Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But if it was about the election "not being rigged" and nothing else, then recounts would happen in every single state. At minimum, every single state where the vote was close. Why isn't that happening? Because the Dems don't give a crap about truth or justice or anything like that.
Or maybe there's another reason why Jill Stein (who isn't a Democrat) isn't calling for a recount in every single state.
It costs a lot of money. Perhaps she thought she could only raise enough funding for a few states.
In all instances, optional recounts are paid for by the candidate, their political party, or, in some instances, by any interested voter.
The strategy is to not finish the recount before 12/13/16 which would prevent
the 10 WI electors from attending the electoral college vote on the 19th. Thus, Trump would
lose 10 electoral votes. Same for MI & PA which then drops him below the magic number of 270.
Don't think that they didn't plot this out at the Soros meeting after the election.....
Then a republican congress would choose, no?
But I don't think this would ever happen. If it did, then we truly deserve banana republic status.
During the final debate Trump did not confirm or deny that he would, or would not accept the results of the election.
Hillary was so shocked she said it was 'horrifying', she went on to say,
“That’s not the way our democracy works. We’ve been around 240 years. We’ve had free and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. President Obama said the other day that when you’re whining before the game is even finished it just shows you’re not even up to doing the job. “
She added, “And let’s be clear about what he’s saying and what he means. He’s denigrating—he’s talking down our democracy. I for one am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our major two parties would take that kind of position.”
Clinton was later asked by reporters about Trump’s statement at the debate and she said, “I truly doubt he has ever ready the Constitution.”
The strategy is to not finish the recount before 12/13/16 which would prevent
the 10 WI electors from attending the electoral college vote on the 19th. Thus, Trump would
lose 10 electoral votes. Same for MI & PA which then drops him below the magic number of 270.
Don't think that they didn't plot this out at the Soros meeting after the election.....
There was a Soros meeting after the election? Tell me more.
During the final debate Trump did not confirm or deny that he would, or would not accept the results of the election.
Hillary was so shocked she said it was 'horrifying', she went on to say,
“That’s not the way our democracy works. We’ve been around 240 years. We’ve had free and fair elections and we’ve accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. President Obama said the other day that when you’re whining before the game is even finished it just shows you’re not even up to doing the job. “
She added, “And let’s be clear about what he’s saying and what he means. He’s denigrating—he’s talking down our democracy. I for one am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our major two parties would take that kind of position.”
Clinton was later asked by reporters about Trump’s statement at the debate and she said, “I truly doubt he has ever ready the Constitution.”
Typical Hillary.
If you think about it, it is typical for democratic politicians. "What you DO doesn't matter. It's o nly what you SAY that matters."
If she can get someone else pay for all of that for her, why do you care?
Excuse me. I am referring to her (hypothetical) spending of the money in the $6 Million Dollar Fund... for her own personal needs. Can you guarantee she won't try to pilfer some of the money? We need to know who is controlling the money that all the brainwashed Hillary Lovers put into the fund. A list of donors and how many donations were Hillary herself? As much as I detest Hillary, the brainwashed voters NEED to see that too, so I would like to see accountability for all the money in the fund. Why should that be so difficult? You throw up a fund on a webpage and asked people to donate to it? Donaters have a right to know where there money is being spent.
Its not going to happen. Apart from the fact that she conceded the election already, you can't simply ask for a recount because some leftist computer geeks want you to do so. No, states have laws regarding recounts and Trump is outside of the margin that would trigger a recount in the states in question.
I doubt the recount will change anything, but the fact that she conceded means nothing. A candidate's concession isn't legally binding.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
