Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-05-2018, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,543,034 times
Reputation: 18814

Advertisements

Next to the Aztec, they are the 2nd ugliest mass produced vehicle out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-05-2018, 10:02 PM
 
5,479 posts, read 2,117,680 times
Reputation: 8109
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Next to the Aztec, they are the 2nd ugliest mass produced vehicle out there.
Don't forget about the even uglier HER (HHR).
Or the Nissan Joke (Juke)
Or the Scion Toaster (XB, or any Scion actually)
Or that new Honda Minivan that looks like a Hearse...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2018, 09:27 AM
 
2,211 posts, read 1,571,815 times
Reputation: 1668
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContraPagan View Post
I've owned one for 8 years. It's 13 years old and runs just fine, thank you very much. I have no complaints with it.
Phew! If it didn't look like a mini hirse or Chevy HHR, I might think about it.

But it's hideous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-07-2018, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Watervliet, NY
6,915 posts, read 3,946,747 times
Reputation: 12876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creamer1 View Post
Phew! If it didn't look like a mini hirse or Chevy HHR, I might think about it.

But it's hideous.
The Cruiser predates the HHR. HHR only dates from 2005.

The Cruiser has a retro look and that's why I wanted one. Mine's about to flip 153K miles, so it's been a real workhorse for me.
Attached Thumbnails
Anyone here that hates PT Cruisers?-05.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2018, 03:12 AM
 
166 posts, read 170,660 times
Reputation: 152
Hate the way it looks, otherwise it's a nice car. sorry if it hurts, but this car looks like someone tried to build a car from a boat - the PT reminds me of that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2018, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Removing a snake out of the neighbor's washing machine
3,095 posts, read 2,038,767 times
Reputation: 2305
My wife always said the back end of a PT resembled a toilet lid. But I have sat in a friend's, it's very roomy and I'm sure handles fine. If I came across a decent example with relatively low mileage and a sunroof, I'd sprint for it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2018, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
2,983 posts, read 3,089,832 times
Reputation: 4552
Here's mine, had it for 7 years from new:





One of the more versatile small cars I've ever had, and dead nuts reliable for those seven years (and I worked it hard, including a year of autocross racing with it). It's a 2002 Touring edition with the manual trans. almost 3 seconds quicker to 60 than the automatic version and a much more responsive driver. I love the mini-'37 Ford looks of it and the way the interior is completely configurable for storage is pretty slick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-18-2018, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Pikesville, MD
2,983 posts, read 3,089,832 times
Reputation: 4552
Quote:
Originally Posted by ContraPagan View Post
The Cruiser predates the HHR. HHR only dates from 2005.

Bob Lutz was head of Chrysler products when the PT was designed by Brian Nesbitt in 2000. Bob Lutz was head of GM product when the HHR was designed by... Brian Nesbitt in 2003. Interesting little factoid.


The PT was patterned after the '37 Ford, and the HHR was patterned after the '50 Suburban. Similar packaging and layout, though the HHR was a little tighter inside and not quite as configurable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 11:16 AM
 
Location: New Mexico via Ohio via Indiana
1,796 posts, read 2,228,978 times
Reputation: 2940
Quote:
Originally Posted by engineman View Post
A good friend had a PT and a Toyota Solara at the same time, both convertibles. He said the Toyota was a far better car than the PT. I sat in one in the showroom and found the space was quite good. At that time I needed an SUV to tow my camper, so it never went any further.

I like the styling better than the Chrysler convertible that I now have, but by then the PTs were long discontinued.
Always enjoyed my base model PT Cruiser as a convertible for basic use. Miss it still. It's not a Porsche 911, but it was still fun with the top down and on vacation. Always treated me well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2018, 06:13 PM
 
5,479 posts, read 2,117,680 times
Reputation: 8109
After being stuck behind two different PT Losers today, I'm beginning to hate them more...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive > Brand-specific forums > Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, and Ram
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top