Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-09-2011, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Toronto
1,654 posts, read 5,853,802 times
Reputation: 861

Advertisements

Wow Philly looked impressive.

 
Old 01-09-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: West Cedar Park, Philadelphia
1,225 posts, read 2,566,511 times
Reputation: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThroatGuzzler View Post
Wow Philly looked impressive.
Whaddaya mean, looked?
 
Old 01-09-2011, 12:35 PM
 
Location: moving again
4,383 posts, read 16,760,626 times
Reputation: 1681
I can't help but feel like many cities had better skylines before the 50s and on.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Cleveland Suburbs
2,554 posts, read 6,900,018 times
Reputation: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billiam View Post
I can't help but feel like many cities had better skylines before the 50s and on.
Pretty much. Look at Detroit, that skyline was beautiful. Now you don't have near that density anymore.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Toronto
1,654 posts, read 5,853,802 times
Reputation: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billiam View Post
I can't help but feel like many cities had better skylines before the 50s and on.
And this is the case with Philly. I like their skyline much more back in the day than the present day. I just value older architecture to a greater degree and appreciate it more than modern day stuff. For example.. Toronto was extremely dense in the core, until the 60's rolled around and they began to demolish entire blocks of 19th century Victorians in favor of parking lots thanks to the rise of the automobile. That was taking a huge step backward, and I don't even think we've recovered from the losses today despite all the new construction.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Tampa - St. Louis
1,272 posts, read 2,180,851 times
Reputation: 2140
St. Louis circa long time ago

 
Old 01-09-2011, 01:59 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,933,707 times
Reputation: 7752
Houston circa 1950:




 
Old 01-09-2011, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
1,374 posts, read 3,253,668 times
Reputation: 872
CLEVELAND SKYLINE - CIRCA 1949



 
Old 01-09-2011, 04:39 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia,New Jersey, NYC!
6,963 posts, read 20,530,843 times
Reputation: 2737
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDBaumgardner View Post
CLEVELAND SKYLINE - CIRCA 1949



 
Old 01-09-2011, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Blue Ash, Ohio (Cincinnati)
2,785 posts, read 6,629,599 times
Reputation: 705
I actually like Cleveland better today. There are more talls. Plus the Terminal Tower complex is a bit more impressive today too.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top