Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Caucus States, where Paul has the organization and the truth about his message is finally getting to the people, are going to be tough to win for Newt and Romney.
Yup, I don't know how in earth Newt will defeat Paul in the caucus state of Iowa. Looks like he'll be stuck relying on the double digit lead he holds:
Remember, nothing is impossible and never say never.
If there is will, there will be a way.
The will of the people are fed up with the status quo, you wish to perpetuate, at the moment.
and I never say never or I certainly don't mean too, of course nothing is impossible, but some types of polls are not legit, you know this and so does everyone else.
The Oklahoma State Straw Poll showing wasn't something that was organized by the Paul campaign, if that is what you are inferring.
No, did I ever say that? I said these types of polls are not scientific and are not accurate in any way. I am not saying his people had anything to do with it. I don't think Paul supporters have organized any of the straw polls, this isn't the way they work.
I can't argue with you on that one, but the fact still remains, these polls are just bunk...
I think the thing we all have to look at and too many seem to miss: anytime, at this stage a candidate gets 20% more than their next competitor and the competitor has suspended his campaign you kmow there is something wrong. Even if the 2nd place candidate was still running, at this stage no one candidate would get nearly 50% in any legit poll, I don't care what poll it is. Now when we get down to 3 or 4 candidates, maybe..
Nita
The poll are junk when Paul won, but meaningful when others won.
Why should we believe you? All your statement tells us is you hang out with folks who are like you.
Senator Coburn (Dr No of the Senate) from Oklahoma is making noise again. It wouldn't surprise me if he backed Ron Paul.
I wonder why it is doctors like Ron Paul, Tom Coburn and the late Lawrence McDonald (Dem by the way) who know what's up?
I'd tend to think it holds a bit more water than a free poll but not thinking clearly? If you want to see unclear see the first part of your post.
you know these polls hold no water, none what-so-ever. As for Senator Coburn, I am very much aware of what he is saying. I do read a few publications daily, a couple of weekly magazines and yes, watch some TV, including Fox and CNN.
What I am referring to as to who is or is not supporting who, has more to do with what I hear from young people, not from people my age. I do think I have a slight connection thou with OK.
The poll are junk when Paul won, but meaningful when others won.
nope, they are all bunk. They give a candidate or his/her supporters brangging rights and help bring in a few $$s. Have you ever seen me claim any of them are meaningful??/
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
