Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-13-2011, 03:03 PM
 
30 posts, read 132,978 times
Reputation: 31

Advertisements

Is that facility built to withstand something as devastating as Japan's failing nuclear plants?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-13-2011, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,667 posts, read 67,617,460 times
Reputation: 21258
That's an excellent question. I was just thinking the same thing.

I usually support the full use of nuclear power, but after this incident of Japan, Im not so sure anymore considering we are also prone to major earthquakes and now we know, tsunamis too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,667 posts, read 67,617,460 times
Reputation: 21258
And it looks like the Tsunami might not be the only problem we have to deal with respect to the recent natural events in Japan.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bVGpQRqsyo...Fukushima4.JPG
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,667 posts, read 67,617,460 times
Reputation: 21258
Just some more info on California's 2 nuclear power plants:
Quote:
Operating nuclear power plants in California are Diablo Canyon, near San Luis Obispo, [pictured in a PG&E photo to the right] and San Onofre, about midway between Los Angeles and San Diego. Nuclear units at both plants use ocean water for cooling.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) owns the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, which consists of two units. Unit 1 is a 1,073 megawatt (MW) PWR which began commercial operation in May 1985, while Unit 2 is a 1,087 MW PWR which began commercial operation in March 1986.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/8/110...109602f2_z.jpg

Southern California Edison Co. and San Diego Gas & Electric own the two operating units at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. Unit 2 is a 1,070 MW PWR that began commercial operation in August 1983, while Unit 3 is a 1,080 MW PWR that began commercial operation in April 1984.

http://taxdollars.ocregister.com/fil...onofre-air.jpg

http://www.energy.ca.gov/nuclear/california.html
So PG&E owns Diablo Canyon, and we already know they can't be trusted to maintain anything.

Edison and SDG&E own San Onofre.

I wonder how much oversight there is?

So

Last edited by 18Montclair; 03-13-2011 at 04:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Pluto's Home Town
9,982 posts, read 13,777,779 times
Reputation: 5691
A very good question!!!!

From what I saw in the Japanese videos, they should be shut down NOW. That tsunami crushed and carried way buildings like they were made of toilet paper. The power of such a mass of water just blew my mind. Both these reactors would be toast in such an event, and due to the prevailing winds fallout would be carried over millions of people across the whole US. It is amazing to see how exposed we can be to risk.

I don't blame anyone, because this was probably not obvious until we saw the true power of those waves. As opposed to New Orleans, which was patently obvious for decades.

Let's get smarter about these things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 06:23 PM
 
Location: The High Seas
7,371 posts, read 16,032,967 times
Reputation: 11869
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And it looks like the Tsunami might not be the only problem we have to deal with respect to the recent natural events in Japan.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bVGpQRqsyo...Fukushima4.JPG
Makes one want to say: "fuku shima".

How many rads are safe? How rad are rads?

Eat lots of apples. Apples are good for ya!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2011, 08:36 PM
 
Location: Floyd Co, VA
3,513 posts, read 6,384,431 times
Reputation: 7628
For what it's worth - my brother had a very good friend who worked on the construction of the plant and he was a fanatic that things be done with as much precision as humanly possible - he didn't want his family living with a poorly built plant nearby. He was not the guy in charge of the whole thing but what he did have control over was done right. Is it well enough engineered? Who knows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 02:10 AM
 
282 posts, read 618,962 times
Reputation: 389
It would be nice to see tidal hydroelectric power used in those areas instead. Not sure if that would generate enough juice though?
I feel that nuclear is always kind of a potential disaster waiting to happen,especially right on or near active and powerful faults lines. I am not an engineer by any means, but think that building a nuclear power plant A: right on the ocean and B: right on or near a fault line or C: both, is really stupid . But nuclear is generally safe,with no incidence and provides a lot of energy. I think we could do better and do more with solar & hydro power,but hey,what do I know
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 07:42 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 8,006,934 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
And it looks like the Tsunami might not be the only problem we have to deal with respect to the recent natural events in Japan.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bVGpQRqsyo...Fukushima4.JPG
This is nonsense. There isn't going to be a major radioactive release like this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2011, 09:09 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,667 posts, read 67,617,460 times
Reputation: 21258
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
This is nonsense. There isn't going to be a major radioactive release like this.
Your probably right. I just found this scary graphic and decided to post it. LOL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top