Three Rivers Elementary School in Three Rivers, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 35
- Address
- 105 S SCHOOL RD
Three Rivers, TX 78071
- Telephone
- (361) 786-3603
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.trisd.org
- City-data.com school rating
- 35
- Students
- 396
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 31.1
- Free lunch eligible students
- 211
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 54
- School district
- THREE RIVERS ISD
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
GEORGE WEST PRI (9.3 miles): | 81 |
GEORGE WEST J H (9.4 miles): | 77 |
PAWNEE EL / J H (17.0 miles): | 76 |
GEORGE WEST H S (9.6 miles): | 53 |
GEORGE WEST EL (9.5 miles): | 50 |
Three Rivers Elementary School: | 35 |
THREE RIVERS JR/SR H S (0.2 miles): | 32 |
Three Rivers Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas: | 54 |
Live Oak County: | 55 |
Three Rivers: | 34 |
Three Rivers Elementary School: | 35 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 396
Enrollment in 2015: 419
Enrollment in 2014: 360
Enrollment in 2013: 311
Enrollment in 2012: 310
Enrollment in 2011: 283
Enrollment in 2010: 306
Enrollment in 2009: 276
Enrollment in 2008: 271
Enrollment in 2007: 259
Enrollment in 2006: 292
Enrollment in 2005: 281
Enrollment in 2004: 311
Enrollment in 2003: 339
Enrollment in 2002: 335
Enrollment in 2001: 329
Enrollment in 2000: 349
Enrollment in 1999: 354
Enrollment in 2015: 419
Enrollment in 2014: 360
Enrollment in 2013: 311
Enrollment in 2012: 310
Enrollment in 2011: 283
Enrollment in 2010: 306
Enrollment in 2009: 276
Enrollment in 2008: 271
Enrollment in 2007: 259
Enrollment in 2006: 292
Enrollment in 2005: 281
Enrollment in 2004: 311
Enrollment in 2003: 339
Enrollment in 2002: 335
Enrollment in 2001: 329
Enrollment in 2000: 349
Enrollment in 1999: 354
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | PK | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | G06 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All students | 30 | 46 | 53 | 56 | 61 | 53 | 43 | 54 | 396 |
Female students | 14 | 15 | 22 | 32 | 36 | 26 | 20 | 26 | 191 |
Male students | 16 | 31 | 31 | 24 | 25 | 27 | 23 | 28 | 205 |
Asian students | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 2 |
Hispanic students | 19 | 27 | 29 | 26 | 24 | 29 | 23 | 36 | 213 |
Black students | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
White students | 11 | 19 | 23 | 30 | 36 | 23 | 19 | 18 | 179 |
Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 30
Kindergarten enrollment: 46
1st grade enrollment: 53
2nd grade enrollment: 56
3rd grade enrollment: 61
4th grade enrollment: 53
5th grade enrollment: 43
6th grade enrollment: 54
Kindergarten enrollment: 46
1st grade enrollment: 53
2nd grade enrollment: 56
3rd grade enrollment: 61
4th grade enrollment: 53
5th grade enrollment: 43
6th grade enrollment: 54
Three Rivers Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 191 (48.2%)
School: | 48.2% |
Texas: | 49.0% |
Male enrollment: 205 (51.8%)
Here: | 51.8% |
Texas: | 50.1% |
Three Rivers Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
Here: | 0.5% |
Texas: | 3.1% |
Hispanic enrollment: 213 (53.8%)
Three Rivers Elementary School: | 53.8% |
Texas: | 46.9% |
Black enrollment: 2 (0.5%)
School: | 0.5% |
Texas: | 11.6% |
White enrollment: 179 (45.2%)
School: | 45.2% |
State: | 32.3% |
Three Rivers Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 265 (66.9%)
School: | 66.9% |
State: | 61.6% |
Free lunch eligible students: 211 (53.3%)
Here: | 53.3% |
State: | 55.4% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 54 (13.6%)
Three Rivers Elementary School: | 13.6% |
Texas: | 6.2% |
Three Rivers Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 31.1
Student/Teacher Ratio
Student/Teacher Ratio
School: | 12.7 |
State: | 15.6 |
Three Rivers Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,277,714
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 31.1 (Salary Expenditures: $1,941,321)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $101,644)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $30,595)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $11,454,844)
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $246,788
- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,941,321
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $101,644)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $30,595)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $114,548)
Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 36 (male: 26, female: 10)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 29 (male: 19, female: 10)
- White: 7 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
Retention:
Show data for
(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (all male)
Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
Percent of 1st grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (all female)
Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 5th grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 6th grade students retained
- Hispanic: 2
- White: 2
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here: | 8.7% |
State: | 5.3% |
- Hispanic2
- White4
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 1st grade
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Percent of 1st grade students retained
Here: | 11.3% |
Texas: | 6.3% |
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (all female)
- Hispanic: 2
- White: 2
Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School: | 7.1% |
State: | 4.8% |
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Here: | 9.8% |
Texas: | 4.3% |
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all female)
- Hispanic: 2
Percent of 5th grade students retained
Three Rivers Elementary School: | 4.7% |
State: | 4.8% |
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all female)
- White: 2
Percent of 6th grade students retained
School: | 3.7% |
State: | 4.1% |
Gifted and Talented:
Show data for
(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
- Hispanic19
- Asian2
- White22
- Multirace2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- White: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here: | 113.6 |
State: | 79.4 |
Statewide Student Assessments
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for
(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade
Math students tested: 47
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 47
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%
Reading students tested: 47
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 47
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%
4th Grade
Math students tested: 49
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%
Reading students tested: 49
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%
Writing students tested: 49
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Writing Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%
5th Grade
Math students tested: 52
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 52
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 52%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
Reading students tested: 52
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 52
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%
Science students tested: 53
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 54
Science Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%
6th Grade
Math students tested: 46
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 46
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%
Reading students tested: 46
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 46
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%
- All1,492
- Males1,491
- Females1,492
- Hispanic1,512
- White1,478
Math Average Scale Score
(3rd Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,492 |
Texas: | 1,453 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 47
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
- Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
- Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (71%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 38%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 17%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 22%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 29%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 10%)
- All1,468
- Males1,476
- Females1,460
- Hispanic1,462
- White1,476
Reading Average Scale Score
(3rd Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,468 |
Texas: | 1,423 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 47
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
- Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
- Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (70%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,460, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 13%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 21%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
4th Grade
- All1,504
- Males1,507
- Females1,500
- Hispanic1,499
- White1,509
Math Average Scale Score
(4th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,504 |
Texas: | 1,546 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (56%)
- Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (56%)
- Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
- Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (61%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,500, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 12%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 22%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,509, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
- All1,483
- Males1,481
- Females1,485
- Hispanic1,477
- White1,490
Reading Average Scale Score
(4th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,483 |
State: | 1,496 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
- Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (59%)
- Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (62%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,485, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 8%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 7%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 14%)
- All3,595
- Males3,456
- Females3,728
- Hispanic3,639
- White3,541
Writing Average Scale Score
(4th Grade)
Writing Average Scale Score: | 3,595 |
State: | 3,570 |
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 49
Writing Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (43%)
- Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (46%)
- Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (64%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,456, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,728, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 12%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,639, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 11%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,541, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
5th Grade
- All1,550
- Males1,583
- Females1,523
- Hispanic1,545
- White1,556
Math Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,550 |
Texas: | 1,603 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 52
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (56%)
- Reporting Category 2: 9.4 (55%)
- Reporting Category 3: 5.1 (57%)
- Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (54%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 52%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 17%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,523, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 3%, Masters: 7%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 15%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 8%)
- All1,546
- Males1,568
- Females1,529
- Hispanic1,498
- White1,598
Reading Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,546 |
State: | 1,546 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 52
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
- Reporting Category 2: 10.4 (65%)
- Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (64%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 22%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 17%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,498, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 7%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,598, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 32%)
- All3,793
- Males3,930
- Females3,679
- Hispanic3,649
- White3,942
Science Average Scale Score
(5th Grade)
Science Average Scale Score: | 3,793 |
Texas: | 3,771 |
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 54
Science Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
- Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (68%)
- Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
- Reporting Category 4: 8.6 (72%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,930, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 8%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,679, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 7%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,649, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 4%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,942, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 12%)
6th Grade
- All1,659
- Males1,677
- Females1,640
- Hispanic1,624
- White1,664
Math Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,659 |
Texas: | 1,546 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 46
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (56%)
- Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (57%)
- Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (60%)
- Reporting Category 4: 4.6 (65%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,677, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 26%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 13%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 10%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,664, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 22%)
- All1,523
- Males1,496
- Females1,550
- Hispanic1,480
- White1,559
Reading Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,523 |
Texas: | 1,457 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 46
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (58%)
- Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (65%)
- Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (48%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 2%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 61%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 0%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 4%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,480, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 4%)
Health & Safety
Suspensions:
Show data for
(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 16 (male: 12, female: 4)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
- Hispanic: 2
- White: 2
- Two or More Races: 2
Discuss Three Rivers, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: