Clinton wins Kentucky by a landslide vote !! (enemy, states, support)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Thank you I forgot that. What I find funny is that I keep seeing that hard working people don't like Obama and that lower middle class people don't like Obama and that blue collar workers don't like Obama. But I rarely see the claim here that we the intelligent and successful visionaries of America in the 21st century don't like the man. Hmmmm wonder who will be doing the best personally in 20 years?
I expect most of the I&S Vs will be reaping the rewards of the positive social and economic seeds sown during the Obama presidency. Some will be out on the porch boring their grandchildren with reminiscences of their time in his cabinet when they helped make A strong again. Then they'll all drive out to Omaha to put dollars on W Buffett's grave.
Here's a list of welfare case loads per capita by state. DC and Guam are 1 and 2, after that, RI is #3, Ca. #5, WV#8, Ind.#9., all states that Clinton won. Your contention is not backed up by the facts.
No use trying to educate the uneducated, i.e. those who spout before having done their own homework. They're not about to change.
All govts. talk to the terrorist regimes. Obama has said he will do this openly. If you think that the UK wasn't in talks with the IRA or the USA isn't in talks with Iran or other radicals in secret, you are extremely naive. The only problem with talking openly is that you give the terrorist organisations credibility. You have to pick who you decide that the public should know about, that you are in negotiations with. Make no mistake, though, ALL govts. negotiate with terror groups but in secret.
All govts. talk to the terrorist regimes. Obama has said he will do this openly. If you think that the UK wasn't in talks with the IRA or the USA isn't in talks with Iran or other radicals in secret, you are extremely naive. The only problem with talking openly is that you give the terrorist organisations credibility. You have to pick who you decide that the public should know about, that you are in negotiations with. Make no mistake, though, ALL govts. negotiate with terror groups but in secret.
Obama said he'd meet with all leaders. Openly. He is too naive to understand the ramifications and why countries take the approach you've outlined.
You know you keep starting new threads - but you never answered my question about the welfare and food banks...just wondering if there was an answer or if you make a habit of randomly saying things that people may find offensive and then leaving?
Obama said he'd meet with all leaders. Openly. He is too naive to understand the ramifications and why countries take the approach you've outlined.
So what's the alternative to this approach? Sitting idle for the next 15 years? Of course Iran and Syria are terror sponsoring states as defined by US so is the US [terror sponsoring state] as define by almost certainly the entire middle east if not the rest of the world.
Obama justs wants to appease the terrorists. I know this because George W. Bush says so, and everyone knows he has been such an adept master genius at foreign affairs during his 8 year run playing President.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Clinton wins Kentucky by a landslide vote !!
