Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


White Deer Elementary School in White Deer, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57
Address
 603 S MAIN
White Deer, TX 79097
Telephone
(806) 883-2311
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
57
Students
216
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
17.3
Free lunch eligible students
91
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
18
School district
WHITE DEER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
PANHANDLE J H (13.2 miles):

93
PANHANDLE EL (13.2 miles):

81
PANHANDLE H S (13.1 miles):

75
SPRING CREEK SCHOOL (9.7 miles):

70
White Deer Elementary School:

57
WHITE DEER H S (0.2 miles):

49
LAMAR EL (12.5 miles):

46
GRANDVIEW-HOPKINS EL (12.5 miles):

39
P L C-PAMPA LEARNING CTR (13.2 miles):

30
White Deer Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Carson County:

69
White Deer:

53
White Deer Elementary School:

57

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 216
Enrollment in 2015: 227
Enrollment in 2014: 278
Enrollment in 2013: 287
Enrollment in 2012: 276
Enrollment in 2011: 269
Enrollment in 2010: 263
Enrollment in 2009: 277
Enrollment in 2008: 269
Enrollment in 2007: 281
Enrollment in 2006: 290
Enrollment in 2005: 279
Enrollment in 2004: 241
Enrollment in 2003: 259
Enrollment in 2002: 227
Enrollment in 2001: 197
Enrollment in 2000: 202
Enrollment in 1999: 220

White Deer Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students2724292423312731216
Female students1312131413191215111
Male students1412161010121516105
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - 1 - - - - - 1
Hispanic students3442246227
White students2420242221262129187
Two or More Races students - - - - - 1 - - 1

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 27
Kindergarten enrollment: 24
1st grade enrollment: 29
2nd grade enrollment: 24
3rd grade enrollment: 23
4th grade enrollment: 31
5th grade enrollment: 27
6th grade enrollment: 31

White Deer Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 111 (51.4%)
White Deer Elementary School:

51.4%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 105 (48.6%)
Here:

48.6%
Texas:

50.1%

White Deer Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
Here:

0.5%
State:

0.4%
Hispanic enrollment: 27 (12.5%)
White Deer Elementary School:

12.5%
State:

46.9%
White enrollment: 187 (86.6%)
White Deer Elementary School:

86.6%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.5%)
White Deer Elementary School:

0.5%
Texas:

2.1%

White Deer Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 109 (50.5%)
School:

50.5%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 91 (42.1%)
Here:

42.1%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 18 (8.3%)
White Deer Elementary School:

8.3%
State:

6.2%

White Deer Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 17.3

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 9

Student/Teacher Ratio
White Deer Elementary School:

12.5
State:

15.6

White Deer Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $845,482
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 15.3 (Salary Expenditures: $664,723)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $6,252)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $65,206)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $109,299)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $82,930
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $952,273
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $763,044
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5.9 (Salary Expenditures: $189,229)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $189,229)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $109,299)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $125,037

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
  • White: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
White Deer Elementary School:

6.9%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
White Deer Elementary School:

17.4%
Texas:

4.1%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
White Deer Elementary School:

9.3
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,488
  • Males1,467
  • Females1,512
  • Hispanic1,487
  • White1,477
Math Average Scale Score:

1,488
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 33
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 33

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

18%
27%
34%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
22%
39%
17%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 53%, Masters: 20%)
13%
14%
53%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,487, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 57%, Masters: 0%)
43%
57%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 21%)
25%
25%
29%
21%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,463
  • Males1,422
  • Females1,511
  • Hispanic1,460
  • White1,468
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,463
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 33
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 33

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

15%
37%
21%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,422, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 22%)
22%
45%
11%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
7%
26%
34%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,460, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
14%
29%
28%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,468, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 29%)
17%
33%
21%
29%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,616
  • Males1,648
  • Females1,587
  • White1,613
Math Average Scale Score:

1,616
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 27
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

7%
26%
26%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,648, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 54%)
31%
15%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 29%)
14%
22%
35%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 42%)
8%
29%
21%
42%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,595
  • Males1,584
  • Females1,606
  • White1,588
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,595
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 27
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 37%

4%
29%
30%
37%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 38%)
8%
30%
24%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 36%)
29%
35%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 33%)
4%
33%
30%
33%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,941
  • Males3,930
  • Females3,951
  • White3,890
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,941
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 28
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 28

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.8 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 13 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

25%
21%
43%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,930, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 8%)
23%
23%
46%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,951, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 13%)
27%
20%
40%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,890, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 8%)
28%
24%
40%
8%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,655
  • Males1,656
  • Females1,655
  • White1,658
Math Average Scale Score:

1,655
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 28
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 28

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

4%
25%
42%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 23%)
31%
46%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 33%)
7%
20%
40%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 32%)
4%
24%
40%
32%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,592
  • Males1,590
  • Females1,594
  • White1,585
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,592
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 28
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 28

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

7%
32%
40%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
15%
23%
31%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 13%)
40%
47%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,585, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 16%)
8%
32%
44%
16%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,817
  • Males3,917
  • Females3,730
  • White3,796
Science Average Scale Score:

3,817
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 28
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 28

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

25%
36%
32%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,917, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 15%)
23%
23%
39%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,730, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 0%)
27%
46%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,796, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 4%)
28%
36%
32%
4%

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,640
  • Males1,617
  • Females1,656
  • White1,646
Math Average Scale Score:

1,640
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 27
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.9 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 37%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

19%
37%
37%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,617, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 0%)
27%
37%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
13%
38%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 10%)
19%
29%
42%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,603
  • Males1,598
  • Females1,606
  • White1,609
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,603
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 27
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

11%
41%
33%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,598, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 9%)
9%
36%
46%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,606, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 19%)
13%
44%
25%
19%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 14%)
10%
38%
38%
14%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 2
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 1
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
White Deer Elementary School:

18.5
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,259 schools)

Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 1

7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 4 (all female)
  • White: 4
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passed
Here:

57.1%
State:

85.3%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss White Deer, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents