Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2018, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Woburn, MA / W. Hartford, CT
6,154 posts, read 5,123,948 times
Reputation: 4142

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
CTfastrak ridership is running higher than projections. Last year it served more than 5 million riders. You obviously are seeing buses during off peak hours when few people are on them. This is not uncommon for any mass transit in cities the size of Hartford. Jay
Still waiting to see the proof of decreased congestion & travel times on I-84 west of Hartford. That was the original project justification.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2018, 08:53 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,844,487 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by htfdcolt View Post
Still waiting to see the proof of decreased congestion & travel times on I-84 west of Hartford. That was the original project justification.
That was only one of the reasons for creating the busway, not the one and only reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2018, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,844,487 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimG2 View Post
I'm going to assume that 5 million riders is double the number of actual riders. 2.5 million each way, right? government has a way of skewing numbers to look good to their ****ty decisions.

2,500,000 divided by 365 equals 6,850 to and from riders per day.

Newington, at best has 80 cars parked there per day. 80 riders per day from Newington station.

Where are the other almost 6,800 other riders coming from? If there are 20 stations that's almost 340 riders per station. But Newington is only doing 80? The numbers are a total sham to make it look good.
You do know that people can get dropped off or even walk to the bus station ? No reason to believe 80 parked cars means only 80 people took the bus.

You also should take another look at Downtown New Britain during AM + PM commute times. There's a lot of pedestrian traffic in and out of that bus station.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2018, 09:12 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,969 posts, read 57,045,368 times
Reputation: 11229
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimG2 View Post
I'm going to assume that 5 million riders is double the number of actual riders. 2.5 million each way, right? government has a way of skewing numbers to look good to their ****ty decisions.

2,500,000 divided by 365 equals 6,850 to and from riders per day.

Newington, at best has 80 cars parked there per day. 80 riders per day from Newington station.

Where are the other almost 6,800 other riders coming from? If there are 20 stations that's almost 340 riders per station. But Newington is only doing 80? The numbers are a total sham to make it look good.
The ridership numbers can’t be “doubled”. These are certified and reported to the Federal Transit Agency for funding purposes. If you look at how the system works you will see that other bus routes feed into CTFastrak so most riders are coming from there. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2018, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,969 posts, read 57,045,368 times
Reputation: 11229
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGompers View Post
That was only one of the reasons for creating the busway, not the one and only reason.
That is correct. The real value of CTfastrak will come in about 10 years when I-84 is being reconstructed west of downtown. It will offer commuters a mass transit commuting option much like a Shoreline East did during the Q Bridge in New Haven. Rowland almost killed Shoreline East but found he could not because it was committed to improve service for use while I-95 was being widened. Today it is a thriving commuter line. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2018, 09:17 AM
 
1,735 posts, read 1,154,497 times
Reputation: 2291
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
That is correct. The real value of CTfastrak will come in about 10 years when I-84 is being reconstructed west of downtown. It will offer commuters a mass transit commuting option much like a Shoreline East did during the Q Bridge in New Haven. Rowland almost killed Shoreline East but found he could not because it was committed to improve service for use while I-95 was being widened. Today it is a thriving commuter line. Jay
So the moral to the story seems to be that it takes major highway reconstruction to get people out of their cars, but once they get out of them, they never want to go back. They realize commuter rail and rapid bus transit systems are actually much better ways of commuting, especially during rush hour.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2018, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,844,487 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanthegoldengod View Post
So the moral to the story seems to be that it takes major highway reconstruction to get people out of their cars, but once they get out of them, they never want to go back. They realize commuter rail and rapid bus transit systems are actually much better ways of commuting, especially during rush hour.
The moral of the story is that highway expansion isn't really feasible in the Hartford area. Most of the land is already built out especially west of Hartford. Creating a busway gives people an alternative and it removes the buses from the highway. Which in and of itself relives congestion. It also frees up parking in Hartford which is mostly at capacity already.

Hartford and CT in general is way above average when it comes to public transportation. And that is a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2018, 09:42 AM
 
Location: Woburn, MA / W. Hartford, CT
6,154 posts, read 5,123,948 times
Reputation: 4142
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
That is correct. The real value of CTfastrak will come in about 10 years when I-84 is being reconstructed west of downtown. It will offer commuters a mass transit commuting option much like a Shoreline East did during the Q Bridge in New Haven. Rowland almost killed Shoreline East but found he could not because it was committed to improve service for use while I-95 was being widened. Today it is a thriving commuter line. Jay
This is justification after the fact. The I-84 reconstruction plans are still being laid out and debated. The busway planning and construction dates back to at least 2007 when I moved to CT. Not denying there will be a benefit if/when I-84 does get shut down temporarily, but our politicians just don't have the long-term vision you're ascribing to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2018, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,969 posts, read 57,045,368 times
Reputation: 11229
Quote:
Originally Posted by htfdcolt View Post
This is justification after the fact. The I-84 reconstruction plans are still being laid out and debated. The busway planning and construction dates back to at least 2007 when I moved to CT. Not denying there will be a benefit if/when I-84 does get shut down temporarily, but our politicians just don't have the long-term vision you're ascribing to them.
They don’t? I strongly disagree. You are correct that planning for the busway dates back almost 20 years and it is years before the I-84 project is under construction but the fact that CTfastrak is serving more than 5 million riders a year shows it is doing what it was envisioned to do. It offers dedicated and reliable bus service that more and more riders are using. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2018, 01:00 PM
 
1,735 posts, read 1,154,497 times
Reputation: 2291
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGompers View Post
The moral of the story is that highway expansion isn't really feasible in the Hartford area. Most of the land is already built out especially west of Hartford. Creating a busway gives people an alternative and it removes the buses from the highway. Which in and of itself relives congestion. It also frees up parking in Hartford which is mostly at capacity already.

Hartford and CT in general is way above average when it comes to public transportation. And that is a good thing.
I agree about the importance of public transportation but Fastrak doesn't remove buses from the highway. All the express buses are still operational and will remain so. If you live in, say, Glastonbury it is much more convenient to drive to one of the commuter parking lots in town and take the Route 2 express bus to Hartford than to drive to a Fastrak location and hop on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top