, or even respond to natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina. This was an ongoing battle with Secretary Rumsfeld, and his plans were not been well-received by Republicans in the House Armed Services Committee. As any real Republican will tell you we need more (not less) armed forces.
In addition to reducing the size of the military, former Secretary Rumsfeld all but did away with the Division based structure of the army, and replaced it with a smaller, more "agile" Brigade - smaller even than the current T.O.E. ("Table of Organization and Equipment"). This was a bad idea. We have over fifty years of experience with the modern Division, which has proven successful in every combat environment and theater of operation. The Brigade structure won't work because it is simply too small to be self-sustaining in the field; and without the logistical support that is component to the Division-size organization, will be ineffective (i.e., it will very rapidly run out of "beans and bullets" needed to sustain combat operations). Experience has shown that the Division is the smallest unit ground force capable of independent combat operations; and yet flexible enough to be "tailored" to meet any contingency and rapid deployment anywhere. Secretary Rumsfeld’s proposal to scrap the Division is overwhelmingly opposed by the Army brass; and more than a few generals were cashiered (i.e., forced to retire) for voicing their opposition to him.
We need to restore our military forces that have been seriously weakened by President Bush. John McCain will not do this.
Checkmate!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
