Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I see this is an old thread but since it got bumped I thought I'd say something. I see that a few people rank Vegas fairly high. I lived in North Las Vegas from junior high through high school and unless you're on the strip or Fremont street there is nothing walkable about Vegas.
I change my mind. I'd say New Orleans, Charleston and Savannah. LA and other large urban sunbelt cities, like San Diego, Houston and Phoenix, may have walkable neighborhoods, but the entire city isn't really as walkable as the older ones. Also, not sure about Savannah or Charleston, but New Orleans has a pretty good public transportation system as well.
I change my mind. I'd say New Orleans, Charleston and Savannah. LA and other large urban sunbelt cities, like San Diego, Houston and Phoenix, may have walkable neighborhoods, but the entire city isn't really as walkable as the older ones. Also, not sure about Savannah or Charleston, but New Orleans has a pretty good public transportation system as well.
Cities like Houston wouldn't be bad if they would have kept the middle and upper class in the city. The infrastructure is there, is just lacks activity and population.
Cities like Houston wouldn't be bad if they would have kept the middle and upper class in the city. The infrastructure is there, is just lacks activity and population.
huh based what do you make that claim? have you been apt hunting in the city in the last five years? i have good luck trying to find a one bedroom for less
than 900 in the loop? and i profund confused about the lack of activty statement.
I change my mind. I'd say New Orleans, Charleston and Savannah. LA and other large urban sunbelt cities, like San Diego, Houston and Phoenix, may have walkable neighborhoods, but the entire city isn't really as walkable as the older ones. Also, not sure about Savannah or Charleston, but New Orleans has a pretty good public transportation system as well.
Savannah and Charleston are walkable in the core and immediate surrounding neighborhoods, but that's not characteristic of the entire cities. Once you get outside of those areas, you run into this:
Savannah and Charleston are walkable in the core and immediate surrounding neighborhoods, but that's not characteristic of the entire cities. Once you get outside of those areas, you run into this:
I agree, comparing nothing but the walkable sq miles LA, Atlanta, and Houston would have a much larger walkable area in the core than NOLA, Savannah, and Charleston.
I agree, comparing nothing but the walkable sq miles LA, Atlanta, and Houston would have a much larger walkable area in the core than NOLA, Savannah, and Charleston.
Well at the same time, NOLA, Charleston, and Savannah have more walkable areas given the sizes of their cities, and their cores and immediate neighborhoods comprise larger areas relative to the cities as a whole.
Well at the same time, NOLA, Charleston, and Savannah have more walkable areas given the sizes of their cities, and their cores and immediate neighborhoods comprise larger areas relative to the cities as a whole.
But if you're going by relative to the city's size/metro of course, but that's not comparing apples to apples.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
florida
