Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 11:08 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,754,394 times
Reputation: 23268

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
You do know that this isn't true, right?
Well, it might be a little over the top... but, not all that much here in California for some CALPERS members.

Here is a clip from the local newspaper for a police officer that made his way through the ranks and is retiring at 51 years after 29 1/2 years service (30 years credit due to applying unused sick leave and vacation)

"Kozicki's pension will be close to his budgeted salary of $187,351 because he will receive premiums for having a bachelor's degree and a Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training certificate"

What many forget is they also receive lifetime medical... it's easy to see the value of the total package easily exceeds yearly pay after a few years...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,251,763 times
Reputation: 7373
The problem we get into though is the odd specific story vs the statistical facts.

When looking at California state employee compensation, what is the mean salary, and what is the mean pension?

I think mean is more significant as a measuring tool than median, more accurately accounting for total cost.

Looking at total personnel cost though, it seems to be a reach to state that our state budget is having problems due to pensions. This would only be true if the LAO isn't fully presenting the personnel cost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:38 AM
 
8,674 posts, read 17,313,890 times
Reputation: 4686
Ultrarunner: What you have there is a worst-case scenario--the extreme exception, not the rule. Law enforcement officers' retirement is 3% a year that they worked, so they cap out at 90% after 30 years. Most state employees get 2% a year, so they cap out lower and it takes a longer time. People have taken the worst-case scenario to be the standard...typically state employees retire with about 40-50% of their base pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2010, 03:43 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,754,394 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
Ultrarunner: What you have there is a worst-case scenario--the extreme exception, not the rule. Law enforcement officers' retirement is 3% a year that they worked, so they cap out at 90% after 30 years. Most state employees get 2% a year, so they cap out lower and it takes a longer time. People have taken the worst-case scenario to be the standard...typically state employees retire with about 40-50% of their base pay.
Thank you for the explanation... I'm really far outside the circle of civil service except for a group of Law Enforcement friends I've know since High School...

Confidentially, most have said they had no idea the extent of total benefits a career in Law Enforcement provided at the time they signed up... it could also be a Bay Area California thing since wages tend towards the high side anyway.

It does make for interesting headlines... especially during these economic times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top