Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-17-2011, 02:57 PM
 
16 posts, read 32,034 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements

I am dealing with Chicago's Zoning Dept for the first time in the permit process for a rehab and I'm beginning to feel uneasy.

They have now sent my architect away TWICE. They want to check this or that, they want to confirm this or that... I am trying to deconvert a 4 flat into a 3 flat, legally it is a 3 flat (and historically records show it was a 4 flat).

What is the deal? I have read blogs about the frustrations architects have with this dept. Are they just doing this because they enjoy torturing people, or do they really have some sort of unwritten mandate to just put people through the hoops to get their stamp of approval? What is it to them, anyhow? What motivates them to not simply say "hey, looks like you have proof that 3 units are legal, I'll be happy to stamp them".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2011, 05:42 PM
 
968 posts, read 2,669,010 times
Reputation: 431
Your alderman also plays a big part in zoning in your ward... you might want to have a chat with him/her if you feel you're getting the run around ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Chicago - Logan Square
3,396 posts, read 7,219,317 times
Reputation: 3731
Does your architect have any experience with this sort of thing? Reducing the number of units should be pretty easy. They'll almost always send you away once just to prove they're doing their job, but if everything is in order the second visit should be the last. What sort of things do they want checked or confirmed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2011, 08:07 PM
 
16 posts, read 32,034 times
Reputation: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attrill View Post
Does your architect have any experience with this sort of thing? Reducing the number of units should be pretty easy. They'll almost always send you away once just to prove they're doing their job, but if everything is in order the second visit should be the last. What sort of things do they want checked or confirmed?
^ My architect is experienced.

He actually seems pretty optimistic.

Just to be fair, the second "rejection" wasn't really a rejection. The Zoning guy told my architect that he wants to show the plans to his supervisor, and to come back Monday.

I find that odd, and kind of frustrating. If they have to show it to their supervisor, it suggests that they still see some kind of issue..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2011, 08:19 PM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,452,690 times
Reputation: 18729
Default You really ought to change your screen name...

Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician
...The Zoning guy told my architect that he wants to show the plans to his supervisor, and to come back Monday.

I find that odd, and kind of frustrating. If they have to show it to their supervisor, it suggests that they still see some kind of issue..
See in Chicago, and the vast majority of other large urban areas, the frontline workers in government offices are basically hacks. They got their jib becuase they knew somebody. Maybe their relatives took pity on their their lack of skill and sent a bankrolled some elections and as payback the got hired.

There are people with actual skills that also happen to work in government offices. Especially stuff that could ultimately result in an apartment fire during into a deathtrap or a porch collapsing and killing a dozen so drunk party goers. Thus the "supervisor" kinda has to sign off on anything that seems like life safety issues are potentially at risk.

Now if you were asking about the process of getting a purely economic thing (like a 4AM liquor license or remodeling a taco stand into a sit down resturant) then the issue becomes one of clout and "pay to play".


Really I would think any "urban politician" would know how the wheels of government gets greased in Chicago...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top