Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2012, 02:42 PM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,935,370 times
Reputation: 7554

Advertisements

I'm a little ignorant on this. Apologies.

It seems I was seeing 500 billion annual deficits under Bush 2, who wreaked havoc on the economy with two unfunded wars. Then when Obama entered office he got us out of Iraq yet I started seeing 1 trillion annual deficits. So it seems we can look forward to the national debt growing by roughly a trillion a year for the next 4 years, assuming he gets reelected---that is, assuming all stays the same, about 20 trillion by the time he leaves office. How did the deficit double under his tenure? And can the country survive with a 20 trillion dollar debt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2012, 02:52 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,098 posts, read 83,020,975 times
Reputation: 43671
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
I'm a little ignorant on this. Apologies.
Ever see an avalanche come down a mountain?

It builds and builds and builds... until close to the end when it has all that mass.
Most of that mass was *inside* of it long before the end when you can finally see how deep it really is.

hth
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 03:27 PM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,935,370 times
Reputation: 7554
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Ever see an avalanche come down a mountain?

It builds and builds and builds... until close to the end when it has all that mass.
Most of that mass was *inside* of it long before the end when you can finally see how deep it really is.

hth
Yes, but this like happened overnight. It didn't go from 500b to 600b to 800b to 900b. It was like 2008: 500b, then 2009: 1T.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 03:58 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,098 posts, read 83,020,975 times
Reputation: 43671
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
Yes, but this like happened overnight.
Nope... it sure didn't
It started shortly after W came into office, exacerbated by reductions in tax rates
at the same time that two land wars in Asia were going on...
plus of course the debacle of the financial and RE market meltdown he bequeathed.

With BUSH in office the national debt was $5,943,438,563,436 on 12/31/2001
Which grew to $8,170,424,541,313 12/31/2005... then to $10,699,804,864,612 12/31/2008

Since then t
he national debt (that avalanche effect) gas grown to $15,125,898,976,397 12/31/20111

Oh yeah... and it didn't double during the last term but it did rise by 41%. (15.1 vs 10.7)
What's amazing is that it didn't go even higher than it has.

ETA: (It is higher now -at about 16T- but still not doubled)

Source

Last edited by MrRational; 08-11-2012 at 04:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 04:13 PM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,453,984 times
Reputation: 10760
There's a good reason George W. Bush has kept a very low profile since 2008, and won't even be attending this year's Republican Convention... he's almost the Invisible Man of the Republican Party. It's because on his watch the regulations got lifted that allowed the financial markets to crash so badly, and the plays were set in motion that transformed the Clinton surplus into a growing deficit. Then the Republicans and Tea Party got together to obstruct even the most moderate Administration attempts to restore previous taxes on the rich and on corporations.

As a popular internet meme put it... Photo of George W with a thumbs up and a big grin and the caption: "Thanks for blaming the (new) guy!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 05:21 PM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,935,370 times
Reputation: 7554
Yes, but wasn't Bush just following the script handed to him by the elite power brokers behind the curtain? It's not like he and Cheney were in a room plotting all this on their own. They were taking very explicit directions on how to turn the world stage in the direction the Wizards wanted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 07:39 PM
 
Location: The Woodlands
805 posts, read 1,873,763 times
Reputation: 1077
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillobyte View Post
. And can the country survive with a 20 trillion dollar debt?
No, at some point the US Govt is going to default on some of its obligations. We will be Greece on a much bigger scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 07:47 PM
 
18,250 posts, read 16,935,370 times
Reputation: 7554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cranston View Post
No, at some point the US Govt is going to default on some of its obligations. We will be Greece on a much bigger scale.
Which obligations are the most likely in your opinion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 08:19 PM
 
3,788 posts, read 5,335,473 times
Reputation: 6319
Restating OP's question:

Why did deficit double under Obama?

Answer: Because Obama was unable to triple or quadruple it. Republican-dominated House stopped him.

Any other questions? That one was easy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2012, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,173,926 times
Reputation: 19098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak View Post
Restating OP's question:

Why did deficit double under Obama?

Answer: Because Obama was unable to triple or quadruple it. Republican-dominated House stopped him.

Any other questions? That one was easy.
Actually, the deficit decreased under Obama. Not doubled, not tripled. Decreased. And it had nothing to do with Republicans as they didn't gain control of House until 2010... they the allowed an increase in the deficit, although not to the levels achieved under Bush. Bushy has the dubious honor of nearly increasing the deficit by 10-fold. Good job, Bush!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top