Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In short, the nation's urban cores continue to lose domestic migrants with a vengeance, however are doing quite well at attracting international migration. Thus, core growth is not resulting from migration from suburbs or any other part of the nation, but is driven by international migration.
I think the idea is that there's been an inflection point with the urban cores having rebounded and the growth of the suburbs slowed, not necessarily that urban cores have started growing faster than the suburbs. Think accelerations and not velocities.
I think the idea is that there's been an inflection point with the urban cores having rebounded and the growth of the suburbs slowed, not necessarily that urban cores have started growing faster than the suburbs. Think accelerations and not velocities.
Certainly
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.