Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Como Montessori School in Fort Worth, TX
(KG-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 42
Address
 4001 LITTLEPAGE ST
Fort Worth, TX 76107
Telephone
(817) 815-7200
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.fortworthisd.org
City-data.com school rating
42
Students
320
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
20.5
Free lunch eligible students
172
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
22
School district
FORT WORTH ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
M L PHILLIPS EL (1.2 miles):

68
RIDGLEA HILLS EL (1.5 miles):

63
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS H S (1.6 miles):

42
Como Montessori School:

42
BOULEVARD HEIGHTS (1.4 miles):

29
PREMIER H S OF FORT WORTH (0.8 miles):

26
MONNIG MIDDLE (1.1 miles):

21
COMO EL (0.1 miles):

15
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY FORT WORTH (1.4 miles):

8
Como Montessori School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Tarrant County:

54
Fort Worth:

45
Como Montessori School:

42

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 320
Enrollment in 2015: 352
Enrollment in 2014: 340
Enrollment in 2013: 347
Enrollment in 2012: 354
Enrollment in 2011: 362
Enrollment in 2010: 346
Enrollment in 2009: 337
Enrollment in 2008: 339
Enrollment in 2007: 370
Enrollment in 2006: 407
Enrollment in 2005: 398
Enrollment in 2004: 394
Enrollment in 2003: 388
Enrollment in 2002: 393
Enrollment in 2001: 403
Enrollment in 2000: 375
Enrollment in 1999: 384

Como Montessori School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students254141384537322932320
Female students112024252021191014164
Male students142117132516131918156
Asian students21 - 12 - - 1 - 7
Hispanic students151815131817151315139
Black students717201515161388119
White students14688335846
Two or More Races students - 1 - 1211219

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 25
1st grade enrollment: 41
2nd grade enrollment: 41
3rd grade enrollment: 38
4th grade enrollment: 45
5th grade enrollment: 37
6th grade enrollment: 32
7th grade enrollment: 29
8th grade enrollment: 32

Como Montessori School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 164 (51.3%)
Here:

51.3%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 156 (48.8%)
Como Montessori School:

48.8%
State:

50.1%

Como Montessori School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 7 (2.2%)
Como Montessori School:

2.2%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 139 (43.4%)
School:

43.4%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 119 (37.2%)
Here:

37.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 46 (14.4%)
School:

14.4%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (2.8%)
Here:

2.8%
Texas:

2.1%

Como Montessori School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 194 (60.6%)
School:

60.6%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 172 (53.8%)
Here:

53.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 22 (6.9%)
Here:

6.9%
State:

6.2%

Como Montessori School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 20.5

Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Como Montessori School:

15.6
Texas:

15.6

Como Montessori School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,562,248
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 20.5 (Salary Expenditures: $1,082,095)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 8.8 (Salary Expenditures: $155,375)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $132,475)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $192,303)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $45,089
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $1,700,160
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,195,068
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 10.8 (Salary Expenditures: $180,314)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $132,475)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $192,303)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $101,954

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic61
  • Asian2
  • White4
  • IDEA10
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 67 (male: 30, female: 37)
  • Hispanic: 61 (male: 26, female: 35)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 18 (male: 10, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • Black: 4 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic7
  • Black4
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 7, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

5.3%
State:

4.1%

    Total number of students retained in 4th grade

  • Hispanic2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
  • 5042
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Como Montessori School:

4.4%
State:

3.6%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian7
  • Black19
  • White19
  • Multirace4
  • LEP4
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 62 (male: 34, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • White: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Como Montessori School:

193.8
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)
Algebra I Average Scale Score:

4,170
State:

4,001
Algebra I students tested: 7
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.1 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 4.3 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

43%
28%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,175, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
English I Average Scale Score:

4,266
State:

3,637
English I students tested: 7
English I # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

English I Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.4 (93%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.9 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 5: 7.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 6: 8.3 (92%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 100%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

100%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,227, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 100%, Masters: 0%)
100%
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,391
  • Males1,399
  • Females1,382
  • Hispanic1,322
  • Black1,431
Math Average Scale Score:

1,391
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 44
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.3 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

48%
22%
21%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,399, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 16%)
44%
24%
16%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,382, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 0%)
53%
21%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,322, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
38%
13%
37%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,352
  • Males1,373
  • Females1,326
  • Hispanic1,286
  • Black1,378
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,352
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 44
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 44

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (50%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

55%
20%
9%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,373, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 28%)
52%
12%
8%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,326, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 0%)
58%
31%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,286, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 78%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 0%)
78%
16%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,378, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 21%)
42%
25%
12%
21%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,519
  • Males1,506
  • Females1,529
  • Hispanic1,555
  • Black1,480
Math Average Scale Score:

1,519
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 42
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

29%
42%
19%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,506, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 66%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
17%
66%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,529, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 17%)
38%
25%
21%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
22%
28%
33%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,480, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 0%)
35%
56%
9%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,526
  • Males1,517
  • Females1,533
  • Hispanic1,522
  • Black1,519
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,526
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 42
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

29%
21%
29%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 28%)
33%
23%
16%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,533, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 17%)
25%
21%
37%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,522, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 22%)
33%
11%
34%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,519, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 17%)
26%
31%
26%
17%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,857
  • Males3,617
  • Females4,037
  • Hispanic3,778
  • Black3,806
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,857
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 42
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 42

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.1 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.6 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
33%
24%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,617, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 6%)
39%
33%
22%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,037, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 21%)
21%
33%
25%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,778, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 17%)
33%
28%
22%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,806, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 9%)
26%
39%
26%
9%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,633
  • Males1,631
  • Females1,635
  • Hispanic1,605
  • Black1,647
Math Average Scale Score:

1,633
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 32
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.1 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.8 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.4 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 25%

6%
38%
31%
25%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,631, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 33%)
7%
40%
20%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 18%)
6%
35%
41%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
7%
50%
22%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 31%)
8%
23%
38%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,534
  • Males1,540
  • Females1,528
  • Hispanic1,478
  • Black1,569
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,534
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 32
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

44%
12%
28%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
53%
7%
20%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 12%)
35%
18%
35%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
71%
8%
21%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 31%)
23%
23%
23%
31%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,665
  • Males3,671
  • Females3,659
  • Hispanic3,615
  • Black3,678
Science Average Scale Score:

3,665
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 32
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 32

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

38%
35%
22%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,671, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 13%)
40%
20%
27%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,659, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
35%
47%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,615, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
43%
28%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,678, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 15%)
38%
39%
8%
15%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,590
  • Females1,578
  • Hispanic1,572
  • Black1,544
Math Average Scale Score:

1,585
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 36
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.6 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (51%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

31%
50%
11%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,590, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 10%)
29%
47%
14%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 7%)
33%
54%
6%
7%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 6%)
38%
50%
7%
6%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
36%
50%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,568
  • Males1,534
  • Females1,616
  • Hispanic1,510
  • Black1,596
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,568
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 36
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

39%
30%
17%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 10%)
48%
33%
9%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 20%)
27%
26%
27%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,510, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 0%)
63%
19%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
29%
35%
22%
14%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,572
  • Males1,551
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,564
  • Black1,589
Math Average Scale Score:

1,572
State:

1,571
Math students tested: 26
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.3 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.6 (38%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.5 (21%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

54%
38%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,551, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
67%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
47%
41%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
59%
29%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 56%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
44%
56%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,670
  • Males1,630
  • Females1,698
  • Hispanic1,594
  • Black1,769
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,670
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 36
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

31%
30%
17%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,630, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 20%)
33%
34%
13%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,698, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 24%)
29%
28%
19%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
40%
35%
25%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,769, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 46%)
23%
23%
8%
46%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,850
  • Males3,723
  • Females3,946
  • Hispanic3,666
  • Black4,029
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,850
State:

3,515
Writing students tested: 37
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 37

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.6 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.5 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

24%
35%
33%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,723, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
25%
25%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,946, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 14%)
24%
43%
19%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,666, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
25%
45%
30%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 4,029, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
29%
28%
22%
21%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,684
  • Males1,688
  • Females1,680
  • Hispanic1,643
  • Black1,724
Math Average Scale Score:

1,684
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 30
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.3 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

20%
50%
17%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 8%)
8%
54%
30%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 18%)
29%
47%
6%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
20%
67%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,724, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 25%)
17%
41%
17%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,679
  • Males1,758
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,669
  • Black1,693
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,679
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 20
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.3 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 10%

10%
45%
35%
10%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,758, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 71%, Masters: 29%)
71%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 70%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 0%)
15%
70%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 0%)
8%
50%
42%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
13%
38%
25%
25%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,700
  • Males3,954
  • Females3,526
  • Hispanic3,586
  • Black3,754
Science Average Scale Score:

3,700
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 27
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (51%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%

33%
41%
19%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,954, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
64%
27%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,526, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 6%)
56%
25%
13%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,586, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 0%)
46%
39%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,754, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 8%)
23%
46%
23%
8%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,653
  • Males3,862
  • Females3,509
  • Hispanic3,533
  • Black3,720
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,653
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 27
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 27

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 8.8 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

41%
37%
11%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,862, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
18%
46%
18%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,509, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 6%)
56%
31%
7%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,533, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 0%)
46%
46%
8%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,720, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
38%
31%
16%
15%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic13
  • Black10
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
  • IDEA4
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 29 (male: 18, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Como Montessori School:

90.6
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic11
  • Black22
  • White6
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
  • IDEA3
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 41 (male: 35, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 11 (male: 8, female: 3)
  • Black: 22 (male: 19, female: 3)
  • White: 6 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 3 (all female)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 24

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

75.0
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

    Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic7
  • Black5
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Here:

6.3
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 15 (male: 9, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 4 (all male)
  • White: 4
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Como Montessori School:

26.7%
State:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Fort Worth, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Fort Worth main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Como Montessori School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents