Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-13-2012, 02:01 PM
 
577 posts, read 1,001,394 times
Reputation: 629

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaker281 View Post
I agree that the government should not be the one to pick winners and losers in a capitalistic society. But, using your "Wimpy" analogy, letting two huge manufacturing giants implode in the midst of a global financial crisis, in the hopes that something good would emerge from the ashes, may be the ultimate "bird-in-the-hand" scenario. I doubt that any other country would not have helped out a flagship manufacturing entity under similar circumstances.

It is estimated that 30,000 jobs were lost when Circuit City went under. Mostly not so great paying retail jobs. It was estimated that without government intervention more than 1,000,000 jobs would have been lost in the already suffering "rust belt". A huge difference!

FWIW: "In all, the Center for Automotive Research (CAR) in Ann Arbor, Mich., reckons the government's bailouts of the U.S. auto industry spared more than 1.14 million jobs in 2009, and prevented "additional personal income losses" of nearly $97 billion in 2009 and 2010. Another 314,400 jobs were saved in 2010. The research organization based its conclusions on the potential impact of auto-industry collapse for jobs at U.S. automakers and suppliers, and ripple effects on the economy at large. Like it or not, the auto industry is critical to the U.S. economy. CAR estimated the loss of 3 million jobs over three years if GM and Chrysler were allowed to go belly-up, with only about 240,000 jobs being at the auto manufacturers themselves. The rest were the attendant industries that interconnect with autos. The loss of personal income by the end of 2011 would have been $400 billion by the end of 2011, and the costs to the U.S. Treasury would have been $156 billion, according to CAR."


Circuit city was a retailer in a sea of other retailers. GM and Chrysler are both US manufacturing giants. Long before Circuit City closed it's doors the products it sold were already rerouted to other distribution channels. Not nearly the same overall impact as seeing 2/3 of US automotive manufacturing snuffed out.

Until the GM stock is sold, no one knows how much the US taxpayer lost. Fair Market Value of GM stock is estimated to be twice what it currently trades at. Meanwhile GM has regained their #1 top selling position and is generating billions in tax revenues annually, while their employees continue to earn wages. Not all bad.

So, just a few pieces of info to view through your objective lenses. As far as the political thing, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. But, an individuals own determination of their objectivity is mainly, well, subjective! And support of the auto industry bailout is very much split along lines of political ideology. "Elected officials such as Alabama Senator Richard Shelby, who can't count a Detroit auto plant among his constituents, has been against the bailout. But Shelby, against government assistance for private companies in general, has been nonetheless supportive of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies going to Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, Kia and Honda and parts companies to attract those companies' plants to Alabama"
But we don't know the opportunity cost of not allowing Chrysler to fail in the 70's, the more we prop up any failing business the more we reward inefficiency in the market.

I don't care about elected officials that talk out both sides of their mouth. These subsidies, bailouts, etc. are all wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2012, 01:08 AM
 
4,765 posts, read 3,733,913 times
Reputation: 3038
Quote:
Originally Posted by msdmoney View Post
But we don't know the opportunity cost of not allowing Chrysler to fail in the 70's, the more we prop up any failing business the more we reward inefficiency in the market.

I don't care about elected officials that talk out both sides of their mouth. These subsidies, bailouts, etc. are all wrong.
AIG is a thriving company that earned the US taxpayer a profit of $28 Billion. That represent real results not hypothetical constructs. Jobs were saved and confidence in the US economy was maintained. No one ever knows the result of the road not taken. But, positive outcomes speak for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 07:49 AM
 
621 posts, read 658,459 times
Reputation: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_row View Post
Then the next shoe to fall is sequestration.
The Fed got permission to pump up the DOW after that shoe fell so we are just having another bubble. And it may be big enough to drag the EU up with us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Berkeley Neighborhood, Denver, CO USA
17,712 posts, read 29,834,812 times
Reputation: 33306
Default Data are your friends

Calculated Risk: U.S. Light Vehicle Sales increased to 15.9 million annual rate in June, Highest since November 2007



Data show the OP was WRONG!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 08:50 AM
 
5,546 posts, read 6,877,327 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by pie_row View Post
The Fed got permission to pump up the DOW after that shoe fell so we are just having another bubble. And it may be big enough to drag the EU up with us.
The worst part is that the bubbles get larger each round, while the pain on the street gets worse (even during the "good times" and "recoveries").
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-15-2013, 02:58 PM
 
621 posts, read 658,459 times
Reputation: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJNEOA View Post
The worst part is that the bubbles get larger each round, while the pain on the street gets worse (even during the "good times" and "recoveries").
If you want to relieve the pain on the street then higher wages on the bottom end. Turn this bubble into inflation that will relieve debts all the way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 12:22 AM
 
329 posts, read 460,632 times
Reputation: 316
Here In Europe car industry is not good. French industries are leaving France. Psa(Peugeot and Citroën) are gone to Morocco.

Basically who can buy a new car when people make barely 1500$ a month.?

French car are considered low class . people want german. Audi, BMW, Mercedes or Volkswagen .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2013, 05:50 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,204,163 times
Reputation: 13779
Quote:
Originally Posted by RegQ View Post
The auto industry "come back" seems like nothing more than the fulfillment of pent up demand from when consumers weren't buying nearly as many cars during the last recession. That being said, I predict that the industry will face another downward spiral once this pent up demand is satisfied and the channel stuffing GM and Chrysler are doing catches up to them. I think this will start to happen sometime early next year which of course will be after the election, giving Obama the luxury of continuing to run on his "success" at bailing out the industry. That's my prediction, anyway. I'd be curious to know what the prevailng wisdom is at large.
Another crystal ball failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2013, 10:22 AM
 
621 posts, read 658,459 times
Reputation: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linda_d View Post
Another crystal ball failure.
It is hard to argue against the Fed's printing press. The Fed is intent on blowing another bubble. The bubble is happening and the bubble will pop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2013, 10:08 PM
 
4,583 posts, read 3,410,316 times
Reputation: 2605
I want my 1990 Fleetwood Brougham back, and will reward any company that makes an equivalent. I got my first Fleetwood at age 22, it's all I have driven since. If 1990 GM could make a 6 passenger, 5500 pound car with a 5.7L and get 27 HYW, why aren't the new small cars getting 50 out of the gate.

It was very frustrating during cash for clunkers to see that my favorite caddy was now 40% smaller, sat 2 less and lost 1/3 of it's HP but was ineligible because it got the same gas mileage. It would take a real clustertruck to pull that off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top