Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Favorite Plane
Airbus A320 0 0%
Airbus A330 0 0%
Airbus A380 3 8.11%
Boeing 737 1 2.70%
Boeing 747 2 5.41%
Boeing 757 6 16.22%
Boeing 767 2 5.41%
Boeing 777 6 16.22%
Boeing 787 2 5.41%
Embraer 190 0 0%
MD-80 1 2.70%
MD-88 0 0%
MD-90 1 2.70%
Other: Please Specify 12 32.43%
I Dont Care 1 2.70%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Arizona, The American Southwest
54,494 posts, read 33,856,055 times
Reputation: 91679

Advertisements

The story of this airplane has always intrigued me. July of 1983, this Air Canada Boeing 767-200 started experiencing low fuel pressure at 41,000 feet on one of the engines. They began descending and it ran out of fuel completely at 26,000 feet, then the flight crew glided it down into an airfield that was formerly used the by the Canadian Air Force. There was minor damage, but it was repaired and it continued flying until it was retired in January of 2008. It was also given the nickname "The Gimli Glider" after the name of the field it was landed on. Only a few minor injuries occurred and I believe they were a result of the evacuation not the rough landing.

Gimli Glider - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2014, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Arizona, The American Southwest
54,494 posts, read 33,856,055 times
Reputation: 91679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snort View Post
Any one that doesn't crash.....thank you very much!
Crashes only occur because of mistakes, for the most part, mechanical failures that were the cause of crashes were caused by faulty maintenance procedures.

You're probably familiar with the statistics and you probably heard that you are much more likely to get involved in an auto accident on the way to the airport than you do travelling to your destination on an airplane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 10:27 AM
 
3,491 posts, read 6,970,756 times
Reputation: 1741
Southwest Airlines 737s
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,422,866 times
Reputation: 10110
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace105 View Post
With today's technology, bigger and newer planes are coming out every year. What is your personal favorite to fly on?

A car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
2,098 posts, read 3,523,134 times
Reputation: 998
757 all the way. Especially with the retirements, makes me sad. 767 and 777 also great.

Could care less about 737, M80, 727 etc. A320 is a nice machine but feels like a paper airplane in turbulence. I still like it though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Living on the Coast in Oxnard CA
16,289 posts, read 32,330,688 times
Reputation: 21891
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Striving for Avalon
1,431 posts, read 2,479,708 times
Reputation: 3451
A380 or A330 in business or first.

Prior to living in Australia and travelling to Asia from there, I had never had much of an opportunity to fly the 330 living in the US and the UK while frequently flying between the two. Up front, it's a nice ride. It's not so big that the biz cabin feels like a flying dormitory, and the plane is relatively quiet up there.

To date, I've flown in 330s operated by Cathay Pacific and Malaysian Airlines. Next week, I'll try out a brand new one operated by Fiji Airways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2014, 03:07 PM
 
Location: North West Northern Ireland.
20,633 posts, read 23,867,312 times
Reputation: 3107
I don't like airbuses. They look unattractive, particularly at the front.

I haven't flown on any widebody's but I would hope my first one will not be an Airbus!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2014, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Northern Virginia
40 posts, read 47,397 times
Reputation: 29
I like all boeings, but I voted for the 777 because is has the most "comfy" ride. All he boeings are good. I want to fly on a 787 soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2014, 02:07 PM
 
Location: NM-CR
325 posts, read 576,530 times
Reputation: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by ace105 View Post
With today's technology, bigger and newer planes are coming out every year. What is your personal favorite to fly on?
Jets? 727, 707
Turbos? C130, Electra, Dash7
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top