All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Reno, NV Procter R Hug High School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
Procter R Hug High School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
4 .
Address:
Principal: Andrew E. Kelly
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 333-5300
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 333-5312
Website: www.washoe.k12.nv.us
Title I School: Yes
AYP School Designation: Watch
Special Programs: Homework Help Centers: Yes
Other nearby schools ratings: Procter R Hug High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Washoe County:
47Reno:
46Procter R Hug High School:
4
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Black:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
99.7%Hispanic:
99.5%All Students:
99.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
99.1%Two or more Races:
98.2%Individual Education Plan Students:
97.6%White:
97.1%
Percent Proficient Two or more Races:
67.9%White:
64.3%All Students:
59.3%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
59.3%Hispanic:
58.5%Limited English Proficiency Students:
54.2%Individual Education Plan Students:
14.8%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Hispanic:
100.0%Black:
100.0%White:
100.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.7%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
99.7%Two or more Races:
96.4%
Percent Proficient Two or more Races:
89.3%All Students:
80.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
80.0%Hispanic:
78.7%White:
76.2%Limited English Proficiency Students:
74.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
56.5%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Watch
Pacific Islander:
94.7%Two or more Races:
91.3%Limited English Proficiency Students:
90.8%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
90.6%Individual Education Plan Students:
89.1%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Language Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 337 54.5% 33.4% 27.9% 26.5% 13.3% 22.8% 4.2% 17.2% Male 202 60.0% 40.9% 28.9% 25.9% 9.4% 19.7% 1.7% 13.5% Female 155 44.7% 25.8% 31.2% 27.2% 18.4% 26.1% 5.7% 21.0% American Indian 10 50.0% 38.5% 40.0% 30.6% 10.0% 17.8% 0.0% 13.1% Asian 38 34.2% 20.2% 31.6% 24.1% 23.7% 27.7% 10.5% 28.1% Black 32 66.7% 46.1% 23.3% 28.1% 6.7% 17.8% 3.3% 8.0% White 55 44.0% 23.4% 22.0% 25.3% 24.0% 27.2% 10.0% 24.0% Individual Education Plan Students 47 86.8% 80.0% 13.2% 15.4% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 102 51.6% 32.9% 33.3% 33.7% 15.1% 22.7% 0.0% 10.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 192 56.5% 46.7% 28.2% 28.2% 11.2% 17.3% 4.1% 7.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 314 50.2% 33.9% 31.2% 26.0% 16.1% 22.4% 2.5% 17.7% Male 184 60.0% 47.2% 22.5% 28.1% 15.0% 16.5% 2.5% 8.2% Female 128 36.4% 26.1% 43.2% 26.5% 17.8% 25.5% 2.5% 21.9% Asian 31 39.1% 21.6% 34.8% 24.5% 17.4% 27.7% 8.7% 26.3% Black 30 63.0% 49.0% 25.9% 27.3% 11.1% 15.4% 0.0% 8.4% White 71 39.7% 24.7% 33.3% 24.6% 19.0% 26.5% 7.9% 24.1% Individual Education Plan Students 60 90.6% 79.8% 3.8% 15.8% 5.7% 3.2% 0.0% 1.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 46 95.1% 78.3% 4.9% 16.2% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0% 1.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 50.6% 46.5% 31.0% 28.2% 16.7% 17.2% 1.8% 8.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 315 55.8% 33.9% 25.3% 26.1% 13.7% 22.2% 5.3% 17.7% Male 166 64.2% 41.3% 22.3% 25.4% 11.5% 19.3% 2.0% 13.9% Female 149 46.7% 26.3% 28.5% 26.8% 16.1% 25.2% 8.8% 21.6% Asian 33 41.9% 20.7% 19.4% 24.6% 25.8% 27.0% 12.9% 27.7% Hispanic 177 59.1% 48.3% 25.0% 27.4% 12.8% 15.8% 3.0% 8.5% Black 29 65.2% 48.0% 21.7% 25.8% 13.0% 17.1% 0.0% 9.1% White 70 50.8% 24.5% 30.2% 25.6% 9.5% 26.3% 9.5% 23.6% Individual Education Plan Students 67 93.4% 81.4% 6.6% 15.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 51 93.8% 79.2% 6.3% 15.4% 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 1.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 187 56.0% 48.4% 27.4% 28.3% 13.1% 15.9% 3.6% 7.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 290 52.9% 34.5% 29.6% 25.5% 12.9% 21.8% 4.6% 18.2% Male 161 58.1% 42.4% 28.4% 25.0% 11.6% 18.7% 1.9% 13.9% Female 129 46.4% 26.3% 31.2% 26.1% 14.4% 25.0% 8.0% 22.6% Asian 28 52.0% 21.6% 28.0% 24.7% 16.0% 26.7% 4.0% 27.0% Hispanic 172 61.2% 50.9% 28.2% 25.7% 8.2% 15.2% 2.4% 8.1% Black 25 60.9% 48.2% 30.4% 26.7% 4.3% 16.5% 4.3% 8.6% White 58 26.8% 24.9% 35.7% 25.1% 26.8% 25.7% 10.7% 24.3% Individual Education Plan Students 57 92.0% 80.7% 6.0% 15.3% 2.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 44 90.7% 77.7% 7.0% 17.3% 2.3% 3.8% 0.0% 1.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 197 53.7% 50.0% 30.0% 27.9% 13.2% 15.7% 3.2% 6.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 326 55.7% 33.9% 24.6% 24.7% 14.8% 24.5% 4.9% 16.9% Male 166 60.6% 41.7% 26.7% 24.7% 9.1% 20.8% 3.6% 12.8% Female 160 50.6% 25.7% 22.5% 24.7% 20.6% 28.4% 6.3% 21.2% Asian 26 46.2% 22.3% 15.4% 24.5% 23.1% 29.4% 15.4% 23.9% Hispanic 144 60.8% 50.1% 25.2% 26.8% 11.9% 16.0% 2.1% 7.1% Black 35 57.1% 48.8% 31.4% 25.5% 8.6% 18.4% 2.9% 7.3% White 107 49.5% 24.9% 25.2% 23.6% 18.7% 29.0% 6.5% 22.5% Individual Education Plan Students 60 91.5% 80.4% 8.5% 14.6% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 1.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 54 84.9% 78.0% 13.2% 18.0% 1.9% 3.2% 0.0% 0.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 139 60.9% 49.0% 21.0% 28.4% 13.8% 16.7% 4.3% 5.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Mathematics Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 337 51.9% 35.8% 29.8% 26.0% 11.2% 21.4% 7.1% 16.8% Male 202 57.9% 37.2% 29.5% 23.2% 7.7% 20.9% 4.9% 18.7% Female 155 50.0% 34.3% 35.4% 28.9% 7.6% 22.1% 6.9% 14.8% American Indian 10 50.0% 39.1% 30.0% 30.7% 20.0% 19.8% 0.0% 10.4% Asian 38 42.1% 22.3% 31.6% 25.6% 15.8% 24.7% 10.5% 27.5% Black 32 55.2% 55.1% 20.7% 25.7% 17.2% 13.9% 6.9% 5.3% White 55 36.5% 25.2% 34.6% 24.7% 15.4% 26.1% 13.5% 24.1% Individual Education Plan Students 47 85.0% 77.2% 12.5% 16.2% 2.5% 4.8% 0.0% 1.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 102 44.2% 36.0% 41.1% 32.3% 9.5% 20.1% 5.3% 11.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 192 54.3% 49.1% 31.4% 27.3% 9.1% 15.9% 5.1% 7.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 314 47.2% 34.6% 31.2% 25.9% 16.7% 21.7% 4.8% 17.9% Male 184 48.7% 47.2% 26.6% 28.2% 18.8% 16.9% 5.8% 7.7% Female 128 45.2% 33.1% 37.4% 28.0% 13.9% 22.7% 3.5% 16.3% Asian 31 34.8% 21.8% 34.8% 25.7% 21.7% 24.0% 8.7% 28.5% Black 30 67.9% 55.0% 14.3% 26.2% 14.3% 13.1% 3.6% 5.7% White 71 37.7% 24.9% 27.9% 24.2% 23.0% 26.1% 11.5% 24.8% Individual Education Plan Students 60 83.0% 74.9% 11.3% 18.8% 5.7% 5.2% 0.0% 1.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 46 85.0% 66.8% 12.5% 23.2% 2.5% 6.5% 0.0% 3.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 48.8% 46.0% 31.9% 28.2% 15.7% 17.3% 3.6% 8.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 315 53.1% 34.4% 28.6% 26.4% 14.7% 21.6% 3.7% 17.6% Male 166 58.2% 35.9% 26.2% 23.6% 12.8% 20.7% 2.8% 19.8% Female 149 47.7% 32.8% 31.1% 29.3% 16.7% 22.5% 4.5% 15.4% Asian 33 35.5% 22.9% 25.8% 24.0% 25.8% 25.9% 12.9% 27.2% Hispanic 177 53.8% 46.5% 31.6% 29.2% 13.3% 16.5% 1.3% 7.8% Black 29 72.7% 54.8% 13.6% 26.1% 13.6% 12.9% 0.0% 6.2% White 70 55.9% 24.7% 25.4% 25.0% 11.9% 25.9% 6.8% 24.4% Individual Education Plan Students 67 88.3% 76.4% 11.7% 17.6% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 51 67.4% 67.6% 26.1% 21.9% 6.5% 7.5% 0.0% 3.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 187 50.6% 47.9% 29.7% 28.7% 17.1% 16.4% 2.5% 7.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 290 50.7% 35.2% 28.9% 26.5% 15.4% 21.0% 5.0% 17.3% Male 161 50.0% 37.5% 27.6% 23.8% 16.7% 19.6% 5.8% 19.1% Female 129 51.6% 32.7% 30.6% 29.3% 13.7% 22.4% 4.0% 15.5% Asian 28 50.0% 24.7% 25.0% 24.8% 21.4% 24.7% 3.6% 25.9% Hispanic 172 54.8% 49.4% 29.5% 29.0% 12.0% 14.4% 3.6% 7.2% Black 25 56.5% 56.0% 30.4% 26.5% 13.0% 13.2% 0.0% 4.3% White 58 39.3% 25.4% 28.6% 25.4% 21.4% 25.3% 10.7% 23.8% Individual Education Plan Students 57 69.8% 76.1% 26.4% 16.8% 3.8% 5.3% 0.0% 1.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 44 72.5% 67.4% 20.0% 22.8% 7.5% 6.6% 0.0% 3.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 197 50.5% 48.9% 28.9% 28.8% 16.3% 15.4% 4.2% 6.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 326 63.7% 36.5% 22.8% 24.9% 10.8% 20.6% 2.8% 18.0% Male 166 63.0% 39.2% 21.2% 22.3% 12.1% 19.1% 3.6% 19.4% Female 160 64.4% 33.6% 24.4% 27.7% 9.4% 22.1% 1.9% 16.6% Asian 26 73.1% 25.9% 19.2% 23.9% 3.8% 22.6% 3.8% 27.6% Hispanic 144 62.9% 51.2% 25.2% 26.9% 9.8% 14.5% 2.1% 7.4% Black 35 62.9% 56.2% 22.9% 25.7% 11.4% 12.3% 2.9% 5.8% White 107 60.7% 27.2% 21.5% 24.0% 14.0% 24.7% 3.7% 24.1% Individual Education Plan Students 60 83.1% 78.2% 8.5% 15.9% 8.5% 4.0% 0.0% 1.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 54 83.0% 69.4% 11.3% 20.1% 5.7% 8.0% 0.0% 2.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 139 65.9% 49.4% 23.2% 26.9% 8.0% 16.5% 2.9% 7.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Reading Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 337 55.6% 31.7% 28.8% 27.3% 11.1% 21.6% 4.6% 19.5% Male 202 64.0% 34.2% 27.0% 25.8% 5.6% 20.7% 3.4% 19.3% Female 155 50.7% 29.1% 32.9% 28.8% 12.9% 22.4% 3.6% 19.7% American Indian 10 50.0% 32.1% 30.0% 34.5% 20.0% 18.4% 0.0% 15.0% Asian 38 55.3% 24.1% 21.1% 30.4% 21.1% 24.0% 2.6% 21.5% Black 32 43.3% 45.8% 46.7% 29.6% 6.7% 16.0% 3.3% 8.6% White 55 34.0% 18.0% 30.0% 25.2% 24.0% 27.2% 12.0% 29.6% Individual Education Plan Students 47 75.7% 74.1% 18.9% 18.4% 2.7% 4.6% 2.7% 2.8% Limited English Proficiency Students 102 52.7% 36.4% 39.8% 36.2% 4.3% 17.9% 3.2% 9.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 192 58.9% 47.3% 27.4% 28.5% 8.9% 15.6% 4.8% 8.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 314 51.5% 32.3% 30.4% 26.6% 13.0% 21.2% 5.2% 19.9% Male 184 53.6% 50.3% 25.5% 27.8% 14.4% 14.2% 6.5% 7.7% Female 128 48.3% 29.9% 37.1% 27.6% 11.2% 22.2% 3.4% 20.3% Asian 31 52.2% 25.9% 30.4% 29.4% 17.4% 23.8% 0.0% 21.0% Black 30 55.6% 48.1% 33.3% 28.0% 7.4% 14.8% 3.7% 9.1% White 71 24.6% 19.4% 36.1% 24.8% 23.0% 26.4% 16.4% 29.4% Individual Education Plan Students 60 82.7% 72.8% 11.5% 18.8% 5.8% 5.8% 0.0% 2.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 46 97.4% 85.7% 2.6% 10.1% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 1.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 56.2% 47.3% 29.0% 28.6% 11.1% 15.3% 3.7% 8.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 315 55.2% 32.9% 27.0% 26.4% 11.7% 21.4% 6.0% 19.3% Male 166 59.6% 35.1% 25.3% 25.1% 9.6% 20.1% 5.5% 19.6% Female 149 50.4% 30.5% 28.9% 27.7% 14.1% 22.7% 6.7% 19.1% Asian 33 43.3% 26.6% 36.7% 27.9% 13.3% 25.5% 6.7% 20.0% Hispanic 177 60.5% 51.5% 25.3% 26.6% 11.1% 14.1% 3.1% 7.7% Black 29 63.6% 49.7% 27.3% 26.5% 9.1% 15.0% 0.0% 8.8% White 70 44.4% 19.2% 27.0% 25.9% 14.3% 26.5% 14.3% 28.4% Individual Education Plan Students 67 90.2% 75.2% 8.2% 17.6% 1.6% 5.3% 0.0% 1.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 51 93.8% 84.8% 4.2% 11.3% 2.1% 2.5% 0.0% 1.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 187 53.7% 50.4% 28.7% 28.0% 12.8% 14.0% 4.9% 7.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 290 55.8% 33.4% 26.6% 25.9% 10.4% 21.1% 7.2% 19.6% Male 161 56.9% 36.7% 26.1% 24.5% 10.5% 19.9% 6.5% 18.9% Female 129 54.4% 30.0% 27.2% 27.3% 10.4% 22.4% 8.0% 20.3% Asian 28 60.0% 26.7% 28.0% 30.7% 12.0% 22.9% 0.0% 19.7% Hispanic 172 64.5% 53.7% 25.4% 26.4% 5.9% 12.4% 4.1% 7.5% Black 25 59.1% 51.2% 31.8% 26.0% 9.1% 15.3% 0.0% 7.5% White 58 28.6% 20.4% 26.8% 24.6% 23.2% 26.5% 21.4% 28.5% Individual Education Plan Students 57 81.3% 74.9% 12.5% 17.1% 0.0% 5.5% 6.3% 2.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 44 90.7% 82.6% 9.3% 13.4% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 197 58.0% 52.1% 26.6% 27.8% 9.6% 12.8% 5.9% 7.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 326 56.6% 35.2% 24.0% 24.3% 12.9% 21.2% 6.5% 19.3% Male 166 57.0% 38.5% 26.1% 23.2% 10.9% 19.7% 6.1% 18.6% Female 160 56.3% 31.6% 21.9% 25.6% 15.0% 22.7% 6.9% 20.1% Asian 26 65.4% 29.6% 23.1% 28.2% 7.7% 21.8% 3.8% 20.4% Hispanic 144 65.0% 55.3% 23.1% 24.9% 9.1% 12.9% 2.8% 7.0% Black 35 60.0% 53.0% 22.9% 24.9% 11.4% 14.5% 5.7% 7.5% White 107 43.0% 23.2% 25.2% 23.4% 19.6% 26.1% 12.2% 27.3% Individual Education Plan Students 60 78.0% 77.3% 16.9% 15.1% 5.1% 5.6% 0.0% 1.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 54 83.0% 83.4% 15.1% 13.5% 1.9% 2.5% 0.0% 0.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 139 59.4% 51.0% 23.9% 25.5% 9.4% 15.1% 7.2% 8.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Science Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 337 41.6% 33.0% 36.1% 26.9% 18.0% 22.7% 4.3% 17.4% Male 202 45.8% 35.5% 39.1% 26.6% 12.8% 20.7% 2.2% 17.2% Female 155 36.9% 30.3% 35.5% 27.2% 23.4% 24.8% 4.3% 17.7% American Indian 10 22.2% 32.4% 33.3% 30.6% 44.4% 24.0% 0.0% 13.0% Asian 38 44.7% 24.9% 23.7% 26.0% 21.1% 27.8% 10.5% 21.3% Black 32 37.9% 51.0% 44.8% 28.4% 10.3% 14.4% 6.9% 6.3% White 55 30.0% 22.8% 30.0% 24.1% 34.0% 26.8% 6.0% 26.3% Individual Education Plan Students 47 55.6% 65.1% 33.3% 26.5% 11.1% 6.4% 0.0% 2.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 102 35.5% 33.6% 40.9% 32.0% 22.6% 25.1% 1.1% 9.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 192 47.6% 43.9% 31.0% 30.1% 17.9% 18.0% 3.6% 7.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 314 44.4% 33.6% 30.5% 26.4% 18.6% 21.8% 6.5% 18.2% Male 184 46.9% 45.8% 27.2% 30.0% 19.1% 17.1% 6.8% 7.1% Female 128 41.0% 31.3% 35.0% 26.5% 17.9% 24.0% 6.0% 18.3% Asian 31 42.3% 25.4% 42.3% 26.8% 11.5% 25.8% 3.8% 22.0% Black 30 48.1% 52.7% 37.0% 27.1% 11.1% 12.8% 3.7% 7.4% White 71 35.5% 23.7% 24.2% 23.9% 22.6% 25.8% 17.7% 26.6% Individual Education Plan Students 60 75.5% 64.5% 18.9% 26.6% 3.8% 6.8% 1.9% 2.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 46 76.7% 66.7% 23.3% 26.3% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 1.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 188 42.4% 44.6% 35.9% 29.7% 17.6% 17.2% 4.1% 8.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 315 46.7% 32.7% 32.8% 26.2% 14.6% 22.7% 5.8% 18.3% Male 166 51.8% 35.3% 29.8% 25.8% 12.1% 20.4% 6.4% 18.6% Female 149 41.4% 30.1% 36.1% 26.7% 17.3% 25.2% 5.3% 18.1% Asian 33 40.0% 24.8% 33.3% 25.4% 16.7% 28.0% 10.0% 21.8% Hispanic 177 51.6% 44.8% 32.3% 29.6% 13.7% 17.7% 2.5% 8.0% Black 29 59.1% 50.1% 27.3% 27.6% 13.6% 15.6% 0.0% 6.6% White 70 34.5% 23.4% 36.2% 24.1% 15.5% 26.3% 13.8% 26.2% Individual Education Plan Students 67 65.5% 64.4% 32.8% 27.1% 1.7% 6.5% 0.0% 2.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 51 76.6% 67.8% 21.3% 24.5% 2.1% 5.7% 0.0% 1.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 187 43.8% 45.2% 37.5% 29.6% 14.4% 17.6% 4.4% 7.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 290 48.5% 33.3% 30.1% 26.1% 16.5% 22.4% 4.9% 18.2% Male 161 53.4% 36.9% 26.7% 25.2% 15.8% 20.0% 4.1% 17.9% Female 129 42.5% 29.5% 34.2% 27.1% 17.5% 24.8% 5.8% 18.6% Asian 28 44.4% 24.4% 33.3% 28.3% 18.5% 26.2% 3.7% 21.1% Hispanic 172 48.1% 47.7% 36.1% 29.1% 12.7% 16.2% 3.2% 6.9% Black 25 66.7% 50.8% 23.8% 28.4% 9.5% 14.7% 0.0% 6.1% White 58 45.3% 23.8% 15.1% 23.7% 28.3% 26.3% 11.3% 26.1% Individual Education Plan Students 57 78.0% 68.1% 18.0% 24.2% 4.0% 6.1% 0.0% 1.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 44 70.3% 65.4% 29.7% 26.8% 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 1.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 197 49.2% 45.3% 29.1% 30.3% 16.8% 17.2% 5.0% 7.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 326 48.0% 35.1% 29.5% 25.3% 15.7% 22.9% 6.8% 16.7% Male 166 53.9% 38.8% 28.5% 24.9% 13.3% 20.3% 4.2% 16.0% Female 160 41.9% 31.3% 30.6% 25.7% 18.1% 25.5% 9.4% 17.5% Asian 26 53.8% 28.1% 26.9% 24.7% 15.4% 26.6% 3.8% 20.6% Hispanic 144 49.0% 48.5% 35.7% 28.5% 12.6% 17.0% 2.8% 6.1% Black 35 65.7% 53.2% 11.4% 27.5% 17.1% 13.8% 5.7% 5.6% White 107 36.4% 26.4% 29.0% 23.5% 20.6% 26.7% 14.0% 23.4% Individual Education Plan Students 60 72.9% 67.8% 25.4% 25.2% 1.7% 5.7% 0.0% 1.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 54 62.3% 66.8% 34.0% 25.9% 3.8% 6.3% 0.0% 1.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 139 50.7% 43.5% 30.4% 30.1% 11.6% 17.6% 7.2% 8.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grade 11 Students Tested: 329
Procter R Hug High School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.0%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
1.8%State:
1.1%
Meets Standard This School:
50.5%State:
54.4%
Exceeds Standard This School:
6.4%State:
18.2%
Procter R Hug High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : Nevada :
Male
This School : Nevada :
Female
This School : State :
Asian
This School : State :
Black
Here : State :
White
Here : Nevada :
Two or more Races
This School : State :
Individual Education Plan Students
This School : State :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 329 -14.5% 1.3% 1.8% 1.1% 41.3% 26.3% 50.5% 54.4% 6.4% 18.2% Male 164 -13.4% 1.0% 1.8% 1.2% 40.2% 26.6% 52.4% 52.9% 5.5% 19.4% Female 165 -15.5% 1.7% 1.8% 1.0% 42.4% 26.1% 48.5% 56.0% 7.3% 17.0% Asian 10 -21.3% 15.8% 0.0% 0.3% 50.0% 12.6% 40.0% 51.2% 10.0% 35.9% Hispanic 217 -14.2% -8.9% 1.8% 1.5% 41.0% 36.1% 52.5% 52.8% 4.6% 9.6% Black 24 -25.5% -18.4% 0.0% 2.5% 54.2% 44.5% 41.7% 46.1% 4.2% 6.9% White 48 -15.0% 11.6% 4.2% 0.5% 39.6% 16.6% 43.8% 57.7% 12.5% 25.2% Two or more Races 27 -0.9% 11.6% 0.0% 0.3% 29.6% 16.8% 59.3% 60.0% 11.1% 22.9% Individual Education Plan Students 52 -65.5% -42.3% 7.7% 5.9% 86.5% 65.0% 5.8% 26.5% 0.0% 2.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 58 -47.2% -40.6% 5.2% 4.1% 70.7% 65.2% 22.4% 27.9% 1.7% 2.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 329 -14.5% -9.7% 1.8% 1.5% 41.3% 36.9% 50.5% 51.5% 6.4% 10.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 309 -13.0% 0.6% 4.9% 2.7% 36.8% 25.4% 49.5% 54.5% 8.8% 17.4% Male 153 -11.8% 1.5% 5.9% 3.3% 34.6% 23.9% 49.7% 53.8% 9.8% 19.1% Female 156 -14.2% -0.4% 3.9% 2.2% 39.0% 26.9% 49.4% 55.2% 7.8% 15.7% Asian 32 -11.9% 11.4% 6.3% 1.0% 34.4% 16.3% 50.0% 54.3% 9.4% 28.4% Hispanic 188 -17.0% -9.7% 4.3% 3.3% 41.5% 35.1% 47.9% 52.8% 6.4% 8.8% Black 21 -14.2% -21.1% 4.8% 7.3% 38.1% 42.4% 42.9% 43.8% 14.3% 6.5% White 65 -3.0% 11.0% 6.3% 1.5% 25.4% 16.1% 54.0% 58.4% 14.3% 23.9% Individual Education Plan Students 49 -57.0% -41.7% 18.4% 19.5% 67.3% 50.9% 14.3% 28.0% 0.0% 1.7% Limited English Proficiency Students 47 -50.0% -43.8% 10.6% 10.2% 68.1% 62.4% 21.3% 25.1% 0.0% 2.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 246 -14.7% -11.1% 5.3% 4.4% 38.1% 35.5% 48.8% 50.8% 7.8% 9.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 259 -7.1% 8.6% 6.3% 3.8% 38.9% 25.7% 46.0% 51.4% 8.7% 19.0% Male 132 -4.6% 10.4% 5.3% 4.1% 37.4% 23.6% 47.3% 51.1% 9.9% 21.1% Female 127 -9.8% 6.8% 7.4% 3.5% 40.5% 27.8% 44.6% 51.7% 7.4% 17.0% Asian 44 -11.9% 19.2% 6.8% 1.3% 43.2% 17.6% 38.6% 53.0% 11.4% 28.0% Hispanic 139 -4.8% -2.4% 7.4% 5.2% 35.6% 35.3% 49.6% 49.4% 7.4% 10.0% Black 27 -21.1% -11.2% 7.4% 8.5% 51.9% 40.8% 29.6% 43.0% 11.1% 7.7% White 43 -1.9% 17.7% 2.5% 2.3% 37.5% 18.1% 52.5% 54.2% 7.5% 25.4% Individual Education Plan Students 39 -53.0% -37.9% 23.5% 28.8% 67.6% 47.2% 8.8% 22.0% 0.0% 2.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -49.7% -30.8% 27.3% 16.9% 60.6% 52.0% 12.1% 27.2% 0.0% 3.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 193 -6.6% -4.4% 6.4% 6.6% 38.3% 35.9% 46.3% 48.0% 9.0% 9.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 231 -7.0% 9.7% 8.3% 4.3% 36.8% 24.1% 47.4% 52.9% 7.5% 18.6% Male 118 -3.2% 11.9% 10.3% 4.4% 31.0% 21.8% 50.9% 53.0% 7.8% 20.8% Female 113 -11.0% 7.4% 6.3% 4.3% 42.9% 26.4% 43.8% 52.9% 7.1% 16.4% Asian 23 7.7% 19.1% 13.0% 2.8% 17.4% 16.2% 60.9% 53.0% 8.7% 28.0% Hispanic 125 -9.5% -2.9% 6.5% 6.1% 41.1% 34.9% 48.4% 49.8% 4.0% 9.2% Black 28 -38.8% -13.0% 19.2% 10.1% 57.7% 41.1% 15.4% 42.0% 7.7% 6.8% White 52 7.4% 19.5% 5.8% 2.5% 25.0% 16.1% 55.8% 56.9% 13.5% 24.5% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -44.4% -37.7% 37.5% 30.1% 45.0% 45.7% 17.5% 22.6% 0.0% 1.6% Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -48.1% -30.8% 27.6% 17.2% 58.6% 51.7% 6.9% 27.0% 6.9% 4.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 141 -4.0% -5.3% 10.0% 8.1% 32.1% 35.3% 51.4% 47.5% 6.4% 9.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 228 -5.4% 11.8% 8.9% 4.0% 44.2% 32.0% 43.3% 47.4% 3.6% 16.7% Male 112 -3.2% 15.6% 10.9% 4.4% 40.0% 27.7% 44.5% 48.2% 4.5% 19.7% Female 116 -7.6% 8.0% 7.0% 3.6% 48.2% 36.1% 42.1% 46.5% 2.6% 13.8% Asian 25 7.7% 22.6% 8.0% 2.2% 32.0% 23.0% 44.0% 49.7% 16.0% 25.2% Hispanic 129 -9.1% -3.5% 7.2% 6.0% 49.6% 45.2% 42.4% 41.1% 0.8% 7.8% Black 14 -9.4% -12.3% 28.6% 9.6% 28.6% 50.4% 35.7% 34.1% 7.1% 5.9% White 58 -4.0% 22.1% 8.6% 2.2% 43.1% 23.4% 44.8% 52.5% 3.4% 21.9% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -44.4% -35.7% 36.8% 27.9% 55.3% 55.4% 7.9% 15.5% 0.0% 1.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -31.1% -29.7% 15.2% 16.4% 63.6% 61.0% 18.2% 20.4% 3.0% 2.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 123 -6.0% -5.9% 11.4% 7.6% 42.3% 46.0% 43.1% 39.4% 3.3% 7.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 196 -2.6% 19.8% 13.8% 4.4% 36.5% 23.5% 48.1% 58.0% 1.6% 14.1% Male 116 0.4% 22.7% 14.5% 5.0% 32.7% 20.1% 50.9% 58.3% 1.8% 16.6% Female 80 -6.7% 17.0% 12.7% 3.8% 41.8% 26.9% 44.3% 57.7% 1.3% 11.6% Asian 22 -14.2% 27.3% 4.8% 2.4% 57.1% 18.0% 38.1% 58.9% 0.0% 20.7% Hispanic 108 -7.4% 5.3% 15.0% 6.5% 40.2% 35.9% 43.0% 50.9% 1.9% 6.7% Black 21 -15.5% -3.6% 26.3% 12.0% 36.8% 39.4% 36.8% 44.2% 0.0% 4.4% White 42 19.5% 29.1% 10.3% 2.4% 17.9% 16.2% 71.8% 63.3% 0.0% 18.1% Individual Education Plan Students 32 -42.3% -28.6% 63.3% 30.9% 26.7% 45.4% 10.0% 22.7% 0.0% 1.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 -29.4% -19.0% 25.7% 17.7% 51.4% 49.0% 22.9% 31.1% 0.0% 2.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 132 0.0% 3.1% 10.9% 8.7% 36.7% 35.8% 50.8% 49.3% 1.6% 6.1% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 179 -9.3% 11.2% 29.7% 10.1% 27.2% 26.4% 40.5% 50.0% 2.5% 13.5% Male 97 -10.8% 12.0% 28.0% 11.1% 30.5% 24.6% 40.2% 49.2% 1.2% 15.1% Female 82 -7.6% 10.4% 31.6% 9.1% 23.7% 28.2% 40.8% 50.9% 3.9% 11.8% Asian 23 -14.2% 20.3% 23.8% 5.0% 38.1% 22.4% 33.3% 52.6% 4.8% 20.0% Hispanic 81 -14.8% -7.5% 38.9% 16.3% 23.6% 38.9% 36.1% 40.1% 1.4% 4.7% Black 19 -21.1% -12.4% 31.3% 20.7% 37.5% 39.4% 31.3% 36.2% 0.0% 3.7% White 53 4.2% 23.5% 19.6% 5.7% 23.9% 18.5% 52.2% 57.1% 4.3% 18.7% Individual Education Plan Students 36 -48.6% -37.0% 70.4% 47.7% 25.9% 37.0% 3.7% 14.2% 0.0% 1.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 33 -32.3% -16.8% 60.0% 20.3% 20.0% 44.2% 20.0% 33.4% 0.0% 2.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 93 -11.3% -9.7% 28.9% 16.4% 30.1% 41.0% 37.3% 39.0% 3.6% 3.6% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 320 -2.8% 14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 42.3% 40.0% 57.7% 0.0% 0.0% Male 157 2.4% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 54.8% 40.5% 45.2% 59.5% 0.0% 0.0% Female 162 -7.6% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0% 64.8% 44.3% 35.2% 55.7% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian 10 27.2% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 54.3% 70.0% 45.7% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 33 -9.5% 24.6% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 32.6% 33.3% 67.4% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic 154 -7.7% -3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 64.9% 61.1% 35.1% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% Black 29 -22.1% -7.3% 0.0% 0.0% 79.3% 64.5% 20.7% 35.5% 0.0% 0.0% White 93 9.9% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 47.3% 30.9% 52.7% 69.1% 0.0% 0.0% Individual Education Plan Students 52 -35.1% -28.5% 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 85.7% 7.7% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -25.7% -19.3% 0.0% 0.0% 82.9% 76.5% 17.1% 23.5% 0.0% 0.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 147 -6.7% -1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 63.9% 59.0% 36.1% 41.0% 0.0% 0.0% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grade 11 Students Tested: 328
This School:
99.7%State:
99.4%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
1.2%Nevada:
0.6%
Approaches Standard This School:
8.6%Nevada:
5.0%
Exceeds Standard This School:
29.1%State:
47.2%
Procter R Hug High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
3.5%State:
7.7%
Hispanic This School:
3.6%Nevada:
5.0%
Black This School:
9.1%State:
2.5%
Two or more Races This School:
13.3%State:
11.1%
Individual Education Plan Students
Here : Nevada :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students This School:
3.5%Nevada:
4.5%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 328 3.5% 7.7% 1.2% 0.6% 8.6% 5.0% 61.2% 47.2% 29.1% 47.2% Male 163 0.4% 6.1% 2.5% 0.8% 10.4% 6.4% 60.1% 48.6% 27.0% 44.2% Female 165 6.6% 9.4% 0.0% 0.5% 6.7% 3.4% 62.2% 45.7% 31.1% 50.4% Asian 10 -6.7% 9.3% 0.0% 0.6% 20.0% 3.5% 70.0% 39.6% 10.0% 56.4% Hispanic 217 3.6% 5.0% 1.4% 0.8% 8.3% 7.5% 65.4% 58.3% 24.9% 33.4% Black 24 9.1% 2.5% 0.0% 1.2% 4.2% 9.6% 66.7% 59.5% 29.2% 29.6% White 47 -1.9% 10.7% 2.2% 0.4% 13.0% 2.2% 39.1% 36.2% 45.7% 61.2% Two or more Races 27 13.3% 11.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 1.9% 59.3% 41.1% 40.7% 56.7% Individual Education Plan Students 51 -14.7% -16.2% 2.0% 3.7% 26.0% 25.8% 64.0% 60.0% 8.0% 10.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 58 -22.9% -15.4% 5.2% 2.9% 31.0% 25.8% 60.3% 65.2% 3.5% 6.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 328 3.5% 4.5% 1.2% 0.9% 8.6% 7.9% 61.2% 57.3% 29.1% 33.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 309 0.9% 7.3% 1.0% 0.6% 11.4% 5.4% 55.6% 44.5% 32.0% 49.5% Male 153 0.1% 6.0% 1.3% 0.9% 11.9% 6.4% 54.3% 45.1% 32.5% 47.6% Female 156 1.7% 8.6% 0.6% 0.3% 11.0% 4.3% 56.8% 44.0% 31.6% 51.3% Asian 32 3.9% 9.5% 0.0% 0.2% 9.4% 3.6% 46.9% 40.6% 43.8% 55.6% Hispanic 188 -1.7% 4.6% 1.1% 0.9% 13.9% 7.8% 61.0% 57.0% 24.1% 34.3% Black 21 13.3% 1.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 10.9% 61.9% 55.1% 38.1% 32.6% White 65 2.2% 10.3% 1.6% 0.4% 9.5% 2.6% 39.7% 33.9% 49.2% 63.1% Individual Education Plan Students 49 -25.0% -22.0% 4.3% 3.9% 34.0% 31.4% 59.6% 54.2% 2.1% 10.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 47 -30.2% -21.5% 2.2% 3.2% 41.3% 31.5% 54.3% 61.3% 2.2% 3.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 246 -0.6% 3.2% 1.2% 1.0% 12.7% 9.1% 57.8% 55.3% 28.3% 34.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 259 4.4% 11.3% 2.8% 1.2% 10.5% 5.1% 56.9% 41.4% 29.8% 52.2% Male 132 2.5% 9.8% 3.2% 1.7% 12.0% 6.2% 57.6% 42.4% 27.2% 49.7% Female 127 6.3% 12.8% 2.4% 0.8% 8.9% 4.2% 56.1% 40.4% 32.5% 54.7% Asian 44 1.4% 13.8% 7.0% 0.7% 9.3% 3.2% 51.2% 37.4% 32.6% 58.7% Hispanic 139 4.7% 7.8% 2.3% 1.7% 10.7% 8.1% 57.3% 53.8% 29.8% 36.4% Black 27 6.6% 7.2% 0.0% 2.2% 11.1% 8.3% 74.1% 53.5% 14.8% 36.0% White 43 3.0% 13.9% 2.4% 0.7% 12.2% 3.0% 46.3% 32.0% 39.0% 64.2% Individual Education Plan Students 39 -30.9% -22.8% 11.4% 9.8% 37.1% 30.7% 45.7% 47.5% 5.7% 12.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -32.3% -18.7% 14.7% 7.0% 35.3% 29.4% 44.1% 56.8% 5.9% 6.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 193 4.1% 6.5% 3.3% 2.2% 10.3% 9.0% 57.1% 53.0% 29.3% 35.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 231 5.4% 11.0% 3.1% 1.6% 9.2% 5.1% 61.8% 46.2% 25.9% 47.1% Male 118 3.9% 10.0% 3.4% 1.8% 10.3% 5.8% 58.6% 47.4% 27.6% 44.9% Female 113 7.0% 12.1% 2.7% 1.3% 8.0% 4.3% 65.2% 45.1% 24.1% 49.3% Asian 23 4.6% 12.6% 4.3% 1.3% 8.7% 3.8% 73.9% 46.4% 13.0% 48.5% Hispanic 125 4.7% 6.4% 1.6% 2.5% 11.4% 8.8% 65.0% 58.4% 22.0% 30.3% Black 28 -0.8% 5.4% 7.4% 3.4% 11.1% 8.8% 59.3% 56.8% 22.2% 31.0% White 52 10.0% 14.4% 3.8% 0.8% 3.8% 2.5% 48.1% 37.4% 44.2% 59.4% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -24.8% -20.2% 15.0% 12.1% 27.5% 25.7% 50.0% 53.2% 7.5% 8.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -39.5% -21.9% 10.7% 9.9% 46.4% 29.7% 39.3% 55.6% 3.6% 4.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 141 3.4% 4.3% 4.3% 3.4% 10.0% 10.0% 57.9% 57.3% 27.9% 29.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 228 -0.2% 13.0% 4.9% 1.7% 17.4% 7.4% 57.6% 42.4% 20.1% 48.5% Male 112 -4.3% 11.9% 4.5% 2.2% 21.8% 8.0% 60.0% 43.6% 13.6% 46.2% Female 116 3.7% 14.0% 5.3% 1.3% 13.2% 6.8% 55.3% 41.3% 26.3% 50.7% Asian 25 6.1% 15.4% 0.0% 0.8% 16.0% 5.9% 60.0% 42.4% 24.0% 50.9% Hispanic 129 -4.3% 6.4% 6.4% 2.7% 20.0% 13.0% 60.8% 53.1% 12.8% 31.2% Black 14 -6.5% 5.4% 7.1% 4.4% 21.4% 12.3% 42.9% 53.4% 28.6% 29.9% White 58 6.6% 17.2% 3.4% 1.0% 12.1% 3.9% 53.4% 35.0% 31.0% 60.1% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -47.1% -27.4% 17.9% 14.3% 51.3% 35.2% 30.8% 42.4% 0.0% 8.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -30.8% -27.8% 11.8% 9.3% 41.2% 40.5% 47.1% 44.2% 0.0% 6.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 123 -1.5% 4.1% 6.5% 3.6% 17.1% 14.4% 56.9% 52.8% 19.5% 29.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 196 -5.9% 11.9% 4.2% 1.8% 23.8% 8.5% 54.0% 46.3% 18.0% 43.5% Male 116 -10.6% 10.2% 7.1% 2.4% 25.7% 9.4% 53.1% 46.2% 14.2% 41.9% Female 80 1.0% 13.5% 0.0% 1.1% 21.1% 7.5% 55.3% 46.3% 23.7% 45.1% Asian 22 -11.2% 13.5% 4.8% 1.3% 28.6% 7.3% 52.4% 46.2% 14.3% 45.2% Hispanic 108 -11.9% 4.2% 2.9% 2.6% 31.1% 15.3% 53.4% 56.6% 12.6% 25.5% Black 21 -11.2% 2.9% 14.3% 4.4% 19.0% 14.8% 52.4% 55.0% 14.3% 25.8% White 42 14.8% 16.6% 2.4% 1.0% 4.9% 4.6% 58.5% 40.0% 34.1% 54.4% Individual Education Plan Students 32 -47.9% -29.2% 20.0% 13.6% 50.0% 37.7% 26.7% 41.2% 3.3% 7.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 35 -47.6% -25.9% 6.1% 8.9% 63.6% 39.1% 30.3% 43.7% 0.0% 8.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 132 -6.4% 2.4% 3.1% 3.8% 25.4% 16.0% 55.4% 56.7% 16.2% 23.6% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 179 -15.8% 4.9% 14.4% 5.1% 23.5% 12.1% 38.6% 42.3% 23.5% 40.5% Male 97 -15.4% 2.2% 13.8% 6.5% 23.8% 13.3% 45.0% 41.8% 17.5% 38.3% Female 82 -16.3% 7.6% 15.1% 3.6% 23.3% 10.9% 31.5% 42.8% 30.1% 42.7% Asian 23 -25.3% 9.0% 15.8% 2.9% 31.6% 10.1% 42.1% 47.1% 10.5% 39.9% Hispanic 81 -23.1% -8.2% 21.9% 9.4% 23.3% 20.9% 39.7% 48.8% 15.1% 20.9% Black 19 -15.4% -7.1% 12.5% 9.7% 25.0% 19.6% 43.8% 49.0% 18.8% 21.7% White 53 -1.7% 12.8% 2.4% 2.5% 21.4% 6.8% 31.0% 37.4% 45.2% 53.3% Individual Education Plan Students 36 -49.9% -41.5% 28.0% 28.4% 44.0% 35.3% 28.0% 30.2% 0.0% 6.2% Limited English Proficiency Students 33 -39.2% -20.1% 41.9% 14.4% 19.4% 27.8% 25.8% 50.5% 12.9% 7.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 93 -15.7% -6.1% 17.1% 7.4% 20.7% 20.8% 42.7% 51.8% 19.5% 20.0% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 320 -12.6% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 39.1% 22.8% 60.9% 77.2% 0.0% 0.0% Male 157 -17.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 43.9% 26.0% 56.1% 74.0% 0.0% 0.0% Female 162 -8.1% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 34.6% 19.6% 65.4% 80.4% 0.0% 0.0% American Indian 10 -3.5% -3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 29.9% 70.0% 70.1% 0.0% 0.0% Asian 33 -22.0% 6.5% 0.0% 0.0% 48.5% 20.0% 51.5% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% Hispanic 154 -17.0% -11.5% 0.0% 0.0% 43.5% 38.0% 56.5% 62.0% 0.0% 0.0% Black 29 -11.4% -7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 37.9% 34.1% 62.1% 65.9% 0.0% 0.0% White 93 -2.5% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% 29.0% 13.9% 71.0% 86.1% 0.0% 0.0% Individual Education Plan Students 52 -38.9% -38.5% 0.0% 0.0% 65.4% 65.0% 34.6% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 41 -58.9% -36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 85.4% 62.9% 14.6% 37.1% 0.0% 0.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 147 -15.0% -10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.5% 36.5% 58.5% 63.6% 0.0% 0.0% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Science Grade 11 Students Tested: 329
Procter R Hug High School:
97.3%Nevada:
98.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
49.1%State:
64.3%
Procter R Hug High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : Nevada :
Male
Here : State :
Female
Here : Nevada :
Asian
This School : State :
Hispanic
Here : State :
Black
This School : State :
White
This School : State :
Two or more Races
This School : State :
Individual Education Plan Students
Here : State :
Limited English Proficiency Students
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 329 -36.1% -15.7% 15.3% 8.7% 34.1% 20.3% 49.1% 64.3% 1.6% 6.8% Male 164 -33.9% -13.6% 14.5% 9.2% 32.7% 17.7% 50.9% 64.1% 1.9% 9.1% Female 165 -38.3% -17.8% 16.2% 8.1% 35.4% 23.0% 47.2% 64.5% 1.2% 4.4% Asian 10 -56.7% -7.4% 20.0% 5.4% 50.0% 15.3% 20.0% 69.6% 10.0% 9.7% Hispanic 217 -36.5% -28.3% 15.8% 13.0% 34.0% 28.6% 49.3% 55.6% 1.0% 2.9% Black 24 -40.9% -35.7% 12.5% 17.8% 41.7% 31.2% 45.8% 49.3% 0.0% 1.7% White 47 -28.0% -2.5% 10.9% 3.8% 30.4% 12.0% 54.4% 73.4% 4.4% 10.9% Two or more Races 28 -33.1% -5.1% 17.9% 4.6% 28.6% 13.8% 53.6% 73.7% 0.0% 8.0% Individual Education Plan Students 52 -76.5% -55.4% 44.9% 37.6% 44.9% 31.2% 10.2% 30.2% 0.0% 1.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 58 -75.8% -65.8% 56.4% 38.2% 32.7% 40.9% 10.9% 20.6% 0.0% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 329 -36.1% -27.7% 15.3% 13.4% 34.1% 27.6% 49.1% 55.9% 1.6% 3.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 309 -25.4% -8.3% 11.1% 6.8% 27.5% 14.8% 55.7% 61.6% 5.6% 16.8% Male 153 -25.1% -6.0% 11.9% 7.1% 26.5% 12.1% 52.3% 59.0% 9.3% 21.7% Female 156 -25.7% -10.7% 10.4% 6.4% 28.6% 17.6% 59.1% 64.2% 1.9% 11.9% Asian 32 -27.3% -2.0% 12.5% 4.4% 28.1% 10.8% 53.1% 62.7% 6.3% 22.1% Hispanic 188 -29.5% -18.6% 12.8% 9.9% 29.9% 22.1% 54.0% 59.8% 3.2% 8.3% Black 21 -24.8% -27.3% 0.0% 15.4% 38.1% 25.3% 57.1% 54.3% 4.8% 5.1% White 65 -14.1% 2.5% 9.7% 2.9% 17.7% 7.9% 59.7% 64.3% 12.9% 24.9% Individual Education Plan Students 49 -61.2% -50.2% 40.4% 34.5% 34.0% 28.9% 25.5% 34.6% 0.0% 1.9% Limited English Proficiency Students 47 -69.3% -61.7% 41.3% 35.7% 41.3% 39.3% 17.4% 24.6% 0.0% 0.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 246 -29.1% -19.7% 12.8% 11.5% 29.6% 21.5% 53.1% 58.3% 4.5% 8.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 259 -25.6% -6.6% 15.3% 7.5% 27.9% 16.8% 52.0% 59.8% 4.8% 15.9% Male 132 -18.9% -3.5% 10.7% 7.5% 25.9% 13.6% 58.0% 58.0% 5.4% 20.9% Female 127 -31.9% -9.7% 19.7% 7.6% 29.9% 19.8% 46.2% 61.6% 4.3% 11.0% Asian 44 -32.3% -1.3% 15.0% 4.7% 35.0% 14.2% 47.5% 62.2% 2.5% 18.9% Hispanic 139 -29.0% -19.0% 16.7% 11.8% 30.0% 24.8% 48.3% 56.3% 5.0% 7.0% Black 27 -14.3% -25.3% 8.0% 15.4% 24.0% 27.6% 60.0% 50.8% 8.0% 6.1% White 43 -19.2% 3.6% 18.4% 3.8% 18.4% 10.2% 57.9% 63.2% 5.3% 22.8% Individual Education Plan Students 39 -59.7% -51.6% 48.4% 41.8% 29.0% 27.5% 22.6% 28.6% 0.0% 2.0% Limited English Proficiency Students 33 -71.2% -60.4% 51.9% 42.3% 37.0% 35.8% 11.1% 20.9% 0.0% 1.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 194 -28.3% -20.9% 16.9% 13.3% 29.1% 25.2% 50.6% 54.2% 3.5% 7.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
High School Proficiency Examination Writing Grade 11
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
0.9%Nevada:
1.2%
Approaches Standard This School:
30.6%Nevada:
20.1%
Meets Standard This School:
68.5%State:
76.4%
Procter R Hug High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
This School : State :
Female
This School : Nevada :
Asian
This School : State :
Hispanic
This School : Nevada :
Black
This School : Nevada :
White
This School : State :
Individual Education Plan Students
This School : State :
Limited English Proficiency Students
This School : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Procter R Hug High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 334 -18.2% -8.0% 0.9% 1.2% 30.6% 20.1% 68.5% 76.4% 0.0% 2.3% Male 167 -20.9% -13.7% 0.6% 1.9% 33.5% 25.2% 65.8% 71.2% 0.0% 1.8% Female 167 -15.5% -2.1% 1.2% 0.6% 27.6% 14.9% 71.2% 81.8% 0.0% 2.8% Asian 10 -36.7% -1.8% 0.0% 0.7% 50.0% 14.3% 50.0% 80.2% 0.0% 4.7% Hispanic 217 -19.7% -18.1% 0.5% 2.1% 32.6% 29.4% 67.0% 67.7% 0.0% 0.9% Black 25 -3.4% -18.6% 0.0% 1.6% 16.7% 30.3% 83.3% 67.3% 0.0% 0.8% White 51 -22.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.6% 36.2% 11.8% 63.8% 84.1% 0.0% 3.4% Two or more Races 28 -4.6% 2.5% 3.6% 0.2% 14.3% 10.6% 82.1% 86.0% 0.0% 3.2% Individual Education Plan Students 57 -60.7% -53.7% 0.0% 7.8% 74.0% 59.1% 26.0% 32.8% 0.0% 0.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 58 -66.7% -61.3% 5.5% 8.0% 74.6% 66.6% 20.0% 25.3% 0.0% 0.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 334 -18.2% -17.5% 0.9% 2.0% 30.6% 28.9% 68.5% 68.3% 0.0% 0.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 309 -13.6% -1.5% 2.3% 1.8% 24.6% 13.0% 72.2% 82.3% 1.0% 2.9% Male 153 -19.4% -5.9% 2.6% 2.4% 30.1% 16.8% 66.7% 78.7% 0.7% 2.1% Female 156 -7.9% 2.9% 1.9% 1.3% 19.2% 9.1% 77.6% 85.9% 1.3% 3.7% Asian 32 -11.7% 2.5% 3.1% 1.3% 21.9% 9.5% 71.9% 84.1% 3.1% 5.1% Hispanic 188 -14.9% -8.6% 1.6% 2.3% 26.6% 19.6% 70.7% 77.0% 1.1% 1.2% Black 21 -1.0% -9.9% 0.0% 3.4% 14.3% 19.7% 85.7% 75.7% 0.0% 1.1% White 65 -14.4% 4.7% 4.6% 1.3% 23.1% 7.4% 72.3% 87.3% 0.0% 4.1% Individual Education Plan Students 49 -54.0% -44.4% 6.1% 8.4% 61.2% 49.3% 32.7% 42.2% 0.0% 0.1% Limited English Proficiency Students 47 -63.3% -58.0% 8.5% 9.6% 68.1% 61.7% 23.4% 28.7% 0.0% 0.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 246 -16.0% -9.6% 2.8% 2.8% 26.4% 20.2% 70.3% 76.0% 0.4% 1.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 259 -4.2% 5.1% 3.2% 0.9% 18.7% 11.7% 76.9% 83.1% 1.2% 4.4% Male 132 -11.3% 1.2% 3.1% 1.3% 26.0% 15.1% 70.2% 80.3% 0.8% 3.3% Female 127 3.5% 9.0% 3.3% 0.4% 10.8% 8.2% 84.2% 85.8% 1.7% 5.5% Asian 44 -11.9% 8.5% 6.8% 0.6% 22.7% 8.6% 70.5% 81.5% 0.0% 9.3% Hispanic 139 -2.9% -2.4% 3.7% 1.5% 16.9% 18.6% 78.7% 78.3% 0.7% 1.6% Black 27 -4.6% -0.5% 0.0% 1.3% 22.2% 16.8% 77.8% 79.8% 0.0% 2.0% White 43 -0.8% 10.2% 0.0% 0.4% 18.4% 7.0% 78.9% 86.9% 2.6% 5.6% Individual Education Plan Students 39 -41.2% -37.4% 11.8% 7.3% 47.1% 47.7% 41.2% 44.6% 0.0% 0.3% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -64.7% -50.1% 20.6% 6.8% 61.8% 60.9% 17.6% 32.2% 0.0% 0.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 193 -4.4% -3.2% 3.2% 1.6% 18.8% 19.3% 76.9% 77.2% 1.1% 1.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 231 -7.0% 5.3% 5.2% 3.0% 19.5% 9.5% 72.3% 81.4% 3.0% 6.2% Male 118 -17.1% 2.1% 5.9% 3.6% 28.8% 11.9% 63.6% 79.9% 1.7% 4.5% Female 113 3.5% 8.4% 4.4% 2.3% 9.7% 7.0% 81.4% 82.9% 4.4% 7.9% Asian 23 -4.1% 8.1% 8.7% 2.3% 13.0% 7.3% 69.6% 81.5% 8.7% 9.0% Hispanic 125 -7.1% -2.1% 4.0% 4.3% 20.8% 15.5% 74.4% 77.7% 0.8% 2.5% Black 28 -18.0% -2.1% 10.7% 4.0% 25.0% 15.8% 60.7% 77.1% 3.6% 3.1% White 52 -3.5% 10.4% 3.8% 2.1% 17.3% 5.2% 73.1% 84.3% 5.8% 8.4% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -49.8% -33.4% 15.0% 11.9% 52.5% 39.2% 32.5% 48.5% 0.0% 0.5% Limited English Proficiency Students 29 -68.5% -43.8% 10.3% 11.9% 75.9% 49.6% 10.3% 38.3% 3.4% 0.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 141 -4.3% -3.9% 6.4% 4.9% 15.6% 16.7% 75.9% 75.9% 2.1% 2.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 228 -2.7% 13.1% 4.1% 0.9% 20.7% 8.0% 72.5% 80.7% 2.7% 10.4% Male 112 -9.4% 10.8% 5.6% 1.2% 25.9% 10.1% 68.5% 80.8% 0.0% 7.9% Female 116 3.7% 15.4% 2.6% 0.7% 15.8% 6.0% 76.3% 80.5% 5.3% 12.7% Asian 25 -5.9% 15.8% 0.0% 0.6% 28.0% 5.7% 68.0% 76.6% 4.0% 17.2% Hispanic 129 -6.1% 5.6% 4.8% 1.6% 23.4% 14.8% 69.4% 78.8% 2.4% 4.7% Black 14 -13.6% 6.8% 14.3% 1.8% 21.4% 13.5% 64.3% 78.6% 0.0% 6.0% White 58 8.1% 17.5% 1.8% 0.5% 12.3% 4.1% 82.5% 82.6% 3.5% 12.8% Individual Education Plan Students 40 -39.4% -22.4% 17.9% 7.1% 43.6% 37.4% 38.5% 55.1% 0.0% 0.4% Limited English Proficiency Students 36 -38.5% -32.1% 6.1% 6.5% 54.5% 47.8% 39.4% 44.9% 0.0% 0.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 123 -9.3% 4.0% 5.8% 2.1% 25.6% 16.0% 66.9% 77.3% 1.7% 4.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Reno, NV Procter R Hug High School in Reno, Nevada (NV)
-14.5%
1.3%
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: