Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2012, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
1,050 posts, read 1,690,895 times
Reputation: 498

Advertisements

Atlanta City Council votes for 50 percent pay increase | www.ajc.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2012, 06:06 AM
 
2,530 posts, read 4,772,114 times
Reputation: 2053
Definitely not 20% in one year and 300% over a 12 year period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 06:18 AM
 
1,858 posts, read 3,550,218 times
Reputation: 1184
hell no but georgia is a republican state so what do you expect
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 06:28 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
1,050 posts, read 1,690,895 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by DONNIEANDDONNA417 View Post
hell no but georgia is a republican state so what do you expect
You do realize the city is majority Democrat?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Pisgah Forest
145 posts, read 361,476 times
Reputation: 226
Food for thought: My council person works nights and weekends all the time, and weekdays of course. She takes calls constantly, gets emails constantly. People are always complaining constantly and asking for things constantly. She has to be nice/cooperative with people who are angry, rude, and crazy every day. I have seen her get yelled at time and again by the nutcases that show up at neighborhood meetings. If any of you go to neighborhood meetings and NPU meetings etc then you know there are always the crazy people that yell about everything. And she has to do a lot of work that covers a lot of different areas of expertise. Even without the nutty whiners, her job is very demanding and open-ended.

At least in my District, my council member is doing a great job, works more hours than most people I know, and has to do a job that I am certain 99% of the rest of us could NOT do as well as she does. I say she deserves a LOT MORE than what she will get if they get this pay raise. I hope they get it, and I hope it attracts more quality people like her to the job...from what I see, quite a lot of these council members who get voted in for decades have done nothing good for their constituents.

Part of the reason more "good hard working people" who could do good for the City do not run for these positions is because the pay is lousy. It is the main reason why I never even considered it...because I KNOW that to REALLY do a good job as a council person, I would not be able to work another full time job, I would not have time. So, my council salary would have to cover all of my expenses, and I could barely even afford my basic bills on what they make now, and I own a very modest 2 bedroom 1 bath home and drive a modest 6 year old car. If salaries get up there to 60K, more people who could do a lot of good for this City would run for office, and we would get way, way, way more than our money's worth out of that. Right now some of those people are a total waste of our money. Higher salaries would get some quality people to run against these decades long benchwarmers who actually harm their districts.

As for the city employees...with the exception of the police and fire, what I see when I go Downtown and what I see when they are "working" in the community is that they do no deserve a raise. They need to fire about half of them, and get the remaining half to do what they are supposed to do, and at that point three times the job would be getting done as what is getting done now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 08:00 AM
 
1,114 posts, read 2,349,388 times
Reputation: 702
I find myself little torn about it. Sure a 50% raise sounds like a lot but they're being paid like 40k right now. If it's a PT job, that's pretty sweet but if it's your only source of income, it's a pretty cruddy job especially when you factor the costs of getting into office. I would think most people treat it as a stepping stone to bigger political offices but a lot of those folks this is the most they'll ever achieve. Obviously in tight fiscal times, you want to minimize cost increases and share the burden of belt tightening so the way they went about it certainly seems very tone deaf.

Money shouldn't be the sole driver of taking political office but power has always had corrosive effects. There are generally far easier ways to get paid a lot more but I'm guessing most people that have ambitions for office are more attracted to power than pure financial gain. The avg manager in my firm makes more than Kaseem Reed and no one is going to give any of them that level of executive power. Paying politicians next to nothing of course invites those who seek to enrich themselves in other ways. See Gwinnett County for a case study in how secondary costs (overpaying for land, lawsuits, etc) can strip away anything penny pinching saved you up front. That said, there's little rhyme or reason in politician pay other than how much they think they can get away with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 08:05 AM
 
Location: midtown mile area, Atlanta GA
1,228 posts, read 2,389,086 times
Reputation: 1792
It's hard to just justify when the streets look like a bomb has pockmarked them. The neighboorhood streets are awful-including those in places like ansley park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 08:07 AM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,872,781 times
Reputation: 3435
Yes, They should be paid enough to not need to work a second job.

However, the system is flawed. They should not be in charge of setting their own salaries. Maybe lock it to Atlanta's average income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,242 posts, read 6,237,327 times
Reputation: 2783
Is walmart and fuqua not already taking care of these guys?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2012, 09:33 AM
 
1,858 posts, read 3,550,218 times
Reputation: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgiaLakeSearch View Post
You do realize the city is majority Democrat?
Well Romney won the state of georgia so doesnt that mean it is majority republican?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top