Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city has the best culture, food, and quality of life?
Chicago 140 31.25%
New York 194 43.30%
San Francisco 114 25.45%
Voters: 448. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-26-2013, 09:20 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,955,508 times
Reputation: 8436

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
Devon Street Little India, Koreatown in Albany Park, Argyle (Uptown Chinatown), Little Village. As I said, to a lesser extent but there are some areas like that.
Yeah Devon is a pretty entry-level copy of a Mumbai street. Right down to the paan stains on the floor, paan is chewing tabacco that Indian people usually consume after lunch or dinner, at times. In the alleys or nearby park, around noon you can find a few families playing Cricket sometimes. Both in Chicago and Mumbai, Indian tourists or locals make the comparison of Lake Shore Drive to Marine Drive in Mumbai, which was inspired by Lake Shore Drive, as an urban thoroughfare along the waterfront.

Pilsen, is typically where people in Chicago go for Mexican or Salvadoran food. There's Chinatown in the Southside, and so on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
You can make whichever argument you like, I never really made a case for or against. Only what is.


Well it's your perogative to talk about that if you like.
Well, asking a question isn't making an argument just yet. It was just to see what your opinion is on the matter and even though I didn't exactly get a response for why segregation is bad from you, I'm going to take it as you thinking it.

It's not like it's entirely devoid of merits. I mean, no one in New York really puts a gun to the heads of immigrants and zones them on where they should live. It's something people are very aware of what they're doing but they're doing it to be comfortable and around others like them. Others that need the same amenities, speak the same language, go to the same religious institutions, and possibly work in similar fields.

Plus as a visitor, it's pretty easy getting Chinese, Korean, Indian, Vietnamese, Japanese food and stuff when neighborhoods like Chinatown, Koreatown, Little India, Little Saigon, or Little Tokyo/Japantown exist.

Segregation and integration occurs in every city, different degrees? Sure. Look at all the ethnic enclaves New York and Los Angeles have, cant really say segregation has destroyed culture, when it's just given it a designated place in the city.

Last edited by Trafalgar Law; 12-26-2013 at 09:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-26-2013, 09:20 PM
 
349 posts, read 572,846 times
Reputation: 266
Pilsen has much nicer architecture and is more slanted towards the rest of the "GP" but Little Village is like the downtown for Chicago's Mexican community. It's literally the second largest retail district outside of downtown Chicago.

http://goo.gl/maps/lUqK3

Eastern Uptown and Edgewater is also a mix of everybody around the world. Many times neighborhood stats don't paint a complete picture because Broadway literally separates the non-immigrant parts from the immigrant areas. Nowadays the whole SW side is Latino, and don't forget the Eastern European/Ukrainian corridor on the NW Side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-26-2013, 09:37 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,498,822 times
Reputation: 5879
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John View Post
Yeah Devon is a pretty entry-level copy of a Mumbai street. Right down to the paan stains on the floor, paan is chewing tabacco that Indian people usually consume after lunch or dinner, at times. In the alleys or nearby park, around noon you can find a few families playing Cricket sometimes. Both in Chicago and Mumbai, Indian tourists or locals make the comparison of Lake Shore Drive to Marine Drive in Mumbai, which was inspired by Lake Shore Drive, as an urban thoroughfare along the waterfront.

Pilsen, is typically where people in Chicago go for Mexican or Salvadoran food. There's Chinatown in the Southside, and so on.

Well, asking a question isn't making an argument just yet. It was just to see what your opinion is on the matter and even though I didn't exactly get a response for why segregation is bad from you, I'm going to take it as you thinking it.

It's not like it's entirely devoid of merits. I mean, no one in New York really puts a gun to the heads of immigrants and zones them on where they should live. It's something people are very aware of what they're doing but they're doing it to be comfortable and around others like them. Others that need the same amenities, speak the same language, go to the same religious institutions, and possibly work in similar fields.

Plus as a visitor, it's pretty easy getting Chinese, Korean, Indian, Vietnamese, Japanese food and stuff when neighborhoods like Chinatown, Koreatown, Little India, Little Saigon, or Little Tokyo/Japantown exist.
For other religions and cultures it is often hard without a critical mass all in one area to have the establishments and products they need from whatever country they came from. It makes it easier to live in the area and keep all your traditions. I.E. they need to eat Kosher / Glatt Kosher / Halal / Jain / Dairy only restaurants, etc. open on certain religious holidays, not closed for others they don't celebrate etc...I mean is there really a market for 10 different kinds of baba ghanoush at Safeway? Is there a market for 20 different kinds of Indian rice at a Kroger? Fresh boxes of imported indian mangoes? You often need the critical mass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 05:52 PM
 
592 posts, read 827,934 times
Reputation: 259
I'm in nyc right now, Spanish Harlem to be exact. Much of the city has changed in the last 10 years. The nightlife here is far superior to SF or Chicago. But so far I still have to say that it seems you have a better chance of stumbling into a good or great restaurant in in SF than nyc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 06:41 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,498,822 times
Reputation: 5879
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFNative87 View Post
I'm in nyc right now, Spanish Harlem to be exact. Much of the city has changed in the last 10 years. The nightlife here is far superior to SF or Chicago. But so far I still have to say that it seems you have a better chance of stumbling into a good or great restaurant in in SF than nyc
Need to get out of SH maybe, there are definitely dead "foodie" zones, even in Manhattan. Definitely get yelp app or something. There are areas in Chelsea, village, soho, etc that are just lined restaurant after restaurant with great food. Walking around isn't really the best option, b/c Manhattan is pretty large...and you might not find what you are looking for. I.E. in some areas you might pass 10 italian and 5 chinese places, but you are looking for indian and you are out of luck...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,987,895 times
Reputation: 1088
Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetclimber View Post
SF is not in the same league as the other 2, not in the top 5 in any of those categories. LA and DC are far ahead as well as 1 or 2 others
What do you know about San Francisco? We are in a position of authority now that can stop this nation in its tracks. The SF Bay Area is a primate innovative dream machine. We have everything at our doorsteps. We are the most socially influential city since LA's 20-80's boom era.

Now we sit in a state with first class education capitals and a budget surplus. The SF Bay Area's GDP is growing faster than China. Our downtown hasn't been this hot ever. San Francisco defines the US growth potential IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-29-2013, 10:09 PM
 
1,612 posts, read 2,419,769 times
Reputation: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
What do you know about San Francisco? We are in a position of authority now that can stop this nation in its tracks. The SF Bay Area is a primate innovative dream machine. We have everything at our doorsteps. We are the most socially influential city since LA's 20-80's boom era.

Now we sit in a state with first class education capitals and a budget surplus. The SF Bay Area's GDP is growing faster than China. Our downtown hasn't been this hot ever. San Francisco defines the US growth potential IMO.
Are you making all these crazy assertions because of Silicon Valley?

You realize most of Silicon Valley isn't even in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area, right?

If we were to accept your statements at face value, then San Jose, which does contain Silicon Valley, would be the most powerful city in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 01:39 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,482,823 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrantiX View Post
The SF Bay Area's GDP is growing faster than China.
And the interesting part is, this is due to the SF MSA, not the SJ MSA.

Quote:
Our downtown hasn't been this hot ever.
Yes, SF is on fire.

Quote:
San Francisco defines the US growth potential IMO.
The Bay Area is a far reaching, global powerhouse whose trends and innovations are currently driving the world economy into the future, as we speak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 05:10 AM
 
555 posts, read 714,829 times
Reputation: 438
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiVegas View Post
Are you making all these crazy assertions because of Silicon Valley?

You realize most of Silicon Valley isn't even in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area, right?

If we were to accept your statements at face value, then San Jose, which does contain Silicon Valley, would be the most powerful city in the world.
They share the same CSA. SF is the center of the 5th largest concentration of people in the country. It isno pushover. In fact the SF CSA will likely surpass the Chicago CSA in the next twenty years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2013, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Nob Hill, San Francisco, CA
2,342 posts, read 3,987,895 times
Reputation: 1088
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichiVegas View Post
Are you making all these crazy assertions because of Silicon Valley?
San Francisco is the hottest city in SV right now. SV extends from DTSF to DTSJ.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top