Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-20-2013, 11:39 AM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,753,972 times
Reputation: 3869

Advertisements

for 1970 CR's purchased a Plymouth Fury with a 383 V8 and a heavy duty suspension. they were impressed with how the HD suspension improved ride and handling over the 1969 Fury (which did not have the HD suspension). as a result the Fury equalled its competitors(GM and Ford) in ride comfort and equalled the Impala for handling responsiveness

for 1971 the Fury was not equipped with the HD suspension. tho it had a big car ride under light load, it's full load ride was no better than the ride of some subcompacts and compacts. so CR's concluded that the Fury for 1971 did not make the grade as a 6 passenger car with the standard suspension

for '72 with standard suspension the full load ride was a bit better than 71 but still below par for a large car

for 73 the Fury rode smoothly under light load but no better than the 72 under full load. to be sure they check tested a similar Fury with a HD suspension. this improved the ride quality but caused "rear axle hop" during braking, so CR's advised against ordering the car with a HD suspension for 1973

has anyone owned cars decades ago with a HD suspension that caused this "rear axle hop"? I wonder if it's just an annoyance during braking or could it be dangerous?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2013, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Wichita Falls Texas
1,009 posts, read 1,995,491 times
Reputation: 1008
My 76 Maverick has factory HD suspension. Compared to my standard suspension Mavericks, mine have less axle hop over bumps. I also can corner faster with less lean. But there is more choppiness over standard pavement ripples and expansion strips. I had a 79 Thunderbird also with factory HD suspension that was a little more stiff riding than my current 79 with standard suspension, but not as much as my Mavericks which make sense because the unsprung weight of the T-Bird is much higher than the lighter Maverick. Of course the sprung weight of a solid rear axle will cause higher forces than a lighter independent suspension set up. None of my cars have any axle hop under braking, even with all wheels locked up. That's never been a problem. Did the 73 fury have belted bias ply's or radials? That would make a difference because of the stiffer bias ply sidewalls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 07:01 PM
 
12,115 posts, read 33,753,972 times
Reputation: 3869
the 73 Fury brochure says it has steel belted radials
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top